Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)
Subject-matter
Application for annulment of the decision of the European Medicines Agency of 31 January 2012, taken in the tendering procedure EMA/2011/17/ICT on the provision of external services for software applications, to place the applicants’ tender in second place in the cascading contract mechanism in respect of Lot 1, and for damages.
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
2.08.05 Judicial review
2.08.05.01 Extent of judicial review
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
2.08.03.07 Award of contract
2.08.03.07.01 Award criteria
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
2.08.03.05 Choice of participants
2.08.03.05.01 Selection criteria
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
2.08.03.07 Award of contract
2.08.03.07.01 Award criteria
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
2.08.03.07 Award of contract
2.08.03.07.02 Assessment procedures
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
2.08.01 Principles governing public procurement
2.08.01.01 Equal treatment and transparency
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
2.08.03.07 Award of contract
2.08.03.07.01 Award criteria
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Regulation 1605/2002
-A97 : paragraph 76
-
Regulation 1605/2002
-A97P1 : paragraph 36
-
Regulation 1605/2002
-A97P2 : paragraphs 19, 39
-
Regulation 2342/2002
-A136 : paragraph 38
-
Regulation 2342/2002
-A137 : paragraph A137
-
Regulation 2342/2002
-A138 : paragraph 42
-
Regulation 2342/2002
-A138P1 : paragraph 19
-
Regulation 2342/2002
-A138P2 : paragraphs 19, 39, 40, 61, 63
-
Regulation 2342/2002
-A138P3 : paragraphs 19, 61, 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -31/87
: paragraphs 37 - 40
-
General Court - Judgment T -169/00
: paragraph 56
-
General Court - Judgment T -148/04
: paragraph 56
-
General Court - Judgment T -50/05
: paragraphs 59, 60
-
General Court - Judgment T -70/05
: paragraphs 61 - 64, 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -532/06
: paragraphs 37 - 42
-
General Court - Judgment T -63/06
: paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/07
: paragraphs 37 - 42
-
General Court - Judgment T -39/08
: paragraphs 43, 52
-
General Court - Judgment T -49/09
: paragraph 18
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -252/10
: paragraphs 19 - 22
Operative part
Information not available
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
29/01/2014
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 184 from 23.06.2012, p.15
Judgment: OJ C 71 from 08.03.2014, p.18
Name of the parties
European Dynamics Belgium and Others v EMA
Notes on Academic Writings
Information not available
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- European Union public contracts
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
- Action for damages : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
deuxième chambre (Tribunal)
Judge-Rapporteur
Schwarcz
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available