Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 89/665 : paragraphs 1, 25
• Directive 89/665 -A01 : paragraph 4
• Directive 89/665 -A01P1 : paragraph 28
• Directive 89/665 -A01P1L1 : paragraph 27
• Directive 89/665 -A01P1L2 : paragraph 27
• Directive 89/665 -A01P3 : paragraph 28
• Directive 89/665 -A02 : paragraph 5
• Directive 89/665 -A02P1 : paragraphs 29, 43
• Directive 89/665 -A02P6 : paragraphs 35, 36
• Directive 89/665 -A02QUATER : paragraphs 6, 32
• Directive 89/665 -A02QUINQUIES : paragraph 30
• Directive 89/665 -A02QUINQUIESP1 : paragraph 7
• Directive 89/665 -A02SEPTIES : paragraph 8
• Directive 89/665 -A02SEPTIESP1 : paragraph 30
• Directive 89/665 -A02SEPTIESP1LB : paragraph 34
• Directive 89/665 -A02SEPTIESP2 : paragraph 32
• Directive 2004/18 -A10 : paragraph 27
• Directive 2004/18 -A11 : paragraph 27
• Directive 2004/18 -A12 : paragraph 27
• Directive 2004/18 -A13 : paragraph 27
• Directive 2004/18 -A14 : paragraph 27
• Directive 2004/18 -A15 : paragraph 27
• Directive 2004/18 -A16 : paragraph 27
• Directive 2004/18 -A17 : paragraph 27
• Directive 2004/18 -A18 : paragraph 27
• Directive 2007/66 -C13 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2007/66 -C14 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2007/66 -C2 : paragraphs 3, 27
• Directive 2007/66 -C25 : paragraphs 3, 31, 40
• Directive 2007/66 -C27 : paragraphs 3, 31, 34, 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -406/08 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/13 -N39 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/14 -N43 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/14 -N46 : paragraph 37

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : point 35
  
• Directive 89/665 : points 3, 4, 19, 24 - 26, 33, 35, 44
  
• Directive 89/665 -A01P1L3 : points 5, 35, 49
  
• Directive 89/665 -A02 : point 6
  
• Directive 89/665 -A02P1 : point 25
  
• Directive 89/665 -A02P1LC : point 34
  
• Directive 89/665 -A02P6 : point 42
  
• Directive 89/665 -A02P7 : point 30
  
• Directive 89/665 -A02QUINQUIES : point 7
  
• Directive 89/665 -A02SEPTIES : points 8, 26 - 31, 39, 51
  
• Directive 89/665 -C6 : point 44
  
• Directive 92/13 : point 25
  
• Directive 2004/18 -A35P4 : point 43
  
• Directive 2007/66 : points 3, 4
  
• Directive 2007/66 -C13 : point 29
  
• Directive 2007/66 -C25 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -33/76 -N5 : points 32, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -312/93 -N12 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/96 -N19 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/99 -N71 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/99 -N72 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/99 -N76 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/99 -N78 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -327/00 -N52 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/03 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/05 -N28 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -454/06 : points 3, 30, 36, 39, 40, 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/06 -N50 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/06 -N51 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -406/08 : points 3, 30, 39, 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -406/08 -N26 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -406/08 -N27 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -406/08 -N32 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -246/09 -N36 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/13 -N37 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/13 -N45 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/13 -N46 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/13 -N40 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/13 -N51 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/13 -N52 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -570/13 -N37 : point 32
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 07/04/2014

Date of the Opinion

• 21/05/2015

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

26/11/2015

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 38 from 01.02.2016, p.4

Application: OJ C 282 from 25.08.2014, p.16

Name of the parties

MedEval

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Antloga, Alenka: Dopustnost vložitve odškodninskega zahtevka na področju prava javnih naročil, Pravna praksa 2015 nº 49-50 p.34 (SL)
2. Dero-Bugny, Delphine ; Perrin, Alix: Cour de justice, 5e ch., 26 novembre 2015, MedEval - Qualitäts-, Leistungs- und Struktur-Evaluierung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH., aff. C-166/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:779, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2015 (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2015 p.679-681 (FR)
3. McGowan, David: Impermissibility of Absolute Limitation Periods for Claiming Damages without Knowledge of the Breach: case C-166/14 MedEval, Public Procurement Law Review 2016 p.NA37-NA39 (EN)
4. Hiersche, Alexander ; Oder, Martin: EuGH kippt sechsmonatige Ausschlussfrist für Schadenersatz im BVergG, Zeitschrift für Vergaberecht und Beschaffungspraxis 2016 p.49-54 (DE)
5. Bouveresse, Aude: Effectivité des voies de recours, Europe 2016 Janvier Comm. nº 1 p.19-20 (FR)
6. Vorwalter, Sebastian: Unionsrechtswidrige Ausschlussfrist für Schadensersatz, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2016 p.142-143 (DE)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Verwaltungsgerichtshof - Austria

Subject-matter

• Freedom of establishment
  
• Freedom to provide services
  
• Approximation of laws
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Bundesgesetz über die Vergabe von Aufträgen (Bundesvergabegesetz – BVergG), Paragraphen 312 und 332

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

cinquième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Juhász

Advocate General

Kokott

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• German