Reports of Cases
not yet published (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.01 Institutions
2.01.01 European Parliament
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.00 General
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.01 Institutions
2.01.01 European Parliament
|
|
|
3.02.01 Acts which may be the subject of an action for annulment
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.01 Acts which may be the subject of an action for annulment
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.01 Institutions
2.01.01 European Parliament
|
|
|
3.02.01 Acts which may be the subject of an action for annulment
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.01 Acts which may be the subject of an action for annulment
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.01 Institutions
2.01.01 European Parliament
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.00 General
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.01 Institutions
2.01.01 European Parliament
|
|
|
7 General and final provisions
7.00 General
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.01 Institutions
2.01.01 European Parliament
|
|
|
7 General and final provisions
7.00 General
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 20
: paragraph 94
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A16L3 : paragraph 16
-
TFEU
: paragraphs 86, 92
-
TFEU, Article 231
-P1 : paragraph 72
-
TFEU, Article 263
: paragraphs 19, 22, 28, 31, 33, 35, 37, 38, 42, 51, 52, 59
-
TFEU, Article 263
-L1 : paragraphs 4, 24, 49
-
TFEU, Article 263
-L2 : paragraphs 50, 54, 60
-
TFEU, Article 263
-L6 : paragraphs 4, 57
-
TFEU, Article 269
: paragraphs 5, 19 - 23, 28 - 32, 34 - 36, 51, 52, 54, 56, 57, 77
-
TFEU, Article 269
-L1 : paragraphs 53, 55
-
TFEU, Article 269
-L2 : paragraph 58
-
TFEU, Article 271
: paragraphs 22, 35
-
TFEU, Article 275
: paragraphs 22, 35
-
TFEU, Article 276
: paragraphs 22, 35
-
TFEU, Article 354
: paragraphs 3, 11, 72, 73, 77, 97
-
TFEU, Article 354
-L1 : paragraphs 66, 70, 90 - 93
-
TFEU, Article 354
-L4 : paragraphs 62, 65, 67, 70, 71, 75, 76, 79, 81, 82, 85, 87, 88, 90, 93 - 95, 99, 100
-
TEU, Article 2
: paragraphs 45, 73, 94
-
TEU, Article 4
-P3 : paragraph 106
-
TEU, Article 7
: paragraphs 2, 20, 21, 23, 25, 30, 31, 35, 52, 53, 59, 70, 82, 85 - 88, 106, 108
-
TEU, Article 7
-P1 : paragraphs 10, 26, 32, 39, 45, 47, 48, 54, 57, 58, 65, 66, 89, 95
-
TEU, Article 7
-P2 : paragraphs 90 - 92
-
TEU, Article 7
-P5 : paragraph 77
-
TEU, Article 10
: paragraph 94
-
TFEU - Protocol No 24
: paragraphs 6, 28, 39
-
TFEU - Protocol No 24
-A01LB : paragraph 25
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A120LC : paragraph 78
-
European Parliament - Own-Initiative Resolution - 52018IP0340
: paragraphs 1, 7, 11, 13, 14, 19, 24, 27, 28, 33, 39 - 42, 45, 47 - 50, 60, 64, 75, 77, 79, 81, 95, 96, 99, 100, 102, 104, 106, 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/83
-N23 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -312/90
-N21 : paragraph 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -312/90
-N22 : paragraph 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -47/91
-N27 : paragraph 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -47/91
-N28 : paragraph 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -149/10
-N64 : paragraph 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/10
-N78 : paragraph 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/10
-N37 : paragraph 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/10
-N50 : paragraph 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/10
-N53 : paragraph 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/10
-N54 : paragraph 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/10
-N60 : paragraph 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -540/13
-N9 : paragraph 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14
-N40 : paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/15
-N66 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/15
-N44 : paragraph 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -621/16
-N44 : paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -663/17
-N54 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -650/18
: paragraphs 48, 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
: paragraphs 26, 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -507/18
-N32 : paragraph 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -575/18
-N46 : paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -575/18
-N47 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Order C -650/18
: paragraph 17
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -119/19
-N137 : paragraph 98
Operative part
Opinion
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21
: point 123
-
TFEU - Protocol No 24
: points 8, 104 - 108
-
TFEU, Article 231
: points 6, 124
-
TFEU, Article 232
: points 119, 131
-
TFEU, Article 263
: points 1, 2, 4, 23, 24, 27, 28, 30 - 32, 43, 44, 53, 61, 62, 72, 73, 75, 76, 78, 80, 99, 102, 116
-
TFEU, Article 263
-L1 : points 81, 103
-
TFEU, Article 263
-L2 : points 34, 77
-
TFEU, Article 268
: point 58
-
TFEU, Article 269
: points 2, 5, 23, 26 - 28, 31, 43 - 50, 52, 53, 55, 57 - 59, 62, 64, 65, 68, 71 - 73, 75, 78, 99
-
TFEU, Article 270
: point 58
-
TFEU, Article 274
: point 58
-
TFEU, Article 275
: points 58, 59
-
TFEU, Article 275
-L1 : points 35, 36
-
TFEU, Article 275
-L2 : point 70
-
TFEU, Article 275
-P1 : point 67
-
TFEU, Article 276
: points 35, 58, 59
-
TFEU, Article 354
: points 2, 7, 23, 118, 119, 123, 134
-
TFEU, Article 354
-L1 : point 120
-
TFEU, Article 354
-L4 : points 120, 125
-
TFEU, Article 354
-P1 : point 99
-
TEU, Article 2
: points 38 - 40, 67, 123
-
TEU, Article 7
: points 3, 23, 25 - 29, 43, 45, 48, 50, 52 - 54, 62, 68, 72, 73, 77, 78, 87, 96, 118, 144
-
TEU, Article 7
-P1 : points 1, 2, 12, 14, 24, 30, 31, 38, 39, 42, 44, 46, 60, 61, 71, 74, 79 - 81, 85, 86, 88 - 93, 98 - 100, 103, 104, 106, 110 - 112, 115, 125, 133, 142, 145, 147
-
TEU, Article 7
-P2 : points 38, 40, 46, 60, 61, 65, 71, 89, 99, 100
-
TEU, Article 7
-P3 : points 32, 38, 41, 42, 61, 64, 65, 67, 70, 71, 76, 80, 98, 99
-
TEU, Article 7
-P4 : point 41
-
TEU, Article 7
-P5 : point 124
-
TEU, Article 7
-SNT1 : point 79
-
TEU, Article 19
: point 36
-
TEU, Article 46
: points 31, 54 - 56
-
TEU, Article 46
-LE : points 50 - 53, 55
-
European Parliament - Own-Initiative Resolution - 52017IP0216
: point 12
-
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52017PC0835
: point 86
-
European Parliament - Own-Initiative Resolution - 52018IP0340
: points 1, 16, 18, 23 - 31, 79, 82, 87, 95, 103, 116, 118, 123, 142, 144, 147
-
European Parliament - Own-Initiative Resolution - 52018IP0340
-N : points 85, 86
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/83
: point 72
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/83
-N23 : point 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/87
-N23 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/87
-N24 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/96
-N26 : point 82
-
General Court - Order T -175/96
-N21 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -400/99
-N62 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -400/99
-N63 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Order C -208/99
-N23 : point 34
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N52 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N53 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N54 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N55 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N56 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N57 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N58 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N59 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N60 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N61 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N62 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N63 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N64 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N65 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N66 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N67 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N68 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N69 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N70 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N71 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N72 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N73 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N74 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N75 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N76 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N77 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N78 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N79 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N80 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N81 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N82 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N83 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N84 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N85 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N86 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N87 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N88 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N89 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N90 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N91 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N92 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N93 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N94 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N95 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N96 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N97 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N98 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N99 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N100 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N101 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N102 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N103 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N104 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N105 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N106 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N107 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N108 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N109 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N110 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N111 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N112 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N113 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N114 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N115 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N116 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N117 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N118 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N119 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N120 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N121 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N122 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N123 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N124 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N125 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -523/04
-N126 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/05
-N281 : point 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/06
-N42 : point 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/09
-N36 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/10
-N53 : point 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/10
-N54 : point 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N91 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N92 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -658/11
-N70 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/13
-N24 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -447/13
-N48 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 2/13
-N161 : point 107
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/14
-N57 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/14
-N58 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/14
-N60 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14
-N40 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14
-N41 : points 67, 101
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -566/14
-N96 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -600/14
-N108 : point 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/15
-N72 : points 67, 101
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/15
-N73 : points 67, 101
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -643/15
-N123 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -643/15
-N124 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -690/15
-N40 : point 107
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/16
-N90 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -244/16
-N102 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -426/16
-N38 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -663/17
-N54 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
: point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18
-N87 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18
-N88 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18
-N89 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18
-N90 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18
-N91 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18
-N92 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18
-N93 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18
-N94 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18
-N95 : points 61, 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18
-N96 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18
-N97 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -575/18
-N52 : point 34
-
Court of Justice - Order C -650/18
: point 20
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N51 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N52 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N53 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N54 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N55 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N56 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N57 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N58 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N59 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N60 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N61 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N62 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N63 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N64 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N65 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N66 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N67 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N68 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N69 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N70 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N71 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N72 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N73 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N74 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N75 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N76 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N77 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N78 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N79 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N80 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N81 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N82 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N83 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N84 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N85 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N86 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N87 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N88 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -14/19
-N89 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N80 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N126 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N127 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N128 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N129 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N130 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N131 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N132 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N133 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N134 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N135 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/19
-N136 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/19
-N66 : point 36
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
03/06/2021
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Information not available
Name of the parties
Hungary v Parliament
Notes on Academic Writings
- Bruyas, Pierrick: Recours en annulation - Procédure de l'article 7 TUE, Europe 2021, n° 8-9 août, comm. 284 (FR)
- Blumann, Claude: Une avancée mal assurée de la justiciabilité de l’article 7 TUE / A poorly secured advance of the justiciability of Article 7 TEU, Revue des affaires européennes 2021 n° 2 p. 399-413 (EN, FR)
- Waele, H.C.F.J.A. de: Nieuwe ontwikkelingen in de Europese rechtsstaatcrisis : Hongarije verliest een slag, maar wie wint de oorlog? : C-650/18, Ars aequi 2021 p. 1118-1122 (NL)
- Platon, Sébastien: Is silence always golden? : the abstention of MEPs and the activation of the Article 7 procedure against Hungary : Hungary v. European Parliament : case C-650/18, Hungary v. European Parliament, Common Market Law Review 2022 p. 543-560 (EN)
- Coutron, Laurent: La résolution du Parlement européen invitant le Conseil à engager la procédure prévue par l'article 7 § 1 TUE : un acte justiciable soumis à un régime hybride, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2022, n° 4, p. 729-733 (FR)
- Dubout, Edouard: I. Questions institutionnelles - Cour de Justice, gde ch., 3 juin 2021, Hongrie c/ Parlement européen, aff. C-650/18, EU:C:2021:426, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2021. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2022, p. 29-33 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Provisions governing the institutions
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Lycourgos
Advocate General
Bobek
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion