Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 64/221 : paragraph 8
• Directive 68/360 : paragraph 8
• Regulation 1612/68 : paragraph 8
• Directive 72/194 : paragraph 8
• Directive 75/34 : paragraph 8
• Directive 90/364 : paragraph 8
• Directive 90/365 : paragraph 8
• Directive 93/96 : paragraph 8
• Directive 2004/38 : paragraphs 8, 84
• Directive 2004/38 -A07 : paragraphs 8, 82, 84
• Directive 2004/38 -A12 : paragraph 82
• Directive 2004/38 -A13 : paragraph 82
• Directive 2004/38 -A14P1 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/38 -A14P2 : paragraphs 9, 81, 82, 84
• Directive 2004/38 -A14P3 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/38 -A15P1 : paragraph 10
• Directive 2004/38 -A24 : paragraph 11
• Regulation 883/2004 : paragraph 67
• Regulation 883/2004 -A01LJ : paragraphs 2, 61, 62, 66
• Regulation 883/2004 -A01LZ : paragraphs 2, 61
• Regulation 883/2004 -A03P1 : paragraph 63
• Regulation 883/2004 -A03P1LJ : paragraph 3
• Regulation 883/2004 -A04 : paragraphs 1, 4, 74, 86
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P1 : paragraph 5
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3 : paragraph 5
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3LA : paragraph 63
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3LB : paragraph 63
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3LC : paragraph 63
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3LD : paragraph 63
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3LE : paragraphs 62 - 64, 66, 69, 72, 73
• Regulation 883/2004 -A67 : paragraph 6
• Regulation 883/2004 -A70 : paragraph 56
• Regulation 883/2004 -A71 : paragraph 56
• Regulation 987/2009 : paragraph 7
• Regulation 987/2009 -A11 : paragraph 7
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/91 -N22 : paragraph 60
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -245/94 -N27 : paragraph 60
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -90/97 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99 -N44 : paragraph 80
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/03 -N56 : paragraph 80
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -73/08 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/08 -N41 : paragraph 77
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/08 -N45 : paragraph 78
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/12 -N46 : paragraph 79
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 : paragraphs 27, 43, 44, 46, 47, 49 - 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N40 : paragraph 64
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N41 : paragraph 65
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N43 : paragraph 67
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N44 : paragraphs 38, 68
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N61 : paragraph 80
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 : paragraphs 49, 51
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N63 : paragraph 80
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N83 : paragraph 68
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N89 : paragraph 65
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -308/14 -N54 : paragraph 72
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -308/14 -N92 : paragraph 81
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/14 -N60 : paragraph 85

Operative part

• Reference : Regulation 883/2004 -A04

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 45 : point 69
  
• TFEU, Article 18 : points 48, 50, 68
  
• TFEU, Article 18 -L1 : point 69
  
• TFEU, Article 20 : point 71
  
• TFEU, Article 20 -P1 : point 67
  
• TFEU, Article 20 -P2 : point 94
  
• TFEU, Article 20 -P2L1LA : point 68
  
• TFEU, Article 20 -P2L2 : point 69
  
• TFEU, Article 21 : points 68, 70, 94
  
• TFEU, Article 21 -P1 : point 69
  
• Directive 64/221 : point 2
  
• Directive 68/360 : point 2
  
• Regulation 1612/68 : point 2
  
• Directive 72/194 : point 2
  
• Directive 75/34 : point 2
  
• Directive 90/364 : point 2
  
• Directive 90/365 : point 2
  
• Directive 93/96 : point 2
  
• Directive 2004/38 : points 2, 3, 54, 64, 66, 71 - 73, 77, 85, 89, 96
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07 : points 9, 80, 88, 93
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1LB : point 97
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A08 : point 80
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A14 : point 10
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A14P2 : points 92, 93
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A14P2L2 : points 95, 99
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A15 : point 95
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A15P1 : points 95, 99
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A19 : point 80
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A30 : points 95, 99
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A31 : points 95, 96, 99
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C4 : point 71
  
• Regulation 883/2004 : points 1, 2, 46, 49, 52, 53, 70, 72, 73, 77
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A01LJ : points 4, 51
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A01LZ : points 4, 46
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A03P1LJ : points 5, 46
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A04 : points 3, 6, 38, 39, 42, 66, 78, 79, 85, 99
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A07 : point 63
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P1 : points 7, 52
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3LA : points 48, 50
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3LB : points 48, 50
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3LC : points 48, 50
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3LD : points 48, 50
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3LE : points 7, 39, 40, 48, 50, 51, 54 - 56
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A67 : point 8
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A70 : points 43, 64
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -C1 : point 70
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -C45 : point 70
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A11P3LA : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A127 : point 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/84 -N21 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/91 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/91 -N21 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/91 -N22 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -245/94 -N27 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/96 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/96 -N63 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -90/97 -N28 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -90/97 -N29 : points 51, 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/98 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/98 -N28 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99 -N31 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99 -N32 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99 -N44 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/99 -N84 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -138/02 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/02 : points 73, 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/02 -N31 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/03 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/03 -N32 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/03 -N56 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -73/08 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/08 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/08 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/08 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -503/09 -N100 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -589/10 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -589/10 -N45 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/11 -N50 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -140/12 -N74 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -140/12 -N93 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/12 -N27 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/12 -N28 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 : points 2, 19, 26, 28, 29, 34, 61-63, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N38 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N41 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N44 : points 33, 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N46 : points 69, 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N47 : points 69, 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N58 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N61 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N63 : points 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N64 : points 31, 35, 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N65 : points 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N66 : points 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N67 : points 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N68 : points 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N69 : points 31, 35, 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N70 : points 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N71 : points 28, 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N72 : points 28, 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N73 : points 28, 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N74 : points 28, 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N75 : points 28, 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N76 : points 28, 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N77 : points 28, 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N78 : points 28, 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N79 : points 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N80 : points 31, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -333/13 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -333/13 -N90 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 : points 2, 33, 61, -63, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N49 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N57 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N59 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N60 : points 69, 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N63 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N69 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N73 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N77 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -394/13 -N26 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -67/14 -N107 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -299/14 : point 2
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -299/14 -N85 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/14 : points 2, 61, 71, 73, 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/14 -N43 : point 64
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 27/06/2014

Date of the Opinion

• 06/10/2015

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

14/06/2016

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 305 from 22.08.2016, p.4

Application: OJ C 329 from 22.09.2014, p.2

Name of the parties

Commission v United Kingdom

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Eichenhofer, Eberhard: Zeitschrift für europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 2015 p.484-485 (DE)
2. Berlin, Dominique: La Cour s'invite dans le débat sur le Brexit ?, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2016 nº 26 p.1310 (FR)
3. Cavallini, Joël: Citoyen européen économiquement inactif et accès aux allocations familiales, La Semaine Juridique - Social 2016 nº 27-28 p.25-28 (FR)
4. Paju, Jaan: EU-domstolens begränsning av åtkomst till sociala trygghetsförmåner - Mål C-308/14, Kommissionen mot Förenade kungariket och Nordirland, Europarättslig tidskrift 2016 nº 3 p.502-514 (SV)
5. Driguez, Laetitia: L'État de résidence habituelle, compétent en matière de prestations familiales à l'égard des personnes économiquement actives, peut soumettre l'octroi de ces prestations de sécurité sociale à une condition de séjour régulier, Europe 2016 Septembre Comm. nº 8-9 p.27-28 (FR)
6. Antloga, Alenka: Pravica do zakonitega prebivanja kot diskriminatoren pogoj pri upravičenosti do dajatev iz naslova socialne varnosti?, Pravna praksa 2016 nº 35 p.28-29 (SL)
7. O'Brien, Charlotte: A failed Faustian pact: Case C-308/14 Commission v UK and the sacrifice of EU citizenship, Quaderni costituzionali 2016 p.824-827 (EN)
8. Shuibhne, Niamh Nic: ‘WHAT I TELL YOU THREE TIMES IS TRUE’ Lawful Residence and Equal Treatment after Dano, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2016 p.908-936 (EN)
9. Bokeloh, Arno: Art. 4 VO (EG) Nr. 883/2004: Kindergeld für Nichterwerbstätige mit Aufenthaltstitel, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht 2016 p.1570-1571 (DE)
10. Bollo Arocena, María Dolores: Salvaguarda de las finanzas públicas, derecho de residencia y obtención de prestaciones de seguridad social en el Estado miembro de acogida. Comentario a la Sentencia del TJUE (Sala Primera), de 14 de junio de 2016. Asunto C-308/14, Revista Aranzadi Unión Europea 2016 nº 8-9 p.95-102 (ES)
11. Hojnik, Janja: Pomoč za vzdrževanega otroka v drugi državi članici EU, Davčno-finančna praksa : davki, finance, zavarovalnistvo 2016 n° 6 p.24-27 (SL)
12. Verschueren, H.: Economisch niet-actieve migrerende Unieburgers: enkel recht op sociale uitkeringen indien zij over een verblijfsrecht beschikken, S.E.W. ; Sociaal-economische wetgeving 2017 p.36-41 (NL)
13. O’brien, Charlotte: A. Court of Justice The ECJ sacrifices EU citizenship in vain: Commission v. United Kingdom, Common Market Law Review 2016 p.209–243 (EN)
14. Eichenhofer, Eberhard: Sozialpolitik : Kindergeld / Steuergutschrift / Europäisches koordinierendes Sozialrecht, Zeitschrift für europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 2017 p.46-48 (DE)
15. Felten, Elias: Beschränkter Zugang zu Sozialleistungen für Unionsbürger, Das Recht der Arbeit 2017 p.99-101 (DE)
16. Strumia, Francesca ; Hughes, Mary E.: A Momentary Blip or a Step Forward in Revisionist Free Movement?: Case C-308/14 European Commission v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (14 June 2016), European Public Law 2017 p.723-737 (EN)
17. Paju, Jaan: On the lack of legal reasonning in case C-308/14, European Commission v United Kingdom, Industrial Law Journal 2019 Vol.48 N°1 p.117-136 (EN)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Social security
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Action for a declaration of failure to fulfil obligations : dismissal on substantive grounds
  

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Berger

Advocate General

Cruz Villalón

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• Spanish