Reports of Cases
2009 I-03571
Subject-matter
Interpretation of Article 10(1) of Protocol No 10 to the Act of Accession of Cyprus and of Articles 22, 34(1) and (2) and 35(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) – Suspension of the application of the acquis communautaire in those areas in which the Government does not exercise effective control – Recognition and enforcement by the court of another Member State of a decision given by a Cypriot court sitting in the area of effective control and relating to land situated outside that area
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
B-23.02.05 Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia
|
1.
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-23 Accession of new Member States
B-23.02 Acts of accession
B-23.02.05 Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia
|
|
|
B-04.08.03 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-04 Free movement of persons and services
B-04.08 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
B-04.08.03 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
B-04.08.03 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-04 Free movement of persons and services
B-04.08 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
B-04.08.03 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
B-04.08.03 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-04 Free movement of persons and services
B-04.08 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
B-04.08.03 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
B-04.08.03 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-04 Free movement of persons and services
B-04.08 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
B-04.08.03 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
B-04.08.03 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-04 Free movement of persons and services
B-04.08 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
B-04.08.03 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 234
: paragraphs 60, 63
-
Treaty of Accession 2003 - Protocol No 10
: paragraphs 1, 3, 34, 36
-
Treaty of Accession 2003 - Protocol No 10
-A01P1 : paragraphs 32, 37, 39
-
Regulation 44/2001
: paragraphs 1, 2, 32, 36, 38 - 42, 60, 69
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A01 : paragraph 40
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A01P1 : paragraphs 5, 46
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A02 : paragraph 6
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A22 : paragraph 48
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A22PT1 : paragraphs 7, 47, 50, 51
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A34 : paragraphs 8, 55
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A34PT1 : paragraphs 53 - 56, 59, 62, 64, 71
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A34PT2 : paragraphs 72, 74 - 76, 78 - 80
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A35 : paragraph 9
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A35P1 : paragraphs 47, 49, 52
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A35P3 : paragraph 49
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A36 : paragraph 58
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A38 : paragraph 10
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A38P1 : paragraphs 64, 71
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A45 : paragraph 11
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A45P1 : paragraphs 54, 62, 76
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A45P2 : paragraph 58
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A54 : paragraph 68
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C16 : paragraphs 4, 73
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C17 : paragraphs 4, 73
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C18 : paragraphs 4, 73
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A27PT2 : paragraphs 74, 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -29/76
: paragraphs 41 - 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -231/78
: paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -814/79
: paragraphs 41 - 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -258/81
: paragraph 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -11/82
: paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -77/82
: paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -119/84
: paragraph 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/86
: paragraphs 55, 66, 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/87
: paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -365/88
: paragraph 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -330/90
: paragraph 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -172/91
: paragraphs 41, 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/92
: paragraph 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/95
: paragraph 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -233/97
: paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/97
: paragraph 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/98
: paragraphs 55 - 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -38/98
: paragraphs 55 - 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/01
: paragraph 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -266/01
: paragraphs 41 - 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/02
: paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -343/04
: paragraph 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -283/05
: paragraphs 74, 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -292/05
: paragraphs 41 - 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -346/05
: paragraph 63
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -420/07
: paragraph 35
Operative part
Opinion
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 65
: point 37
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 69
: point 26
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 299
: point 26
-
Treaty of Accession 2003 - Protocol No 10
: points 6, 26, 30, 32, 36, 38, 41, 43, 80
-
Treaty of Accession 2003 - Protocol No 10
-A01P1 : points 22, 24, 31, 34, 53, 125
-
Treaty of Accession 2003 - Protocol No 10
-A02 : point 40
-
Treaty of Accession 2003 - Protocol No 10
-A03P1 : point 40
-
Regulation 2667/2000
: point 40
-
Regulation 44/2001
: points 5, 22, 24 - 33, 36 - 38, 42, 44, 46, 48, 49, 52, 53, 57 - 59, 72, 75, 86, 98, 125
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A01P1 : points 7, 54, 73
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A01P3 : point 26
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A02 : point 86
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A02P1 : point 88
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A22 : points 8, 22, 86
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A22PT1 : points 74, 78, 79, 81, 84 - 86, 88, 89, 125
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A33 : point 9
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A33P1 : point 76
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A34 : points 9, 10, 76, 77, 92
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A34P3 : point 65
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A34PT1 : points 22, 54, 90, 91, 95, 100, 103, 104, 107, 112, 125
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A34PT2 : points 22, 54, 113, 114, 116 - 118, 120, 123, 125
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A35 : points 9, 11, 76, 77, 100
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A35P1 : points 22, 54, 74, 79, 87, 89, 125
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A35P3 : points 78, 87, 88, 100
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A36 : points 9, 65, 122
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A37 : point 9
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A38P1 : points 77, 96, 100
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A43 : point 22
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A44 : point 22
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A45P1 : point 77
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A45P2 : points 65, 122
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A54 : point 98
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A59P1 : point 88
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A71P1 : points 57, 70
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C16 : point 75
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C17 : point 75
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C2 : points 36, 75
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C20 : point 26
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C22 : point 26
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C6 : point 75
-
Regulation 866/2004
: point 40
-
Regulation 389/2006
: point 40
-
Brussels Convention 1968
: points 48, 58, 62
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A27 : point 92
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A27PT1 : points 92 - 94
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A27PT2 : points 115, 116, 118
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A31 : point 97
-
Lugano Convention 1988
: point 87
-
Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 52008DC0529
: point 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/65
: point 57
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -29/76
: point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/77
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -231/78
: point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -814/79
: points 58, 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -194/85
: point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/85
: point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/86
: point 92
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/87
: point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/88
: point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/88
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -305/88
: point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -260/89
: point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -123/91
: point 115
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -432/92
: points 2, 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/92
: point 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -292/93
: point 81
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/95
: points 92, 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -412/96
: point 102
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -233/97
: point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/97
: point 97
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -440/97
: point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/98
: points 92 - 94, 103, 106, 110, 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -38/98
: points 92 - 94, 103, 110, 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -112/00
: point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/00
: point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/00
: point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -271/00
: points 58, 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -266/01
: points 58, 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -265/02
: point 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/02
: points 29, 48
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/03
: points 29, 86
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/04
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -343/04
: points 58, 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/05
: point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -13/05
: point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -283/05
: points 75, 116 - 119
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -292/05
: points 58, 59, 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/06
: point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -394/07
: point 109
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -404/07
: point 102
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -296/08
: point 102
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
28/04/2009
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 297 from 08.12.2007, p.20
Judgment: OJ C 153 from 04.07.2009, p.7
Name of the parties
Apostolides
Notes on Academic Writings
- Bernadskaya, Elena: Chypre du Nord et le Règlement "Bruxelles I": application en suspension?, Revue Lamy droit des affaires 2009 nº 36 p.75-76
- Christou, Theodora: ECJ rules on the recognition and enforcement of Cyprus court judgments on land rights in northern part of the island - Case C-420/07, Meletis Apostolides, Bulletin of international legal developments 2009 Vol.8 p.85-87
- Michel, Valérie: Partition de Chypre et champ d'application du droit communautaire, Europe 2009 Juin Comm. nº 213 p.9
- Idot, Laurence: Application du règlement à un immeuble situé dans la zone nord de Chypre, Europe 2009 Juin Comm. nº 262 p.42
- Meidanis, Haris P.: The Brussels I Regulation and the Cyprus problem before the Court of Justice. Comment on Apostolides v Orams, European Law Review 2009 p.963-975
- Koutrakos, Panos: Who wants to be Pandora? The Court of Justice and the Cyprus Problem, European Law Review 2009 p.345-346
- Samoni, K. ; Chala, S.: Armenopoulos 2009 p.1452-1455
- Karipsiadis, G.: Elliniki Epitheorisi Evropaïkou Dikaiou 2009 p.236-241
- Cortés Martín, José Manuel: Jurisprudencia del TJCE, Enero-Abril 2009, Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 2009 p.665-726
- Čihula, T.: Apostolides: K uznání a výkonu rozsudku členským státem v případě pozastavení uplatnování evropského práva na území jiného členského státu, Jurisprudence : specialista na komentování judikatury 2009 nº 5 p.39-43
- Avbelj, Matej: Sodna uzurpacija ciprskega vprašanja?, Pravna praksa 2009 nº 18 p.24-25
- Garau Sobrino, Federico F.: Jurisprudencia española y comunitaria de Derecho internacional privado, Revista española de Derecho Internacional 2009 p.209-211
- Michailidou, Chrysoula: Zitimata anagnorisis kai ektelesis apofasis ekdotheisas apo dikastirio tis Kyprou schetika me akinito keimeno se periochi mi elegchomeni apo tin kyvernisi tou kratous aftou, Efarmoges Astikou Dikaiou 2009 p.753-759
- De Baere, Geert: Case C-420/07, Meletis Apostolides v. David Charles Orams, Linda Elizabeth Orams, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 28 April 2009, [2009] ECR I-3571, Common Market Law Review 2010 Vol.47 Nº 4 p.1123-1159
- Samoni, K. ; Chala, S.: Armenopoulos 2010 p.301-303
- Kanellopoulos, Panagiotis: Evropaion Politeia 2010 p.123-126
- Chatzimichail, Nikita: O Evropaïkos Dikastikos Choros Politikis Dikaiosynis kai to Kypriako provlima: Skepseis me Aformi tin Ypothesi Orams, Seira imeridon - Ekdosi tou IDNM se synergasia me to Panepistimio Kyprou - Τo kypriako provlima se exelixi : diethnis diastasi, zitimata diakyvernisis, anthropina dikaiomata 2010 p.113-138
- Molina del Pozo, Carlos F. ; Archontaki, Chrysoula: Ejecución en el Reino Unido de Sentencias dictadas en la República de Chipre (Comentario a la Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de 28 de abril de 2009, Apostolides, As. C-420/07), Noticias de la Unión Europea 2011 nº 314 p.3-13
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) - United Kingdom
Subject-matter
- area of freedom, security and justice
- - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
- Accession
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Convention européenne de sauvegarde des Droits de l'Homme et des Libertés fondamentales (04/11/1950), art. 6
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General
Kokott
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion