Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 17 October 2013

Michael Schwarz v Stadt Bochum

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gelsenkirchen

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Biometric passport — Fingerprints — Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 — Article 1(2) — Validity — Legal basis — Procedure for adopting — Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to respect for private life — Right to the protection of personal data — Proportionality

Case C‑291/12


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
29/11/2013 Schwarz
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2013:670
17/10/2013 Schwarz
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2013:670
17/10/2013 Schwarz
Application (OJ)
23/08/2012 Schwarz
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2013:401
13/06/2013 Schwarz
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Verwaltungsgericht Gelsenkirchen – Validity of Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 of 13 December 2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States (OJ 2004 L 385, p. 1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 444/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 (OJ 2009 L 142, p. 1), as amended (OJ 2009 L 188, p. 127), in the light of Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Right of a person to be issued with a passport without his fingerprints being taken

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
      4.06.01.01 Documents
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
      4.06.01.02 Crossing of external borders
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.05 Legal acts of the European Union
    2.05.01 Adoption procedures
      2.05.01.01 Ordinary legislative acts
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.03 The fundamental rights
      1.04.03.07 Respect for private and family life
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.03 The fundamental rights
      1.04.03.08 Protection of personal data
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.02 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
      1.04.02.02 Scope of the protection of rights and principles
        1.04.02.02.01 Limitation on the exercise of rights and freedoms (Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.03 The fundamental rights
      1.04.03.07 Respect for private and family life
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.03 The fundamental rights
      1.04.03.08 Protection of personal data
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
      4.06.01.01 Documents
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
      4.06.01.02 Crossing of external borders


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 12/06/2012

Date of the Opinion

  • 13/06/2013

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

17/10/2013


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 273 from 08.09.2012, p.5

Judgment: OJ C 367 from 14.12.2013, p.17

Name of the parties

Schwarz

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Overkleeft-Verburg, G.: Jurisprudentie bestuursrecht 2013 n° 235 (NL)
  2. Brouwer, Evelien: "Slimme grenzen". Het gebruik van EU-databestanden voor migratiecontrole, Asiel en Migrantenrecht 2013 p.461-467 (NL)
  3. Gazin, Fabienne: Passeports biométriques, Europe 2013 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.29-30 (FR)
  4. Adobati, Enrica: La Corte di giustizia si pronuncia sulla validità dell'inserimento delle impronte digitali nel passaporto, Diritto comunitario e degli scambi internazionali 2013 p.635-637 (IT)
  5. Koufaki, Ioanna: Psifiaka daktylika apotypomata kai prostasia themeliodon dikaiomaton, Nomiko Vima 2013 p.2319-2322 (EL)
  6. Klingenberg, A.M.: Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2014 nº 128 (NL)
  7. Brouwer, Evelien: Rechtspraak Vreemdelingenrecht 2013 (Ed. Ars Aequi Libri - Nijmegen) 2013 p.554-558 (NL)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Verwaltungsgericht Gelsenkirchen - Germany

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • Fundamental rights
  • - Charter of Fundamental Rights
  • Data protection

Provisions of national law referred to

Paßgesetz (PaßG), Paragraph 4 Abs. 3 und 4

Provisions of international law referred to

Convention européenne de sauvegarde des Droits de l'Homme et des Libertés fondamentales (04/11/1950), art. 8

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

quatrième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Malenovský

Advocate General

Mengozzi

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • French