Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 11 : paragraphs 18, 49, 54
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 17 -P2 : paragraph 54
• Directive 2001/29 -A03P1 : paragraphs 1, 16, 18 - 20, 23, 24, 26, 29, 30, 33, 36, 44, 50, 54, 55
• Directive 2001/29 -A03P3 : paragraphs 17, 28, 50, 53
• Directive 2001/29 -A06P1 : paragraphs 5, 46
• Directive 2001/29 -A06P3 : paragraphs 5, 46
• Directive 2001/29 -C3 : paragraphs 3, 54
• Directive 2001/29 -C4 : paragraphs 3, 27
• Directive 2001/29 -C9 : paragraphs 3, 27
• Directive 2001/29 -C10 : paragraphs 3, 27
• Directive 2001/29 -C23 : paragraphs 3, 26
• Directive 2001/29 -C31 : paragraphs 3, 54
• Directive 2014/26 -A16 : paragraph 14
• Directive 2014/26 -A16P1 : paragraph 6
• Directive 2014/26 -A16P2 : paragraph 6
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -607/11 -N23 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/12 -N24 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/12 -N25 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/12 -N27 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N20 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N22 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N23 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N24 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N25 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N26 : paragraphs 36, 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N27 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N28 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N29 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N30 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N31 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Order C -348/13 : paragraphs 18, 44
• Court of Justice - Order C -348/13 -N16 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Order C -348/13 -N18 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 -N43 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 -N45 : paragraph 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 -N46 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/15 -N36 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -610/15 -N23 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -265/16 -N45 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -265/16 -N49 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N18 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N29 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N32 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N33 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N34 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N35 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N41 : paragraph 54
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/17 -N81 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/18 -N49 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/18 -N66 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/18 -N70 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -753/18 -N30 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -753/18 -N31 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -753/18 -N32 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -392/19 : paragraphs 25, 47, 51
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/19 -N22 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/19 -N23 : paragraph 30

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2001/29 -A03P1

Opinion

• Directive 2001/29 : points 59, 65
  
• Directive 2001/29 -A02LC : point 61
  
• Directive 2001/29 -A03P1 : points 16, 19, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 38, 42, 43, 45, 47, 51, 52, 55, 60, 76, 80, 81, 96, 113, 119, 132, 139
  
• Directive 2001/29 -A03P2 : point 34
  
• Directive 2001/29 -A03P3 : points 16, 57
  
• Directive 2001/29 -A05P3LD : point 108
  
• Directive 2001/29 -A05P3LK : point 108
  
• Directive 2001/29 -A06 : points 133, 134, 136 - 139
  
• Directive 2001/29 -A06P1 : points 17, 20
  
• Directive 2001/29 -A06P3 : point 17
  
• Directive 2001/29 -C9 : point 131
  
• Directive 2001/29 -C31 : points 115, 131
  
• Directive 2014/26 -A16P1 : points 18, 21
  
• Directive 2014/26 -A16P2 : point 21
  
• Directive 2014/26 -A16P2L1 : point 18
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -293/98 -N22 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -306/05 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -306/05 -N40 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/12 -N25 : point 136
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 : points 45, 52, 66, 72, 91, 111
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N1 : point 15
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N18 : points 36, 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N19 : points 36, 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N20 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N22 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N24 : points 38, 56, 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N25 : points 37, 56
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N26 : points 37, 56
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N27 : points 37, 39, 56
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N29 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/12 -N31 : points 39, 127
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -348/13 : points 40, 109, 113
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -348/13 -N4 : point 112
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -348/13 -N5 : point 111
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -348/13 -N17 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N48 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N49 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N50 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N51 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N52 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N53 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N54 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N55 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N56 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N57 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N58 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N59 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -160/15 -N60 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -610/15 -N3 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 : points 53, 91, 112
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 -N43 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 -N44 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 -N45 : points 5, 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 -N46 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 -N47 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 -N48 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 -N49 : points 42, 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 -N51 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/15 -N33 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/15 -N34 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/15 -N35 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/15 -N36 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/15 -N38 : point 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -527/15 -N1 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -527/15 -N50 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -610/15 -N37 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 : points 68, 71, 93, 101, 125
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N27 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N29 : point 104
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N30 : points 95, 99
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N33 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N35 : points 70, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N36 : point 130
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N40 : point 117
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N44 : point 99
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N45 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N46 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -476/17 -N1 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N94 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N95 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N96 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N97 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N98 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N99 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N100 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N101 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N102 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N103 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N104 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N105 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/18 -N106 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/18 -N70 : point 55
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 21/05/2019

Date of the Opinion

• 10/09/2020

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

09/03/2021

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

VG Bild-Kunst

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Grünberger, Michael: Medienspezifische Zugangsregeln im Internet : framing/embedding : Zugleich Besprechung von EuGH, Urteil vom 9.3.2021 – C-392/19 – VG Bild-Kunst/Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 2021 p. 395-400 (DE)
2. Lucas-Schloetter, Agnès: Droit d’auteur et droits voisins. Droits patrimoniaux. Droit de communication au public, Propriétés intellectuelles 2021 n° 79 p. 95-98 (FR)
3. Simon, Denys: Propriété intellectuelle - Droits d'auteur, Europe 2021, nº 5 Mai, comm. 183 (FR)
4. Gernhardt, Franz: Framing als öffentliche Wiedergabe nach dem Urteil VG Bild-Kunst/Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz des EuGH (Urt. v. 9.3.2021 – C-392/19), Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht PRAX 2021 p. 363-365 (DE)
5. Engels, Charlie: VG Bild-Kunst/Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz : noot : (C-392/19), AMI: Tijdschrift voor auteurs-, media & informatierecht 2021 p. 158-160 (NL)
6. Seignette, Jacqueline M.B.: VG Bild-Kunst/Stiftung Pressischer Kulturbesitz : noot, Intellectuele eigendom & Reclamerecht 2021 p. 201-203 (NL)
7. Mezei, Péter ; Jütte, Bernd Justin: CJEU clarifies that framing infringes copyright if TPMs are circumvented : VG Bild-Kunst v Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz, C-392/19, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 2021 p. 461-463 (EN)
8. Rosati, Eleonora: Linking and copyright in the shade of VG Bild-Kunst : case C-392/19, VG Bild-Kunst v. Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Common Market Law Review 2021 p. 1875-1894 (EN)
9. Benabou, Valérie-Laure: La Cour de justice persiste et signe sur les liens ou comment se cogner « la tête contre les murs », Dalloz IP / IT 2021, nº 6, p. 334-338 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Bundesgerichtshof - Germany

Subject-matter

• Freedom of establishment
  
• Freedom to provide services
  
• Approximation of laws
  
• Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Ilešič

Advocate General

Szpunar

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French