Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2014

European Dynamics Belgium SA and Others v European Medicines Agency

Public service contracts — Community tender procedure — External service provision for software applications — Decision to classify the applicant’s tender in second place for the purposes of a cascading contract — Award criteria — Addition of award criterion not provided for by the contract documents — Assessment of a selection criterion at the award stage — Transparency

Case T‑158/12



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
21/02/2014 European Dynamics Belgium and Others v EMA
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2014:36
29/01/2014 European Dynamics Belgium and Others v EMA
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2014:36
29/01/2014 European Dynamics Belgium and Others v EMA
Application (OJ)
08/06/2012 European Dynamics Belgium and Others v EMA
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Application for annulment of the decision of the European Medicines Agency of 31 January 2012, taken in the tendering procedure EMA/2011/17/ICT on the provision of external services for software applications, to place the applicants’ tender in second place in the cascading contract mechanism in respect of Lot 1, and for damages.

Systematic classification scheme

1.
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.05 Judicial review
      2.08.05.01 Extent of judicial review
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
      2.08.03.07 Award of contract
        2.08.03.07.01 Award criteria
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
      2.08.03.05 Choice of participants
        2.08.03.05.01 Selection criteria
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
      2.08.03.07 Award of contract
        2.08.03.07.01 Award criteria
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
      2.08.03.07 Award of contract
        2.08.03.07.02 Assessment procedures
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.01 Principles governing public procurement
      2.08.01.01 Equal treatment and transparency
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
      2.08.03.07 Award of contract
        2.08.03.07.01 Award criteria


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 05/04/2012

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

29/01/2014


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 184 from 23.06.2012, p.15

Judgment: OJ C 71 from 08.03.2014, p.18

Name of the parties

European Dynamics Belgium and Others v EMA

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • European Union public contracts

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
  • Action for damages : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Schwarcz

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • Greek

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available