Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 288 : paragraph 55
• TEU, Article 4 : paragraphs 1, 23, 50, 52
• TEU, Article 4 -P3 : paragraph 51
• TEU, Article 19 : paragraphs 1, 23, 50
• TEU, Article 19 -P1 : paragraph 52
• Directive 2008/50 -A01 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2008/50 -A02 : paragraph 5
• Directive 2008/50 -A13 : paragraphs 1, 6, 23, 36, 44, 49
• Directive 2008/50 -A13P1L1 : paragraph 30
• Directive 2008/50 -A13P1L2 : paragraphs 25, 30, 42, 50, 56, 58
• Directive 2008/50 -A22 : paragraphs 1, 7, 23, 24, 44, 46, 47, 50, 56, 58
• Directive 2008/50 -A22P1 : paragraphs 11, 26 - 28, 31, 33 - 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 49, 53
• Directive 2008/50 -A22P4 : paragraphs 26, 28
• Directive 2008/50 -A23 : paragraphs 1, 8, 11, 26, 45, 46
• Directive 2008/50 -A23P1 : paragraph 48
• Directive 2008/50 -A23P1L2 : paragraphs 36, 37, 39, 49, 53, 56, 57
• Directive 2008/50 -A23P1L3 : paragraph 41
• Directive 2008/50 -A23P2 : paragraph 11
• Directive 2008/50 -A24 : paragraph 41
• Directive 2008/50 -A30 : paragraphs 1, 9, 23, 50, 51
• Directive 2008/50 -C16 : paragraphs 3, 32, 47
• Directive 2008/50 -N11 : paragraphs 23 - 25, 27, 33, 35, 36, 39, 43, 49
• Directive 2008/50 -N11PTB : paragraph 10
• Directive 2008/50 -N15PTA : paragraphs 11, 41, 45
• Directive 2008/50 -N15PTB : paragraphs 11, 26, 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/05 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/07 : paragraphs 53 - 56

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -A13
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -A13P1L2
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -A22
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -A22P1
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -A23P1
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -A30
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -N11

Opinion

Information not available

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 16/07/2013

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

19/11/2014

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 26 from 26.01.2015, p.6

Application: OJ C 274 from 21.09.2013, p.14

Name of the parties

ClientEarth

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Pucelj Vidović, Tanja: Iztožljivost vsebine načrta za kakovost zraka, Pravna praksa 2014 nº 48 p.23 (SL)
2. Thieffry, Patrick: Cour de justice, 2e ch., 19 novembre 2014, ClientEarth c/ Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, aff. C-404/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2382, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2014 (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2014 p.369-371 (FR)
3. Backes, Ch.: Luchtkwaliteitsplannen; Grenswaarden luchtkwaliteit betekenen resultaatsverplichting; verplichting derogatie aan te vragen; verplichting rechter om bestuur te bevelen luchtkwaliteitsplan op te stellen, Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2015 nº 268-269 (NL)
4. Ryall, Áine: Enforcing EU Environmental Law against Member States: Air Pollution, National Courts and the Rule of Law, European Journal of Risk Regulation 2015 Nº 2 p.305-308 (EN)
5. Barritt, Emily: Standing Up for British Lungs: Effective Judicial Enforcement in Environmental Law – R (on the application of ClientEarth) v. Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 2015 p.368-372 (EN)
6. Roset, Sébastien: Qualité de l'air et effet direct de la directive 2008/50/CE, Europe 2015 Janvier Comm. nº 1 p.33-34 (FR)
7. Thieffry, Patrick: X. Environnement - Cour de justice, 2e ch., 19 novembre 2014, ClientEarth c/ Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, aff. C‑404/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2382, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2014. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2015, p. 369-371 (FR)
8. Van der Hulle, R. ; Van Heijningen, L.: Het wetgevingsbevel vanuit Unie-rechtelijk perspectief: het debat heropend, S.E.W. ; Sociaal-economische wetgeving 2016 p.11-18 (NL)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom - United Kingdom

Subject-matter

• Environment
  
• - Pollution
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Bonichot

Advocate General

Jääskinen

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available