Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 101 -P1 : paragraphs 1, 11, 15, 17, 25, 26, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 44 - 46, 49, 51, 52, 54, 66, 75, 86, 87
• TFEU, Article 101 -P1LA : paragraphs 62, 63
• TFEU, Article 101 -P3 : paragraphs 41, 42
• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraphs 47, 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/65 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/76 -N4 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -89/85 -N13 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/85 -N17 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N14 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N15 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -102/91 -N18 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N27 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N48 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/11 -N29 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/11 -N43 : paragraph 80
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -382/12 -N161 : paragraph 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -382/12 -N164 : paragraph 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -382/12 -N184 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -382/12 -N185 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N51 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N52 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N53 : paragraph 51
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N54 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N58 : paragraph 54
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N70 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N76 : paragraph 66
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N77 : paragraph 66
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N78 : paragraph 67
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N79 : paragraph 68
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -231/14 -N72 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/14 -N16 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/14 -N17 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/14 -N19 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/14 -N20 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/14 -N24 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/14 -N25 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/14 -N26 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -228/18 : paragraphs 43, 61, 76

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 101 -P1

Opinion

• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 85 -P1 : point 25
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81 -P1 : points 11, 15
  
• TFEU, Article 101 : points 1, 3, 15, 28
  
• TFEU, Article 101 -P1 : points 18, 22 - 24, 27, 31, 35 - 37, 46, 48, 50, 71, 78, 80, 81, 83, 85, 87, 90 - 92, 95 - 98, 100, 103, 107 - 109
  
• TFEU, Article 101 -P3 : points 34, 35, 66, 81
  
• TFEU, Article 102 : point 46
  
• TFEU, Article 267 -P3 : point 70
  
• Decision 2002/914 : point 66
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P3 : point 33
  
• Regulation 751/2015 : point 76
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/64 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/65 : points 25, 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -283/81 -N16 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -322/81 -N57 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/84 -N19 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/84 -N20 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/84 -N15 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/84 -N16 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/84 -N17 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N8 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N9 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N10 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N11 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N12 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N13 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N14 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N15 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N16 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N17 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N18 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N19 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/87 -N20 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/92 -N86 : point 105
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/92 -N87 : point 105
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/92 -N131 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/92 -N132 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/92 -N133 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/92 -N134 : point 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/92 -N135 : point 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/92 -N136 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/92 -N159 : point 96
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -250/92 -N32 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/93 -N59 : point 46
  
• General Court - Judgment T -17/93 -N85 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/00 -N83 : point 105
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/00 -N86 : point 107
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N32 : point 87
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N46 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N47 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N48 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N49 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N50 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N51 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N52 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N53 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N54 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N55 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N56 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N57 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N58 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N59 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N60 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N61 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N62 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/05 -N63 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -501/06 -N58 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -209/07 -N53 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/07 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -8/08 -N43 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/08 : point 87
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/08 -N31 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/08 -N136 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/08 -N143 : point 46
  
• General Court - Judgment T -111/08 : point 64
  
• General Court - Judgment T -111/08 -N137 : point 76
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -439/09 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -439/09 -N40 : point 80
  
• General Court - Judgment T -472/09 -N159 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/11 -N29 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/11 -N36 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/11 -N37 : point 43
  
• General Court - Judgment T -655/11 -N419 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -382/12 -N52 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -382/12 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -382/12 -N89 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -67/13 -N30 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -67/13 -N56 : points 42, 81
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -67/13 -N79 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 : point 3
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N50 : points 26, 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N51 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N58 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N75 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N79 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N80 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N81 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N82 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N83 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N84 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N85 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N86 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N87 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -286/13 -N117 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -286/13 -N118 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -23/14 -N29 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -194/14 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -231/14 -N72 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/14 : point 3
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/14 -N18 : points 33, 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/14 -N19 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/14 -N22 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/14 -N23 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/14 -N24 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/14 -N29 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/14 -N138 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/14 -N139 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/14 -N140 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/14 -N141 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/14 -N142 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/14 -N143 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/14 -N144 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/14 -N145 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/14 -N146 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/14 -N147 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -99/17 -N156 : point 43
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 03/04/2018

Date of the Opinion

• 05/09/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

02/04/2020

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Budapest Bank and Others

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Wardhaugh, Bruce: CJEU: anti-competitive agreements - interchange fees: Gazdasagi Versenyhivatal v Budapest Bank Nyrt. (C-228/18) EU:C:2020:265, European Competition Law Review 2020, n° 7, N53-N54 (EN)
2. Idot, Laurence: Concurrence - Restriction de concurrence par objet, Europe 2020, n° 6 Juin, Comm. 197 (FR)
3. Kecsmár, Krisztián: Arrêt Budapest Bank : la Cour de justice a-t-elle opéré un pas en avant et un en arrière en matière de l’application de la restriction de concurrence « par objet » ?, Revue des affaires européennes 2020 n°2 p. 463-475 (FR)
4. Elkerbout, Ruben: Het Hongaarse banken-arrest : vlees doch vis en een eendentest voor doelbeperkingen, Markt & Mededinging 2020 p. 250-257 (NL)
5. Bardusco, Thomas ; Juvigny, Olivier de: Budapest Bank : new light shed on the notion of restriction of competition "by object" : case C-228/18 Gazdasági Versenyhivatal/Budapest Bank Nyrt e.a., Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2020 Vol. 11 nº 3-4 p. 163-165 (EN)
6. Idot, Laurence: Restriction de concurrence par objet et accords sur les commissions interbancaires : un couple impossible ?, Revue des contrats 2020, n° 3, p. 106-109 (FR)
7. Debroux, Michel: Restriction par objet : La Cour de justice de l’Union européenne tente à nouveau de clarifier le concept de restriction de concurrence par objet (et n’y parvient pas totalement) et fournit une méthodologie pratique pour identifier un tel objet (et n’échoue pas entièrement) (Gazdasági Versenyhivatal / Budapest Bank Nyrt), Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence 2020, nº 3, p. 88-90 (FR)
8. Massarano, Nissim: The unclear effects of the Budapest Bank experience : (C-228/18), European Competition Law Review 2021, n° 2, p. p. 65-68 (EN)
9. Koivusalo, Jussi: The pursuit of an anti-competitive outcome - restrictions of competition by object after GUK and Budapest Bank : cases cited : Generics (UK) Ltd v Competition and Markets Authority (C-307/18), Gazdasagi Versenyhivatal v Budapest Bank Nyrt (C-228/18), European Competition Law Review 2021, n° 6, p. 316-331 (EN)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Kúria - Hungary

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  
• Reference for a preliminary ruling : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  

Formation of the Court

cinquième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Regan

Advocate General

Bobek

Language(s) of the Case

• Hungarian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English