Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Community trade mark – Action for annulment brought by the applicant for the word mark ‘Premeno’ for goods in Class 5 against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 21 September 2010 in Case R 708/2010-4 dismissing the appeal against the Opposition Division’s decision, which refused registration of that mark in the opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the national word mark ‘Pramino’ in respect of goods in Class 5

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Regulation 2868/95 -A01R13 : paragraph 39
• Regulation 2868/95 -A01R2P2 : paragraph 37
• Regulation 207/2009 -A08P1LB : paragraph 54
• Regulation 207/2009 -A26P1LC : paragraph 37
• Regulation 207/2009 -A42P2 : paragraphs 20 - 34, 47
• Regulation 207/2009 -A42P3 : paragraphs 20 - 34, 47
• Regulation 207/2009 -A43 : paragraph 39
• Regulation 207/2009 -A43P1 : paragraphs 37 - 53
• Regulation 207/2009 -C10 : paragraph 20
• General Court - Judgment T -219/00 : paragraphs 39, 40
• General Court - Judgment T -39/01 : paragraph 20
• General Court - Judgment T -194/01 : paragraphs 39, 40
• General Court - Judgment T -286/02 : paragraphs 39, 40
• General Court - Judgment T -396/02 : paragraphs 39, 40
• General Court - Judgment T -126/03 : paragraphs 21 - 23, 26, 28
• General Court - Judgment T -418/03 : paragraph 20
• General Court - Judgment T -256/04 : paragraphs 21, 27, 28, 31, 43, 44, 46, 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -412/05 : paragraphs 30, 31
• General Court - Judgment T -146/06 : paragraph 31
• General Court - Judgment T -304/06 : paragraphs 37, 38
• General Court - Judgment T -487/08 : paragraph 31
• General Court - Judgment T -331/09 : paragraphs 43, 46
• General Court - Judgment T -492/09 : paragraph 31
• General Court - Judgment T -222/10 : paragraphs 31, 44 - 47
• General Court - Judgment T -290/10 : paragraph 21

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 23/11/2010

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

08/11/2013

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 30 from 29.01.2011, p.46

Judgment: OJ C 377 from 21.12.2013, p.11

Name of the parties

Kessel v OHMI - Janssen-Cilag (Premeno)

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  
• - Trade marks
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
  
• Actions for annulment : application granted
  

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Buttigieg

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available