Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7 : paragraphs 32, 33, 47, 52, 55, 60
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8 : paragraphs 1, 27, 32, 33, 47, 52, 55, 60
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 : paragraphs 1, 27, 32
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P1 : paragraph 25
• Directive 95/46 : paragraphs 3, 8
• Directive 95/46 -A01 : paragraph 4
• Directive 95/46 -A03P1 : paragraphs 5, 34
• Directive 95/46 -A06 : paragraphs 6, 36
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1LC : paragraphs 30, 33, 48, 60
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1LE : paragraphs 1, 27, 28
• Directive 95/46 -A07 : paragraphs 7, 36 - 38
• Directive 95/46 -A07LA : paragraph 41
• Directive 95/46 -A07LF : paragraphs 1, 27, 31 - 33, 39 - 44, 46, 52, 53, 56, 60
• Regulation 679/2016 : paragraph 3
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N40 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N45 : paragraph 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 -N71 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N25 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N34 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N57 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N62 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -13/16 -N28 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -13/16 -N30 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -13/16 -N32 : paragraph 54

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 95/46 -A06P1LC
• Interprets : Directive 95/46 -A07LF
• Interprets : Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7
• Interprets : Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8

Opinion

Information not available

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 06/11/2018

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

11/12/2019

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 54 from 17.02.2020, p.8

Application: OJ C 65 from 18.02.2019, p.23

Name of the parties

Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Sauron, Jean-Luc: Vidéosurveillance et protection des données personnelles dans un immeuble d'habitation, Gazette du Palais 2020 nº 3 Jur. p.26-27 (FR)
2. Gazin, Fabienne: Droits fondamentaux - Protection des données, Europe 2020 Février Comm. nº 39 p.39 (FR)
3. Flett, Emma ; Clover, Jacqueline: Is your video surveillance legitimate under EU data protection rules?, Computer and Telecommunications Law Review 2020 p. 164-166 (EN)
4. A., I.: Video Surveillance in Common Parts of Building, Computer Law Review International 2020 p. 26-29 (EN)
5. Bertaldó, András: Szabadság vagy biztonság ? : videómegfigyelő rendszerek a C-708/17. számú ítélet tükrében, Európai jog 2020 6. szám p. 33-36 (HU)
6. Aertgeerts, Pieter: TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA: Some CJEU Guidance on the Use of Video Surveillance in Apartment Buildings under EU Data Protection Law, European Data Protection Law Review 2020, nº 2, p. 314-318 (EN)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Tribunalul Bucureşti - Romania

Subject-matter

• Fundamental rights
  
• - Charter of Fundamental Rights
  
• Approximation of laws
  
• Data protection
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Legea nr. 287/2009 privind Codul civil, Art. 253, 17/07/2009 Legea nr. 677/2001 privind protectia persoanelor fizice cu privire la prelucrarea datelor cu caracter personal si libera circulatie a acestor date, Art. 5 si art. 14, 21/11/2001

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Prechal

Advocate General

Pitruzzella

Language(s) of the Case

• Romanian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available