Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.10 Tax provisions
4.10.02 Harmonization of tax legislation
4.10.02.01 Value added tax
4.10.02.01.08 Deductions and refunds
4.10.02.01.08.04 Rules governing exercise of the right of deduction
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
TFEU, Article 267
: paragraph 41
-
Directive 2006/112
-A63 : paragraphs 1, 3, 24 - 26, 44
-
Directive 2006/112
-A167 : paragraphs 1, 4, 24 - 26, 29, 33, 44
-
Directive 2006/112
-A168 : paragraphs 1, 5, 24 - 26, 44
-
Directive 2006/112
-A168LA : paragraph 31
-
Directive 2006/112
-A178 : paragraphs 1, 6, 24 - 26, 44
-
Directive 2006/112
-A178LA : paragraph 32
-
Directive 2006/112
-A179 : paragraphs 1, 7, 24 - 26, 44
-
Directive 2006/112
-A179L1 : paragraph 34
-
Directive 2006/112
-A180 : paragraphs 1, 8, 24 - 26, 35, 44
-
Directive 2006/112
-A182 : paragraphs 1, 9, 24 - 26, 35, 44
-
Directive 2006/112
-A219 : paragraphs 1, 10, 25, 26, 44
-
Directive 2006/112
-A273 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/06
-N23 : paragraph 41
-
Court of Justice - Order C -469/12
-N28 : paragraph 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -332/15
-N52 : paragraph 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N37 : paragraph 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N38 : paragraph 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N39 : paragraph 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N40 : paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N41 : paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N42 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N43 : paragraph 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N45 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N46 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N47 : paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N48 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/16
-N50 : paragraph 43
Operative part
Opinion
-
Directive 2006/112
-A63 : point 17
-
Directive 2006/112
-A73 : points 32, 33, 70
-
Directive 2006/112
-A90 : points 63, 66
-
Directive 2006/112
-A167 : point 17
-
Directive 2006/112
-A168 : points 5, 17, 30, 34, 50, 56
-
Directive 2006/112
-A168LA : points 29, 71
-
Directive 2006/112
-A178 : points 6, 17, 47, 50
-
Directive 2006/112
-A178LA : points 34, 36, 37, 52, 56, 71
-
Directive 2006/112
-A179 : point 17
-
Directive 2006/112
-A179L1 : point 35
-
Directive 2006/112
-A180 : point 17
-
Directive 2006/112
-A182 : point 17
-
Directive 2006/112
-A184 : points 63, 66
-
Directive 2006/112
-A185 : points 63, 66
-
Directive 2006/112
-A203 : points 50, 61, 66
-
Directive 2006/112
-A219 : point 17
-
Directive 2006/112
-A219BIS : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A220 : points 36, 50
-
Directive 2006/112
-A221 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A222 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A223 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A224 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A225 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A226 : points 7, 36, 61
-
Directive 2006/112
-A226PT6 : point 55
-
Directive 2006/112
-A226PT7 : point 55
-
Directive 2006/112
-A226PT10 : points 34, 40, 49, 52, 66, 71
-
Directive 2006/112
-A227 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A228 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A229 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A230 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A231 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A232 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A233 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A234 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A235 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A236 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A237 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A238 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A239 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-A240 : point 36
-
Directive 2006/112
-TIT10CH1 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/87
-N15 : point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -283/95
-N22 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/97
-N20 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/99
-N19 : point 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -90/02
-N39 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/02
-N34 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/02
-N35 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/02
-N38 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -25/03
-N57 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -63/04
-N25 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -63/04
-N51 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -35/05
-N23 : point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -437/06
-N25 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -253/07
-N30 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -368/09
-N37 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -385/09
-N42 : point 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -438/09
-N23 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -438/09
-N24 : point 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/10
-N27 : point 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/10
-N43 : point 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/11
-N35 : point 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/12
-N26 : point 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/13
-N41 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/13
-N43 : point 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -341/13
-N32 : point 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -590/13
-N41 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -590/13
-N42 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -516/14
-N30 : point 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -183/14
-N58 : point 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -183/14
-N59 : point 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -277/14
-N28 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/14
: point 4
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/14
-N27 : point 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/14
-N39 : point 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/14
-N40 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/14
-N42 : point 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/14
-N43 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/14
: point 4
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/14
-N27 : point 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/14
-N28 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/14
-N35 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/14
-N39 : points 56, 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/15
-N31 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/15
-N34 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/15
-N35 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -332/15
-N47 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -246/16
-N27 : point 63
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -396/16
-N56 : point 63
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -533/16
-N58 : point 47
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -533/16
-N60 : point 37
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -533/16
-N64 : points 44, 48
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -533/16
-N67 : point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/16
-N39 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/16
-N40 : point 28
-
Court of Justice - Order C -28/16
-N28 : point 29
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
12/04/2018
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 200 from 11.06.2018, p.12
Application: OJ C 95 from 27.03.2017, p.5
Name of the parties
Biosafe - Indústria de Reciclagens
Notes on Academic Writings
- Cazet, Safia: Taux de TVA erroné sur la facture : quelle incidence sur le droit à réduction ?, Europe 2018 Juin Comm. nº 6 p.28 (FR)
- Buge, Ronald: Vorsteuerabzug nach Rechnungkorrektur, Ausschlussfrist, Umsatz-Steuerberater 2018 n° 02 p.33-34 (DE)
- Hartman, Timo: Mehrwertsteuerausweis in Rechnungen als materielle Voraussetzung des Vorsteuerabzugs?, Umsatzsteuer-Rundschau 2018 p.392-398 (DE)
- Heinrichshofen, Stefan: Keine Versagung des Vorsteuerabzugs wegen Ablaufs einer Ausschlussfrist bei Zahlung einer nacherhobenen Steuer, die erstmals in Dokumenten zur Berichtigung der ursprünglichen Rechnungen ausgewiesen ist, Umsatzsteuer-Rundschau 2018 p.402-404 (DE)
- Von Streit, Georg: Entstehung des Anspruchs auf Vorsteuerabzug bei fehlerhafter Rechnung - EuGH, Schlussanträge GA Kokott v. 30.11.2017 - C-8/17, Biosafe - Indústria de Reciclagens SA, Mehrwertsteuerrecht 2018 p.136-138 (DE)
- Stoicescu, Izabela ; Andras, Erika: Radiografia recentă a dreptului de deducere a TVA în jurisprudenţa europeană, Curierul Fiscal 2018 nº 4 p.129-132 (RO)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça - Portugal
Subject-matter
- Taxation
- - Value added tax
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
septième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Jarašiūnas
Advocate General
Kokott
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion