Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 July 2018

Bosphorus Queen Shipping Ltd Corp. v Rajavartiolaitos

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Montego Bay Convention — Article 220(6) — Enforcement by the coastal State — Jurisdiction of the Court to interpret provisions of international law — Directive 2005/35/EC — Ship-source pollution — Article 7(2) — Marpol Convention 73/78 — Oil spill in the exclusive economic zone from a foreign vessel in transit — Circumstances in which a coastal State may instigate proceedings against a foreign vessel — Freedom of navigation — Protection of the marine environment — Major damage or threat of major damage to the coastline, related interests or any resources in the territorial sea or exclusive economic zone — Clear objective evidence)

Case C-15/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
24/08/2018 Bosphorus Queen Shipping
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2018:557
11/07/2018 Bosphorus Queen Shipping
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2018:557
11/07/2018 Bosphorus Queen Shipping
Application (OJ)
03/03/2017 Bosphorus Queen Shipping
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2018:123
28/02/2018 Bosphorus Queen Shipping
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
3 Legal proceedings
  3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
    3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
3 Legal proceedings
  3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
    3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
3 Legal proceedings
  3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
    3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.07 Transport
    4.07.04 Maritime transport
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.07 Transport
    4.07.04 Maritime transport
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.07 Transport
    4.07.04 Maritime transport
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.07 Transport
    4.07.04 Maritime transport
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.07 Transport
    4.07.04 Maritime transport
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.07 Transport
    4.07.04 Maritime transport
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.07 Transport
    4.07.04 Maritime transport


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 13/01/2017

Date of the Opinion

  • 28/02/2018

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

11/07/2018


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 319 from 10.09.2018, p.5

Application: OJ C 86 from 20.03.2017, p.17

Name of the parties

Bosphorus Queen Shipping

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Rajot, Bénédicte: Quand la liberté des mers s'efface au profit de la lutte contre la pollution environnementale, Le droit maritime français 2019 p.262-269 (FR)
  2. Gautier, Philippe: C.J.U.E., 11 juillet 2018 (Bosphorus Queen Shipping Ltd Corp. c. Rajavartiolaitos), C-15/17, ECLI:EU:C:2018:557 (renvoi préjudiciel), Aménagement - Environnement 2019 N°1 p.27-30 (FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Korkein oikeus - Finland

Subject-matter

  • Environment
  • - Pollution
  • External relations
  • - international agreements
  • Transport

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Convention des Nations Unies sur le droit de la mer (10/12/1982), article 220, paragraphe 6

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Malenovský

Advocate General

Wahl

Language(s) of the Case

  • Finnish

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • English