Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cour de cassation – Interpretation of Art.5(1) and 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract – Dispute between the sub-buyer of goods and the manufacturer – Scope of the jurisdiction clause in a chain of contracts under Community law
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT1 : paragraphs 5, 14, 20, 22, 32
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A23 : paragraphs 1, 14, 24, 41
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A23P1 : paragraphs 6, 17, 19, 25, 26, 28, 33, 40
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C11 : paragraphs 4, 26, 39
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C2 : paragraphs 3, 39
-
Brussels Convention 1968
: paragraphs 18, 20
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A17 : paragraph 31
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A17L1 : paragraphs 19, 21, 27, 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/83
: paragraphs 34, 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/89
: paragraphs 21, 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/91
: paragraphs 14, 22, 32, 37, 38, 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/95
: paragraphs 27, 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/97
: paragraphs 28, 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/98
: paragraphs 34, 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/07
: paragraph 29
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -543/10
: paragraphs 16, 35, 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/11
: paragraph 18
Operative part
Opinion
-
Regulation 44/2001
: points 1, 25, 45, 55
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A01P3 : point 3
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT1 : points 4, 17, 60, 63, 64
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT1LA : point 6
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT3 : point 60
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A13 : point 20
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A14 : point 20
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A17 : point 20
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A21 : point 20
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A23 : points 3, 17, 20, 26, 29 - 33, 36, 38 - 51, 53 - 57, 62 - 66
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A23P1 : points 7, 25, 61
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C11 : points 5, 41, 48, 51
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C12 : point 46
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C8 : points 46, 47
-
Regulation 593/2008
-A01P2LE : point 35
-
Decision 2009/397
: points 25, 26, 32
-
Brussels Convention 1968
: point 36
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A05PT1 : points 4, 60, 64
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A05PT3 : point 60
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A17 : points 28, 42, 46, 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/76
: point 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -24/76
: points 51, 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -25/76
: points 51, 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/82
: point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/83
: points 3, 43, 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/89
: points 33, 43
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -26/91
: points 24, 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/91
: points 4, 17, 44, 59 - 61, 63 - 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/95
: point 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/97
: points 36, 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/97
: points 3, 46, 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/98
: points 3, 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/02
: point 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -112/03
: point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/07
: point 47
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/08
: point 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -19/09
: point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/09
: point 28
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -133/11
: point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -154/11
: point 45
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
07/02/2013
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 46 from 12.02.2011, p.3
Judgment: OJ C 108 from 13.04.2013, p.2
Name of the parties
Refcomp
Notes on Academic Writings
- Legrand, Véronique: Inopposabilité des clauses d'élection de for dans les chaînes de contrat communautaires : La CJUE a tranché !, Petites affiches. La Loi / Le Quotidien juridique 2013 nº 72 p.6-15 (FR)
- Idot, Laurence: Clause attributive de juridictions et chaîne de contrats. Confirmation de l'opposition de la Cour de justice à la théorie de la chaîne de contrats translatifs de propriété : une clause attributive de juridiction conclue entre un vendeur et l'acquéreur initial est inopposable au tiers sous-acquéreur, s'il n'a pas donné son consentement effectif à ladite clause, Europe 2013 Avril Comm. nº 4 p.38-39 (FR)
- Skubic, Zoran: Sporazum o pristojnosti sodišč in čezmejno veriženje prodajnih pogodb po pravu EU, Pravna praksa 2013 nº 6 p.22 (SL)
- Strikwerda, L.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2013 nº 299 (NL)
- Guez, Philippe: L'inopposabilité de la clause attributive de juridiction au sous-acquéreur dans les chaînes européennes de contrats, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2013 nº 516 p.883-887 (FR)
- Moebus, Christine: EuGVVO: Unwirksamkeit einer Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung zwischen Hersteller und Ersterwerber gegenüber späteren Erwerbern, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2013 p.319-320 (DE)
- Attal, Michel: Non-transmissibilité des clauses attributives de juridiction dans les groupes de contrats : le nouvel échec de la conception française dans les situations internationales ?, La Semaine Juridique - entreprise et affaires 2013 nº 23 p.37-40 (FR)
- Fuchs, Angelika: Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, ERA-Forum : scripta iuris europaei 2013 p.297-298 (DE)
- Vaquero López, Carmen: El alcance de las cláusulas de atribución de competencia en los grupos de contratos. La interpretación del TJCE en el asunto [C-543/10] Refcomp, Revista de Derecho de la Competencia y la Distribución 2013 nº 13 p.255-266 (ES)
- Weller, Matthias: Keine Drittwirkung von Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen bei Vertragsketten, Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts 2013 p.501-505 (DE)
- Clavel, Sandrine: Conflits de juridictions, Journal du droit international 2013 p.1201-1213 (FR)
- Bureau, Dominique: De la transmission d'une clause attributive de juridiction dans une chaîne de contrats, Revue critique de droit international privé 2013 p.710-725 (FR)
- Adam-Caumeil, Judith: Unwirksame Gerichtsstandsklauseln in "Lieferketten", Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft 2014 n° 1 p.I (DE)
- Idot, Laurence: Opposabilité et force obligatoire des clauses processuelles, Revue des contrats 2014 p.704-708 (FR)
- Villata, Francesca C.: Choice-of-Courts Agreements and "Third Parties" in Light of Refcomp and Beyond, Cross-Border Litigation in Europe: The Brussels I Recast Regulatin as Panacea ( Ed. Kluwer - Milanese) 2015 p.127-151 (EN)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Cour de cassation - France
Subject-matter
- area of freedom, security and justice
- - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
première chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Berger
Advocate General
Jääskinen
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion