Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 10 : paragraph 33
• TFEU, Article 19 : paragraphs 33, 34
• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 45
• TEU, Article 6 : paragraph 30
• Directive 2000/78 : paragraphs 1, 30, 35 - 37, 42, 46, 53, 56, 58, 59, 64
• Directive 2000/78 -A01 : paragraphs 4, 36, 50, 57
• Directive 2000/78 -A02P1 : paragraph 5
• Directive 2000/78 -A02P2 : paragraph 5
• Directive 2000/78 -A02P2LA : paragraph 51
• Directive 2000/78 -A03P1LC : paragraphs 6, 52
• Directive 2000/78 -A05 : paragraphs 7, 57
• Directive 2000/78 -A08P1 : paragraph 8
• Directive 2000/78 -A10P1 : paragraphs 9, 63
• Directive 2000/78 -A10P2 : paragraphs 9, 63
• Directive 2000/78 -C1 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2000/78 -C11 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2000/78 -C12 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2000/78 -C15 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2000/78 -C16 : paragraph 57
• Directive 2000/78 -C28 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2000/78 -C31 : paragraph 3
• Decision 2010/48 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -13/05 : paragraphs 32, 34, 36, 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 : paragraphs 39, 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -335/11 : paragraphs 53, 55, 57, 59
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/12 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -363/12 : paragraphs 53, 54

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2000/78

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21 : points 16 - 18, 23, 26
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21 -P1 : points 24, 26
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : points 20, 23, 24
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P2 : point 19
  
• TFEU, Article 10 : points 16, 23
  
• TFEU, Article 19 : points 16, 23
  
• TEU, Article 6 : point 11
  
• TEU, Article 6 -P1 : point 19
  
• Directive 97/80 -C18 : point 11
  
• Directive 2000/43 : point 24
  
• Directive 2000/78 : points 11, 14, 15, 24, 28 - 41, 46, 47, 53, 54, 56, 58, 61
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A01 : points 4, 31, 37, 39, 57, 58, 60
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A02 : points 4, 39
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A03 : point 5
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A03P1LC : point 5
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A05 : points 30, 40, 59
  
• Directive 2000/78 -C17 : point 40
  
• Directive 2006/54 : point 24
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007) - Explanations -A21 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -299/95 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -309/96 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -144/04 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -13/05 : points 32, 34, 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -13/05 : points 3, 23, 25, 29, 31, 32, 40, 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/06 : points 3, 27, 29, 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -555/07 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 : points 19, 20, 22
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -335/11 : points 32, 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/11 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/11 : point 3
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -312/11 : points 3, 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -335/11 : points 3, 29, 30, 32, 33, 46, 57, 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/11 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -356/12 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -363/12 : points 23, 41, 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/12 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/12 : points 3, 18, 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -363/12 : points 3, 29, 30, 33 - 35, 42, 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -498/12 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -499/12 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/13 : points 21, 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -265/13 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -258/13 : point 22
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 27/06/2013

Date of the Opinion

• 17/07/2014

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

18/12/2014

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 65 from 23.02.2015, p.7

Application: OJ C 252 from 31.08.2013, p.22

Name of the parties

FOA

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Stiebert, Tom: Diskriminierungsschutz XXL - Super Size Me?, Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht 2014 n° 5 p.III (DE)
2. Stiebert, Tom ; Schmidt, Maximilian: Diskriminierungsschutz für Dicke?, Zeitschrift für europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 2014 p.128-131 (DE)
3. Benkert, Daniel: Dick im Geschäft – Diskriminierung überall, Neue juristische Wochenschrift 2014 n° 33 p.3 (DE)
4. Robin-Olivier, Sophie: Cour de justice, 4e ch., 18 décembre 2014, FOA, aff. C-354/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2463, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2014 (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2014 p.272-278 (FR)
5. Lindemann, Lena: Diskriminierung im Arbeitsverhältnis - Adipositas als bedingter Behinderungsgrund, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft 2015 p.155-156 (DE)
6. Smith, Ian: Employment law brief. Ian Smith addresses discrimination & considers a cautionary tale for employees, New Law Journal 2015 p.8-9 (EN)
7. Forst, Gerrit: Adipositas eines Beschäftigten als Behinderung, Europäische Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht 2015 p.241-251 (DE)
8. Chlestil, Martina: Adipositas des Arbeitnehmers – Vorliegen einer „Behinderung“ iSd RL 2000/78/EG, Das Recht der Arbeit 2015 p.81-82 (DE)
9. Lingscheid, Anja: Starkes Übergewicht (Adipositas) als Behinderung und Diskriminierungsschutz, Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht 2015 p.147-150 (DE)
10. Pötters, Stephan: Arbeitsrecht: Adipositas eines Arbeitnehmers als Behinderung, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2015 p.147-148 (DE)
11. Ó Cathaoir, Katharina: On Obesity as a Disability, European Journal of Risk Regulation 2015 Nº 1 p.145-150 (EN)
12. Gavalas, Nikolaos: To D.E.E. entassei tin chronia pachysarkia stin ennoia tis anapirias, Epitheorisis Ergatikou Dikaiou 2015 p.432-434 (EL)
13. Šokčević, Snježana: ZAŠTITA ZDRAVLJA, SIGURNOSTI I DOSTOJANSTVA PRETILIH RADNIKA KAO OSOBA S INVALIDITETOM, Radno pravo 2015 n° 11 p.50-62 (HR)
14. Drobež, Eneja: Delovnopravno varstvo ljudi s čezmerno telesno težo, Odvetnik : revija odvetniške zbornice Slovenije 2015 n° 1 (69) p.38-40 (SL)
15. Salinas Alcega, Sergio: Obesidad y no discriminación en el empleo. La obesidad como causa de discriminación en el empleo, de manera directa o integrada en el concepto de discapacidad, Revista Aranzadi Unión Europea 2015 nº2 p. 47-50 (ES)
16. Skubic, Zoran: Debelost se po delovnem pravu EU lahko šteje kot invalidnost, Pravna praksa 2015 nº 2 p.28-29 (SL)
17. Hlava, Daniel: Adipositas kann Behinderung sein, Arbeit und Recht 2015 p.329-331 (DE)
18. Hájíčková, Kamila: Z judikatury Soudního dvora EU, Obezita může představovat „zdravotní postižení“ ve smyslu směrnice o rovném zacházení v zaměstnání., Bulletin advokacie 2015 nº 5 p.52-53 (CS)
19. Dumitrașcu, Augustina: Curtea de Justiție a Uniunii Europene, Curierul Judiciar 2015 p.109-110 (RO)
20. Damamme, Joseph: Arrêt Kaltoft : l’obésité comme handicap. Raisons, modalités et conséquences d’une association retentissante, Revue européenne de droit de la consommation 2015 p.217-229 (FR)
21. Maliszewska-Nienartowicz, Justyna: Dyskryminacja pracownika ze względu na otyłość stanowiącą niepełnosprawność - glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z 18.12.2014 r. w sprawie C-354/13 Fag og Arbejde (FOA) przeciwko Kommunernes Landsforening, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2015 Vol. 11 p.44-50 (PL)
22. Cavallini, Joël: Obésité et principe de non-discrimination, La Semaine Juridique - Social 2015 nº 9 p.32-34 (FR)
23. Driguez, Laetitia: L'obésité comme handicap et motif discriminatoire, Europe 2015 Février Comm. nº 2 p.40-41 (FR)
24. Mair, Andreas: Zeitschrift für europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 2015 p.342-344 (DE)
25. Mikola, Orsolya: Az Európai Bíróság döntése a fogyatékosság fogalmával kapcsolatban, Jogesetek Magyarázata 2015 nº 2 p.73-78 (HU)
26. Kozak, Wolfgang: Adipositas ist nicht das Ende!, Das Recht der Arbeit 2015 p.319-321 (DE)
27. Pelayo Olmedo, José Daniel: Aclaraciones del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea sobre el principio de discriminación: la obesidad como posible causa de discapacidad. A propósito de sentencia Karsten Kaltoft vs. Billund Kommune, Revista General de Derecho Europeo 2015, n° 37, p. 1-18 (ES)
28. de Beco, Gauthier: IS OBESITY A DISABILITY? THE DEFINITION OF DISABILITY BY THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR THE APPLICATION OF EU ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW, The Columbia Journal of European Law 2016 p.381-402 (EN)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Retten i Kolding - Denmark

Subject-matter

• Principles, objectives and tasks of the Treaties
  
• Social policy
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Lov om forbud mod forskelsbehandling på arbejdsmarkedet m.v. (forskelsbehandlingsloven), jfr. lovbekendtgørelse nr. 1349 af 16 december 2008, §§ 1, 2, stk. 1, 2a, 7 og 7a

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

quatrième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Safjan

Advocate General

Jääskinen

Language(s) of the Case

• Danish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English