Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 191 -P2 : paragraph 66
• Directive 92/43 -A01 : paragraph 3
• Directive 92/43 -A01LI : paragraph 56
• Directive 92/43 -A02 : paragraphs 3, 4
• Directive 92/43 -A02P1 : paragraph 25
• Directive 92/43 -A02P2 : paragraph 25
• Directive 92/43 -A02P3 : paragraph 25
• Directive 92/43 -A12 : paragraphs 6, 28, 30, 48
• Directive 92/43 -A12P1 : paragraphs 5, 36
• Directive 92/43 -A12P1LA : paragraphs 26, 80
• Directive 92/43 -A12P1LD : paragraph 26
• Directive 92/43 -A13 : paragraphs 6, 28, 30, 48
• Directive 92/43 -A14 : paragraphs 6, 28, 30, 48
• Directive 92/43 -A15LA : paragraphs 6, 28, 30, 48
• Directive 92/43 -A15LB : paragraphs 6, 28, 30, 48
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1 : paragraphs 1, 6, 23, 28 - 30, 32, 36, 38, 41, 47, 49, 54, 55, 57, 58, 68
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1LA : paragraphs 34, 35, 37
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1LB : paragraphs 34, 35, 37
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1LC : paragraphs 34, 35, 37
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1LD : paragraphs 34, 35, 37
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1LE : paragraphs 10, 22 - 24, 34 - 37, 43, 44, 52, 70, 72, 74, 75, 79, 80
• Directive 92/43 -N4 : paragraphs 6, 48, 80
• Directive 92/43 -N4LA : paragraphs 5, 7, 26, 27, 31, 32, 80
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -182/02 -N14 : paragraph 50
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/04 -N111 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/04 -N110 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/04 -N115 : paragraph 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/04 -N128 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/05 -N25 : paragraph 71
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/05 -N29 : paragraph 71
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/05 -N34 : paragraphs 30, 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/05 -N47 : paragraph 74
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/05 -N29 : paragraph 68
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/05 -N31 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -164/09 -N25 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/15 -N50 : paragraph 50
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/15 -N51 : paragraph 50
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/15 -N62 : paragraph 71
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/17 -N230 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/17 -N231 : paragraph 27

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 92/43 -A16P1LE
• Interprets : Directive 92/43 -A12P1LA
• Interprets : Directive 92/43 -N4PTA

Opinion

• TFEU, Article 191 -P2 : point 92
  
• Decision 82/72 : point 85
  
• Directive 92/43 -A01LCPT3 : point 82
  
• Directive 92/43 -A01LG : point 4
  
• Directive 92/43 -A01LI : points 5, 79
  
• Directive 92/43 -A02 : points 4, 6
  
• Directive 92/43 -A02P1 : point 79
  
• Directive 92/43 -A02P2 : point 79
  
• Directive 92/43 -A02P3 : point 53
  
• Directive 92/43 -A12 : points 9, 28, 38
  
• Directive 92/43 -A12LA : point 113
  
• Directive 92/43 -A12P1 : point 7
  
• Directive 92/43 -A12P1LA : point 38
  
• Directive 92/43 -A13 : points 9, 38
  
• Directive 92/43 -A14 : point 9
  
• Directive 92/43 -A15LA : point 9
  
• Directive 92/43 -A15LB : point 9
  
• Directive 92/43 -A16 : points 28, 38, 94
  
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1 : points 9, 32, 33, 38, 39, 43, 45 - 47, 54, 63, 70, 77, 79, 80, 82, 88, 89, 100, 111, 113
  
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1LA : points 12, 40, 51, 52
  
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1LB : points 12, 32, 37, 40, 51, 52
  
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1LC : points 12, 32, 37, 40, 51, 52
  
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1LD : points 12, 40, 51, 52
  
• Directive 92/43 -A16P1LE : points 1, 3, 28, 29, 31, 33, 35, 38, 40, 46, 49 - 53, 61, 73, 93, 95, 99, 101 - 103, 105, 107, 109, 113
  
• Directive 92/43 -A16P2 : points 70, 111
  
• Directive 92/43 -A16P3LA : point 70
  
• Directive 92/43 -A16P3LD : point 111
  
• Directive 92/43 -A16P3LE : point 111
  
• Directive 92/43 -A17P1 : point 82
  
• Directive 92/43 -N4 : points 9, 40, 113
  
• Directive 92/43 -N4LA : points 8, 113
  
• Directive 2009/147 -A09 : point 45
  
• Directive 2009/147 -A09P1 : points 54, 71
  
• Directive 2009/147 -A09P1LC : points 40, 110
  
• Directive 2013/17 : point 113
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -247/85 -N7 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -118/94 -N21 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -10/96 -N39 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/02 -N44 : points 63, 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -182/02 -N10 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/03 -N31 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/03 -N53 : point 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/03 -N54 : point 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/04 -N25 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/04 -N111 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/04 -N112 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/04 -N110 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -342/05 -N24 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -342/05 -N25 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -342/05 -N49 : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/05 -N25 : points 45, 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/05 -N29 : point 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/05 -N34 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/05 -N47 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/05 -N25 : points 43, 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/05 -N27 : points 80, 86
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/05 -N29 : points 53, 91
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/05 -N31 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/05 -N42 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -164/09 -N28 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -557/15 -N67 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -557/15 -N68 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -243/15 -N66 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/15 -N47 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/15 -N50 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/15 -N51 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/15 -N62 : points 45, 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/15 -N63 : point 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/15 -N64 : point 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/15 -N65 : point 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/17 -N117 : point 63
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 01/12/2017

Date of the Opinion

• 08/05/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

10/10/2019

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 423 from 16.12.2019, p.2

Application: OJ C 63 from 19.02.2018, p.7

Name of the parties

Luonnonsuojeluyhdistys Tapiola

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Darpö, Jan: Anything Goes, but..., Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 2019 Vol.16 p.305-318 (EN)
2. Kole, S.D.P.: Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2020 nº 1/2 p.3744-3745 (NL)
3. Fleurke, Floor M. ; Trouwborst, Arie: Finse wolvenjacht: deur op een kier voor ‘ecodictie’ in het Europese natuurbeschermingsrecht?, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2020 p.35-42 (NL)
4. Thieffry, Patrick: Cour de justice, 2e ch., 10 octobre 2019, Luonnonsuojeluyhdistys Tapiola Pohjois-Savo – Kainuu ry, aff. C-647/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:851, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2019. Décisions et commentaires 2019, p. 592-597 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Korkein hallinto-oikeus - Finland

Subject-matter

• Environment
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Metsästyslaki (615/1993), 37 § 3 (159/2011), 41 § 1, 41a § 1 (159/2011), 41a § 3 (159/2011) Laki metsästyslain muuttamisesta (159/2011) Valtioneuvoston asetus metsästyslaissa säädetyistä poikkeusluvista (452/2013), 3 §, 4 § Maa- ja metsätalousministeriön asetus poikkeusluvalla sallittavasta suden metsästyksestä poronhoitoalueen ulkopuolella metsästysvuonna 2015—2016 (1488/2015), 1 §

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Arabadjiev

Advocate General

Saugmandsgaard Øe

Language(s) of the Case

• Finnish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French