Judgment of the Court of 29 January 2002.

Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Beata Pokrzeptowicz-Meyer.

Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesarbeitsgericht - Germany.

External relations - Europe Agreement between the Communities and Poland - Interpretation of the first indent of Article 37(1) - Prohibition of discrimination based on nationality as regards conditions of employment or dismissal for Polish workers legally employed in a Member State - Fixed-term contract of employment of a foreign-language assistant - Effect on such a contract of the entry into force of the Europe Agreement.

Case C-162/00.


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
20/04/2002 Pokrzeptowicz-Meyer
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2002:57
29/01/2002 Pokrzeptowicz-Meyer
Judgment (Summary)
20/09/2001 Pokrzeptowicz-Meyer
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2001:474
20/09/2001 Pokrzeptowicz-Meyer
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

2002 I-01049

Subject-matter

Interpretation of Article 37(1) of the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Poland, of the other part ─ Prohibition of discrimination based on nationality as regards the working conditions, remuneration or dismissal of Polish workers legally employed in the territory of a Member State ─ Employment contract concluded with a Polish foreign-language assistant for a fixed term (four years) ─ Effect of the entry into force of the Europe Agreement on a contract of that kind which is already in existence.

Systematic classification scheme

1.
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-25 International agreements
    B-25.04 Effects. Scope and limits
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-25 International agreements
    B-25.05 The various agreements concluded by the Community
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-25 International agreements
    B-25.05 The various agreements concluded by the Community


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 02/05/2000

Date of the Opinion

  • 20/09/2001

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

29/01/2002


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 211 from 22.07.2000, p.6

Judgment: OJ C 97 from 20.04.2002, p.1

Name of the parties

Pokrzeptowicz-Meyer

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Van der Burg, F.H.: Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2002 nº 95
  2. Staples, H.: Gelijke behandeling voor onderdanen van de Midden- en Oost-Europese landen die in een lidstaat arbeid in loondienst verrichten, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2002 p.81-85
  3. Ter Heegde, Annemarie: Europa-Abkommen, European Law Reporter 2002 p.208-209
  4. Tschäpe, Philipp: Zum Zugangsrecht zum Europäischen Arbeitsmarkt für MOE-Staatsangehörige nach den Rechtssachen C-63/99 und C-162/00, Informationsbrief Ausländerrecht 2002 p.277-281
  5. Evtimov, Erik: The freedom of movement for workers under the Europe Agreements of the EC with the Central and Eastern European countries, The European legal forum 2002 p.235-239 (EN)
  6. Evtimov, Erik: Zur Arbeitnehmerfreizügigkeit in den Europa-Abkommen der EG mit den MOEL, The European legal forum 2002 p.235-240 (D)
  7. Evtimov, Erik: Sulla libertà di circolazione dei lavoratori dipendenti secondo gli accordi europei con i Paesi dell'Europa centro orientale, The European legal forum 2002 p.235-240 (I)
  8. Fabiano, Laura: La Corte di giustizia motore dell'integrazione "negativa" fra l'Unione ed i Paesi associati, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 2002 p.662-664
  9. Nuyts, Dirk: De PECO-arresten en het recht op vestiging, Tijdschrift voor vreemdelingenrecht 2002 p.280-284
  10. Hillion, Christophe: Common Market Law Review 2003 p.465-491
  11. Holzer, Wolfgang ; Reissner, Gert-Peter: Zur arbeitsrechtlichen Gleichbehandlungspflicht in EU-Assoziationsabkommen, Das Recht der Arbeit 2003 p.476-480
  12. Luby, Monique: Chronique de jurisprudence du Tribunal et de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes, Journal du droit international 2003 p.622-624
  13. Kłaczyńska, Katarzyna: Zakaz dyskryminacji polskich pracowników w państwach Unii Europejskiej. Uwagi w związku z orzeczeniem Europejskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości wydanym na podstawie Układu Europejskiego w sprawie Pokrzeptowicz-Meyer, Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego 2003 Vol.1 p.41-54
  14. Hamerník, Pavel: Rozsudek Evropského soudního dvora Simutenkov - definitivní konec cizineckých kvót ve sportu v EU?, Právní rozhledy : casopis pro vsechna právní odvetví 2005 p.795-799



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Bundesarbeitsgericht - Germany

Subject-matter

  • External relations
  • - Association Agreement
  • Freedom of movement for workers

Provisions of national law referred to

Hochschulrahmengesetz (HRG) (in der bis zum 24.08.1998 geltenden Fassung), Paragraph 57b Abs. 3

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

Cour plénière (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

La Pergola

Advocate General

Jacobs

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • English