Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 May 2018

Éva Nothartová v Sámson József Boldizsár

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tatabányai Törvényszék

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction — Special jurisdiction — Article 8(3) — Counterclaim arising or not arising from the same contract or facts on which the original claim was based

Case C-306/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
06/07/2018 Nothartová
area of freedom, security and justice
- Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2018:360		 31/05/2018 Nothartová
area of freedom, security and justice
- Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2018:360		 31/05/2018 Nothartová
area of freedom, security and justice
- Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Application (OJ)
28/07/2017 Nothartová
area of freedom, security and justice
- Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 26/05/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

31/05/2018


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 259 from 23.07.2018, p.12

Application: OJ C 269 from 14.08.2017, p.8

Name of the parties

Nothartová

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Idot, Laurence: Règlement " Bruxelles I Bis " - Compétence spéciale et demande reconventionnelle, Europe 2018 Juillet Comm. nº 7 p.40 (FR)
  2. Asser, W.D.H. ; De Boer, Th.M.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2018 Afl.32/33 p.4412 (NL)
  3. Wilke, Félix M.: Auf Umwegen zurück zum Wortlaut : Der EuGH zur Widerklage, Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union - GPR 2018 N°6 p.283-288 (DE, EN, FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Tatabányai Törvényszék - Hungary

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

huitième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Safjan

Advocate General

Saugmandsgaard Øe

Language(s) of the Case

  • Hungarian

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available