Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 May 2021

Bavaria Weed GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office

EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark BavariaWeed – Absolute ground for refusal – Trade mark contrary to public policy – Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001

Case T-178/20


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Link
Application (OJ)
15/05/2020 Bavaria Weed v EUIPO (BavariaWeed)
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2021:259
12/05/2021 Bavaria Weed v EUIPO (BavariaWeed)
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2021:259
12/05/2021 Bavaria Weed v EUIPO (BavariaWeed)
Judgment (OJ)
11/06/2021 Bavaria Weed v EUIPO (BavariaWeed)
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

Not yet published (General Report - Section 'Information on unpublished decisions')

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.06 Marks contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.06 Marks contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.06 Marks contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.13 Signs examined
          4.11.03.01.13.06 Marks contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality
            4.11.03.01.13.06.02 Figurative marks
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.06 Marks contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.04 Procedure and legal proceedings
        4.11.03.04.03 Appeals
          4.11.03.04.03.02 Actions before the Courts of the European Union
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.00 General
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.00 General


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 06/04/2020

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

12/05/2021


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Bavaria Weed v EUIPO (BavariaWeed)

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Basire, Yann: RMUE 2017/1001, art. 7, §1 sous f) et §2 – Contrariété à l’ordre public – Marque figurative, Propriétés intellectuelles 2022, n° 82, p. 88-90 (FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

dixième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Kornezov

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available