Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 2004/38 -A27P2 : paragraph 40
• Directive 2004/114 -A01 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2004/114 -A01LA : paragraph 34
• Directive 2004/114 -A03P1 : paragraph 5
• Directive 2004/114 -A05 : paragraphs 6, 31
• Directive 2004/114 -A06 : paragraphs 7, 31, 33, 36, 37
• Directive 2004/114 -A06P1LD : paragraphs 1, 28, 29, 32, 38, 40, 42, 45, 48, 50
• Directive 2004/114 -A07 : paragraphs 28, 31, 33, 36, 37
• Directive 2004/114 -A07P1 : paragraph 8
• Directive 2004/114 -A08 : paragraph 28
• Directive 2004/114 -A09 : paragraph 28
• Directive 2004/114 -A10 : paragraph 28
• Directive 2004/114 -A11 : paragraph 28
• Directive 2004/114 -A12 : paragraphs 9, 33
• Directive 2004/114 -A18P2 : paragraphs 10, 44
• Directive 2004/114 -A18P4 : paragraphs 10, 46
• Directive 2004/114 -C14 : paragraphs 3, 32, 40, 44
• Directive 2004/114 -C15 : paragraphs 3, 44
• Directive 2004/114 -C24 : paragraphs 3, 34
• Directive 2004/114 -C6 : paragraphs 3, 35
• Directive 2004/114 -C7 : paragraphs 3, 35
• Regulation 267/2012 -A23P2LD : paragraph 11
• Regulation 267/2012 -N9 : paragraphs 11, 12, 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/90 -N14 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/06 -N69 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/08 -N60 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/08 -N61 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/09 -N43 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/09 -N44 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/09 -N30 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/11 -N39 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -84/12 -N56 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -84/12 -N57 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -84/12 -N60 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N22 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N23 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N24 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N27 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N28 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N30 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N33 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N34 : paragraph 44
• General Court - Judgment T -181/13 : paragraph 24
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/14 -N69 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14 -N84 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -304/14 -N40 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -601/15 -N66 : paragraph 39

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2004/114 -A06P1LD

Opinion

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 61 -LA : point 30
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 15 -P3 : point 29
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 45 -P2 : point 29
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : point 75
  
• TFEU, Article 18 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 21 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 26 -P2 : point 30
  
• TFEU, Article 36 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 45 -P3 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 46 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 50 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 52 -P1 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 52 -P2 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 56 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 59 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 61 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 65 -P1LB : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 72 : point 61
  
• TFEU, Article 79 : points 30, 61
  
• TFEU, Article 79 -P2 : point 32
  
• TFEU, Article 202 : point 51
  
• TFEU, Article 267 : point 23
  
• Directive 2004/38 : points 51, 60
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A27P2 : points 55, 68
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A27P3 : point 55
  
• Directive 2004/114 : points 3, 26, 30, 32 - 34, 37, 61, 68, 75
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A01 : point 4
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A03P1 : point 5
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A05 : point 7
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A06 : points 8, 30, 40 - 42, 63, 67
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A06P1LD : points 21, 24, 25, 47, 48, 53, 54, 57, 58, 60, 80
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A07 : points 21, 30, 40 - 42, 58, 63, 67
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A08 : points 21, 30, 58
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A09 : points 21, 58
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A10 : points 21, 58
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A11 : points 21, 58
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A12 : point 40
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A18 : point 9
  
• Directive 2004/114 -A18P4 : point 74
  
• Directive 2004/114 -C6 : point 32
  
• Directive 2004/114 -C7 : point 32
  
• Directive 2004/114 -C14 : point 66
  
• Directive 2005/71 : point 34
  
• Regulation 562/2006 : point 43
  
• Regulation 562/2006 -A05 : point 45
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A07P4 : point 50
  
• Regulation 810/2009 : point 43
  
• Regulation 810/2009 -A21P1 : point 64
  
• Regulation 810/2009 -A32P1 : points 44, 64
  
• Regulation 810/2009 -A32P1LAPTVI : point 53
  
• Regulation 810/2009 -A35P6 : point 64
  
• Regulation 267/2012 -A23P2LD : point 10
  
• Regulation 267/2012 -N9 : point 62
  
• Regulation 1202/2014 : point 24
  
• Regulation 1202/2014 -NPT1.1 : point 11
  
• Regulation 1202/2014 -NPT1.161 : points 11, 62
  
• Directive 2016/801 -A41 : point 34
  
• Directive 2016/801 -C3 : point 35
  
• Directive 2016/801 -C6 : point 35
  
• Directive 2016/801 -C7 : point 35
  
• Directive 2016/801 -C8 : point 35
  
• Directive 2016/801 -C11 : point 35
  
• Directive 2016/801 -C13 : point 35
  
• Directive 2016/801 -C14 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/01 -N12 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/01 -N35 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/05 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/05 -N344 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -549/07 -N17 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/09 -N45 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/09 -N46 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/09 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/09 -N23 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/09 -N28 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -430/10 -N32 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -84/12 -N47 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -84/12 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -84/12 -N60 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -84/12 -N61 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -84/12 -N63 : points 44, 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -575/12 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -575/12 -N62 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -119/13 -N33 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -260/13 -N43 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 : points 38, 40, 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N16 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N27 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N33 : points 40, 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/13 -N35 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -554/13 -N48 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -165/14 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -165/14 -N170 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -304/14 -N36 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -304/14 -N39 : point 52
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 19/10/2015

Date of the Opinion

• 29/11/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

04/04/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 168 from 29.05.2017, p.12

Application: OJ C 429 from 21.12.2015, p.13

Name of the parties

Fahimian

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Gazin, Fabienne: Étudiants ressortissants de pays tiers, Europe 2017 Avril nº 06 p.22 (FR)
2. Buckler, Julius: Personenfreizügigkeit: Bedingungen für Drittstaatsangehörige betreffend eines Visums zu Studienzwecken, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2017 p.476-477 (DE)
3. Buchheim, Johannes: Europarecht : Gegenstand der Entscheidung des EuGH ist die Versagung eines Visums für eine iranische Studentin, die in Deutschland im Bereich Verschlüsselungstechnologie promovieren wollte, aus Sicherheitsgründen. Der EuGH hält auf Vorlage des VG Berlin die Versagung für vereinbar mit der maßgeblichen RiL 2004/114/EG. Johannes Buchheim (JZ 2017, 630) kritisiert das Urteil, das sich in eine Abschottungsstrategie der EU füge, insbesondere aufgrund der Einräumung eines gerichtlich nur eingeschränkt überprüfbaren Beurteilungsspielraums der nationalen Behörden hinsichtlich des Begriffs der (potentiellen) ,,Gefahr für die öffentliche Sicherheit"., Juristenzeitung 2017 p.630-634 (DE)
4. Overmars, Arno ; Terlouw, A.B.: Angst voor misbruik van kennis, Asiel en Migrantenrecht 2017 p.334-340 (NL)
5. Oosterom-Staples, H.: Over openbare veiligheid in het migratierecht; het prijskaartje voor onze vrijheid?, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2017 p.165-172 (NL)
6. Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Leboeuf, Luc: Droit européen des migrations, Journal de droit européen 2018 p.95-110 (FR)
7. Widdershoven, R.J.G.M.: Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2018 nº 695-697 (NL)
8. Eisele, Katharina: Public security and admission to the EU of foreign students: Fahimian, Common Market Law Review 2018, Volume 55, Issue 1, p. 279-294 (EN)
9. Pleniceanu, Aurelia-Mădălina: Siguranţă publică şi cetăţeanul unei ţări terţe. Cauza Fahimian - execţia de la regulă., Revista românã de drept european 2019 nº 1 p.74-85 (RO)
10. Pleniceanu, Aurelia-Mădălina: Cauza Fahimian : C-544/15, Revista românã de drept european 2019 nº 1 p. 74-85 (RO)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin - Germany

Subject-matter

• area of freedom, security and justice
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Regan

Advocate General

Szpunar

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French