Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 April 2019

ClientEarth v European Commission

REACH — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) — Request for internal review of a decision on marketing authorisation rejected as unfounded — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006

Case T-108/17



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
17/05/2019 ClientEarth v Commission
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2019:215
04/04/2019 ClientEarth v Commission
Abstract
ECLI:EU:T:2019:215
04/04/2019 ClientEarth v Commission
Application (OJ)
31/03/2017 ClientEarth v Commission
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
3 Legal proceedings
  3.02 Actions for annulment
    3.02.00 General
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.23 Environment, sustainable development and climate
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.15 Chemicals
      4.11.15.01 Chemical substances (REACH)
        4.11.15.01.04 Authorisation requirement
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.15 Chemicals
      4.11.15.01 Chemical substances (REACH)
        4.11.15.01.05 Substances of very high concern
          4.11.15.01.05.01 Identification procedure
            4.11.15.01.05.01.02 Examination and identification criteria
3 Legal proceedings
  3.08 Procedural rules
    3.08.04 Subject-matter, form of order sought and pleas in law
      3.08.04.01 Formal requirements
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.15 Chemicals
      4.11.15.01 Chemical substances (REACH)
        4.11.15.01.05 Substances of very high concern
          4.11.15.01.05.01 Identification procedure
            4.11.15.01.05.01.02 Examination and identification criteria
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.15 Chemicals
      4.11.15.01 Chemical substances (REACH)
        4.11.15.01.05 Substances of very high concern
          4.11.15.01.05.01 Identification procedure
            4.11.15.01.05.01.02 Examination and identification criteria
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.01 Sources of EU law
    1.01.02 General principles of law
      1.01.02.11 Precautionary principle
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.15 Chemicals
      4.11.15.01 Chemical substances (REACH)
        4.11.15.01.05 Substances of very high concern
          4.11.15.01.05.01 Identification procedure
            4.11.15.01.05.01.02 Examination and identification criteria
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.05 Legal acts of the European Union
    2.05.06 Statement of reasons


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 17/02/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

04/04/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 187 from 03.06.2019, p.66

Application: OJ C 121 from 18.04.2017, p.41

Name of the parties

ClientEarth v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Approximation of laws
  • Environment
  • Public health

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

cinquième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Dittrich

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available