Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 October 2019

Luonnonsuojeluyhdistys Tapiola Pohjois-Savo – Kainuu ry v Risto Mustonen and Others

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 12(1) — System of strict protection of animal species — Annex IV — Canis lupus (wolf) — Article 16(1)(e) — Derogation allowing the taking of certain specimens in limited numbers — Hunting for population management purposes — Evaluation of the conservation status of populations of the species concerned

Case C-674/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
29/11/2019 Luonnonsuojeluyhdistys Tapiola
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2019:851
10/10/2019 Luonnonsuojeluyhdistys Tapiola
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Abstract
ECLI:EU:C:2019:851
10/10/2019 Luonnonsuojeluyhdistys Tapiola
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2019:394
08/05/2019 Luonnonsuojeluyhdistys Tapiola
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
02/02/2018 Luonnonsuojeluyhdistys Tapiola
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.23 Environment, sustainable development and climate
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.23 Environment, sustainable development and climate
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.23 Environment, sustainable development and climate
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.23 Environment, sustainable development and climate
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.23 Environment, sustainable development and climate
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.01 Sources of EU law
    1.01.02 General principles of law
      1.01.02.11 Precautionary principle
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.23 Environment, sustainable development and climate
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.23 Environment, sustainable development and climate


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 01/12/2017

Date of the Opinion

  • 08/05/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

10/10/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 423 from 16.12.2019, p.2

Application: OJ C 63 from 19.02.2018, p.7

Name of the parties

Luonnonsuojeluyhdistys Tapiola

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Darpö, Jan: Anything Goes, but..., Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 2019 Vol.16 p.305-318 (EN)
  2. Kole, S.D.P.: Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2020 nº 1/2 p.3744-3745 (NL)
  3. Fleurke, Floor M. ; Trouwborst, Arie: Finse wolvenjacht: deur op een kier voor ‘ecodictie’ in het Europese natuurbeschermingsrecht?, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2020 p.35-42 (NL)
  4. Thieffry, Patrick: Cour de justice, 2e ch., 10 octobre 2019, Luonnonsuojeluyhdistys Tapiola Pohjois-Savo – Kainuu ry, aff. C-647/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:851, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2019. Décisions et commentaires 2019, p. 592-597 (FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Korkein hallinto-oikeus - Finland

Subject-matter

  • Environment

Provisions of national law referred to

Metsästyslaki (615/1993), 37 § 3 (159/2011), 41 § 1, 41a § 1 (159/2011), 41a § 3 (159/2011) Laki metsästyslain muuttamisesta (159/2011) Valtioneuvoston asetus metsästyslaissa säädetyistä poikkeusluvista (452/2013), 3 §, 4 § Maa- ja metsätalousministeriön asetus poikkeusluvalla sallittavasta suden metsästyksestä poronhoitoalueen ulkopuolella metsästysvuonna 2015—2016 (1488/2015), 1 §

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Arabadjiev

Advocate General

Saugmandsgaard Øe

Language(s) of the Case

  • Finnish

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • French