Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 1 -L2 : paragraphs 33, 79
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 2 : paragraph 37
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 2 -LC : paragraphs 28, 33, 62, 79
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 37 -L1 : paragraph 40
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 40 : paragraph 33
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 41 : paragraph 33
• 11957A106BIS -P3 : paragraphs 32, 34, 40, 42, 46
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 192 -L1 : paragraph 79
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Annex II -PT11 : paragraph 33
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 20 : paragraph 73
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 37 : paragraphs 36, 42, 100
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A58L1 : paragraph 91
• TFEU, Article 11 : paragraphs 36, 42, 100
• TFEU, Article 26 -P2 : paragraph 101
• TFEU, Article 107 : paragraphs 32, 36
• TFEU, Article 107 -P1 : paragraphs 5, 138
• TFEU, Article 107 -P3LB : paragraph 20
• TFEU, Article 107 -P3LC : paragraphs 1, 5, 8, 16, 18, 20, 24 - 26, 30, 31, 39, 45, 52 - 54, 60 - 64, 66, 67, 84, 98, 100, 101, 106, 111 - 113, 119, 129
• TFEU, Article 108 -P3 : paragraph 84
• TFEU, Article 194 : paragraph 36
• TFEU, Article 194 -P1 : paragraphs 42, 100
• TFEU, Article 194 -P1LA : paragraph 48
• TFEU, Article 194 -P1LB : paragraph 48
• TFEU, Article 194 -P2L2 : paragraphs 48, 79
• TFEU, Article 256 : paragraph 91
• Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31994Y0310(01) : paragraph 107
• Regulation 794/2004 -A04P1 : paragraphs 125, 131
• Directive 2011/92 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A169P2 : paragraphs 59, 91
• Decision 2015/658 : paragraph 1
• Decision 2015/658 -A01L1 : paragraph 5
• Regulation 1589/2015 -A01LC : paragraphs 125, 131
• Regulation 2015/2282 : paragraph 55
• Commission - Other Acts - 52008XC0620(02) : paragraph 123
• Commission - Other Acts - 52013XC0126(01) : paragraph 22
• Commission - Other Acts - 52013XC0723(03) : paragraph 22
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0627(01) : paragraph 22
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0628(01) : paragraph 22
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -730/79 -N24 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -730/79 -N25 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -730/79 -N26 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/85 -N18 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -86/89 -N18 : paragraph 119
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/91 -N28 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/96 -N88 : paragraph 119
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/96 -N89 : paragraph 119
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/96 -N90 : paragraph 119
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/96 -N91 : paragraph 119
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/98 -N76 : paragraph 109
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/98 -N77 : paragraph 109
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -113/00 -N67 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/05 -N65 : paragraph 24
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/06 -N50 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/06 -N51 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -113/07 -N81 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/08 -N87 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/08 -N88 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/08 -N89 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/08 -N90 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/08 -N91 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/10 -N33 : paragraph 119
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/10 -N34 : paragraph 119
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/10 -N35 : paragraph 119
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/10 -N36 : paragraph 119
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/10 -N38 : paragraph 25
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -584/10 -N150 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -628/10 -N111 : paragraph 131
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -625/13 -N69 : paragraph 91
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -431/14 -N68 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -431/14 -N69 : paragraph 24
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -330/15 -N33 : paragraph 131
• General Court - Judgment T -356/15 : paragraphs 1 - 152
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -300/16 -N70 : paragraph 85
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/17 -N24 : paragraph 59
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -411/17 -N76 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -411/17 -N156 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -515/17 -N47 : paragraph 68

Operative part

• Confirms : General Court - Judgment T -356/15

Opinion

• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 1 : points 5, 63, 78
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 1 -P2 : point 74
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 2 : points 5, 37
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 2 -LB : point 84
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 2 -LC : points 30, 33, 63, 74, 78
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 37 : point 90
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 40 : point 74
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 41 : point 74
  
• 11957A106BIS : point 31
  
• 11957A106BIS -P1 : point 34
  
• 11957A106BIS -P3 : points 5, 33, 34, 43, 63, 82 - 86, 151
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 192 : point 74
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 192 -P1 : point 5
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 92 -P3LC : points 66, 68
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 305 -P2 : point 34
  
• Treaty of Lisbon 2007, Protocol B 2 : point 34
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 37 : points 31, 39, 83
  
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A36 : point 96
  
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A58L1 : point 95
  
• TFEU, Article 4 -P2LI : point 86
  
• TFEU, Article 11 : points 31, 83
  
• TFEU, Article 26 -P2 : point 116
  
• TFEU, Article 106 -P2 : point 110
  
• TFEU, Article 107 : points 38, 83, 86, 112, 113, 117
  
• TFEU, Article 107 -P1 : point 110
  
• TFEU, Article 107 -P2 : points 104, 110, 115, 151
  
• TFEU, Article 107 -P3 : points 104, 110, 115, 131, 133, 151
  
• TFEU, Article 107 -P3LB : points 54, 58, 59, 151
  
• TFEU, Article 107 -P3LC : points 1, 4, 5, 13, 26, 31, 44, 46, 47, 49, 50, 52 - 54, 56 - 60, 64, 68, 70, 71, 73, 87, 89, 90, 92, 93, 95, 100 - 102, 104, 107, 110, 119, 123, 127, 139, 140, 144, 151
  
• TFEU, Article 108 : point 38
  
• TFEU, Article 109 : point 38
  
• TFEU, Article 157 -P1 : point 37
  
• TFEU, Article 192 -P2 : point 5
  
• TFEU, Article 192 -P2L1LC : point 86
  
• TFEU, Article 194 -P1 : point 86
  
• TFEU, Article 194 -P1LC : point 31
  
• TFEU, Article 194 -P2 : points 3, 5, 86, 87, 99, 109, 151
  
• TFEU, Article 194 -P2L1 : point 86
  
• TFEU, Article 194 -P2L2 : points 33, 42, 43, 79
  
• TFEU, Article 256 -P1L2 : point 95
  
• TFEU, Article 263 -L4 : point 100
  
• TFEU, Article 296 -L2 : point 96
  
• TFEU, Article 296 -P2 : point 93
  
• Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31994Y0310(01) : point 120
  
• Regulation 659/1999 : point 6
  
• Regulation 794/2004 -A04 : points 7, 141
  
• Regulation 794/2004 -A04P1 : points 136, 141
  
• Decision 2005/370 -A09P3 : point 1
  
• Opinion - 32012A0207(01) : point 90
  
• Regulation 651/2014 -A07 : point 134
  
• Regulation 651/2014 -A08 : point 134
  
• Regulation 651/2014 -C23 : point 134
  
• Regulation 651/2014 -C25 : point 134
  
• Decision 2015/658 : point 2
  
• Decision 2015/658 -C336 : point 144
  
• Decision 2015/658 -C337 : point 144
  
• Decision 2015/658 -C338 : point 144
  
• Decision 2015/658 -C339 : point 144
  
• Decision 2015/658 -C374 : point 47
  
• Decision 2015/658 -C382 : point 103
  
• Decision 2015/658 -C383 : point 103
  
• Decision 2015/658 -C384 : point 103
  
• Decision 2015/658 -C385 : point 103
  
• Decision 2015/658 -C392 : point 95
  
• Decision 2015/658 -C472 : points 147, 149
  
• Secondary Legislation - Internal Act of the Institutions - 32015Q0423(01) -A117LM : point 96
  
• Regulation 1589/2015 -A01LC : points 6, 136, 141
  
• Regulation 1589/2015 -A02 : point 141
  
• Regulation 1589/2015 -N1 : point 141
  
• Decision 2019/274 : point 23
  
• Decision 2020/48 : point 23
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52008XC0620(02) -PT3.2.A : points 138, 144
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52008XC0620(02) -PT3.2.D : point 144
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52008XC0620(02) -PT3.2 : point 8
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52008XC0620(02) -PT4.1.A : point 138
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52008XC0620(02) -PT4.2 : points 137, 145
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52008XC0620(02) -PT5.1 : point 9
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52008XC0620(02) -PT5.2 : point 9
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52013XC0126(01) -PT33 : point 51
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52013XC0723(03) -PT26 : point 51
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0307(07) : points 12, 51
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0627(01) -CH3 : point 51
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0628(01) -CH3.1 : point 51
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52016XC0504(03) : point 90
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52016XC0719(05) : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -25/62 : point 100
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -730/79 -N24 : points 50, 65, 67 - 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -730/79 -N25 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -730/79 -N26 : points 51, 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/85 -N18 : points 50, 51, 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/88 -N17 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -86/89 : point 131
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/91 -N41 : point 90
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion 1/94 -N24 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/98 -N74 : point 50
  
• General Court - Judgment T -158/99 -N159 : point 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/00 -N53 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -113/00 -N67 : points 51, 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/03 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/03 -N44 : point 37
  
• General Court - Judgment T -289/03 -N314 : point 118
  
• General Court - Judgment T -289/03 -N315 : point 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/05 -N59 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/05 -N60 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/05 -N65 : point 52
  
• General Court - Judgment T -162/06 -N74 : point 55
  
• General Court - Judgment T -177/07 : points 58, 151
  
• General Court - Judgment T -177/07 -N125 : points 45, 47, 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/08 -N87 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/08 -N88 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/08 -N89 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/08 -N90 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/08 -N91 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/09 -N64 : point 96
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/10 : point 131
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/10 -N38 : point 52
  
• General Court - Judgment T -57/11 -N185 : point 90
  
• General Court - Judgment T -57/11 -N189 : points 89, 116
  
• General Court - Judgment T -57/11 -N190 : point 90
  
• General Court - Judgment T -251/11 -N208 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/13 : point 112
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/13 -N65 : point 111
  
• General Court - Judgment T -162/13 -N81 : point 104
  
• General Court - Judgment T -162/13 -N116 : point 123
  
• General Court - Judgment T -162/13 -N117 : point 123
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -5/14 -N31 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -5/14 -N32 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -5/14 -N33 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -5/14 -N34 : point 36
  
• General Court - Judgment T -356/15 : point 1
  
• General Court - Order T -382/15 -N55 : point 100
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -640/16 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -411/17 -N42 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -411/17 : point 37
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 21/09/2018

Date of the Opinion

• 07/05/2020

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

22/09/2020

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Austria v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Idot, Laurence: Aides d'État - Aides en faveur d'une centrale nucléaire, Europe 2020, n° 11 Novembre, Comm. 349 (FR)
2. Eidissen, Stig: Common interest as a condition for state aid compatibility : Case C-594/18 P, European State Aid Law Quarterly 2020 p. 452-463 (EN)
3. Sikora, Alicja: Applicability of the EU state aid and environmental rules in the nuclear energy sector : annotation on the judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020 in case C-594/18 P Republic of Austria v Commission, European State Aid Law Quarterly 2020 p. 515-520 (EN)
4. Dewispelaere, Jeroen ; Boucquey, Raphaël: Het arrest Hinkley Point C : naar een verregaande integratie van de regels inzake staatssteun en de Unierechtelijke voorschriften op milieugebied : C-594/18 P, Oostenrijk/Commissie, Jaarboek energierecht 2020 2020 p. 193-225 (NL)
5. Dewispelaere, Jeroen ; Boucquey, Raphaël: Het arrest Hinkley Point C : naar een verregaande integratie van de regels inzake staatssteun en de unierechtelijke voorschriften op milieugebied : C-594/18 P, Oostenrijk/Commissie, Jaarboek energierecht 2020 2020 p. 193-225 (NL)
6. Dekker, Cees T.: De rol van het gemeenschappelijk belang bij de verenigbaarverklaring van steunmaatregelen : HvJ 22 september 2020, zaak C-594/18P, (Oostenrijk/Commissie (Hinkley), Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2021 p. 1-6 (NL)
7. Blockx, Jan: Staatssteun voor kernenergie: wettige spitstechnologie of juridische spitsvondigheid? Zaak C-594/18 P, Oostenrijk/Commissie, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2021 p. 288-292 (NL)
8. Nicolaides, Phedon: Shedding light into the ‘black box’ of state aid : the impact of Hinkley Point C on the assessment of the compatibility of state aid : C-594/18 P, European State Aid Law Quarterly 2021 p. 4-14 (EN)
9. Hancher, Leigh: Euratom, state aid and environmental protection : Hinkley Point : Case C-594/18 P, Republic of Austria v. Commission, Common Market Law Review 2021 p. 1491-1522 (EN)
10. Lovas, Dóra: Az Európai Unió Bíróságának ítélete a „Hinkley Point C" atomerőmű-beruházásról : az atomerőmű-beruházás és az állami támogatások megengedhetősége : C-594/18. P. sz. Ausztria kontra Bizottság, Jogesetek Magyarázata 2021 nº 2-3 p. 109-111 (HU)
11. Hancher, Leigh ; Bouchagiar, Antonios: Hinkley point C : trimming the SAM, while extending the reach of wider EU law infringements? : Case C-594/18 P Austria v Commission, European State Aid Law Quarterly 2021 p. 529-545 (EN)
12. Olthoff, Merit ; Von Bonin, Andreas: Das „Hinkley Point“-Urteil des EuGH: Berücksichtigung von Nachhaltigkeitsaspekten in der beihilferechtlichen Prüfung sowie allgemein im EU-Kartell- und Fusionskontrollrecht : C-594/18, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2021 p. 181-187 (DE)
13. Thieffry, Patrick: X. Environnement - Cour de justice, gde ch., 22 septembre 2020, Autriche c/ Commission, aff. C-594/18 P, ECLI:EU:C: 2020:742, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2020. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2021, p. 623-626 (FR)
14. Summer, Sibylle: Staatliche Beihilfen für neue Kernkraftanlagen : eine Zwischenbilanz nach einem langen Rechtsstreit : Rs C-594/18 P, Zeitschrift für Beihilfenrecht 2021 p. 129-134 (DE)
15. Thieffry, Patrick: Aides d'État à l'environnement : développements normatifs (retardés) et jurisprudentiels (intensifiés) au prisme du Pacte vert pour l'Europe, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2021, n° 1, p. 223-225 (FR)
16. Dekker, Cees T.: De rol van het gemeenschappelijk belang bij de verenigbaarverklaring van steunmaatregelen : HvJ 22 september 2020, zaak C-594/18P : Oostenrijk/Commissie (Hinkley), Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2021 p. 1-6 (NL)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• - State aid
  
• Energy
  
• Euratom matters
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Actions for annulment
  
• Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
  
• Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Jarukaitis

Advocate General

Hogan

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English