Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 July 2010.

Anheuser-Busch Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Appeals - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Application for registration of the word mark BUDWEISER - Opposition - Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 40/94 - Earlier international word and figurative marks BUDWEISER and Budweiser Budvar - Genuine use of the earlier trade mark - Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 - Submission of evidence ‘in due time’ - Certificate of renewal for the earlier mark - Article 74(2) of Regulation No 40/94.

Case C-214/09 P.



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
11/09/2010 Anheuser-Busch v OHIM
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2010:456
29/07/2010 Anheuser-Busch v OHIM
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2010:456
29/07/2010 Anheuser-Busch v OHIM
Application (OJ)
15/08/2009 Anheuser-Busch v OHIM
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

2010 I-07665

Subject-matter

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 March 2009 in Case T-191/07 Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action brought by the applicant for the word mark “BUDWEISER” for goods in class 32 seeking annulment of Decision R 299/2006-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2007, dismissing the appeal brought against the decision of the opposition division rejecting the registration of the mark in view of the opposition brought by the proprietor of the international figurative and word marks “BUDWEISER” and “Budweiser Budvar” for goods in classes 31 and 32.

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.04 Procedure and legal proceedings
        4.11.03.04.01 Registration procedure
          4.11.03.04.01.02 Opposition proceedings


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 08/06/2009

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

29/07/2010


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 193 from 15.08.2009, p.13

Judgment: OJ C 246 from 11.09.2010, p.8

Name of the parties

Anheuser-Busch v OHIM

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Schoene, Volker: EuGH: Verschärfte Fristenregelung der neuen Durchführungs-VO zur GMV hat keine Rückwirkung - "Budweiser", Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht - Praxis im Immaterialgüter- und Wettbewerbsrecht 2010 p.360



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment
  • Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
  • Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility

Formation of the Court

quatrième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Bonichot

Advocate General

Cruz Villalón

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available