Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 29
• Regulation 510/2006 : paragraph 11
• Regulation 510/2006 -A01P1L2 : paragraph 31
• Regulation 510/2006 -A13 : paragraph 30
• Regulation 510/2006 -A13P1LB : paragraph 24
• Regulation 1234/2007 : paragraphs 27, 33
• Regulation 1234/2007 -A118QUATERDECIESP2 : paragraph 34
• Regulation 1234/2007 -A230 : paragraph 8
• Regulation 1234/2007 -A232 : paragraph 9
• Regulation 1151/2012 : paragraphs 11, 32
• Regulation 1151/2012 -A02P2 : paragraphs 13, 31
• Regulation 1151/2012 -A13P1LB : paragraph 14
• Regulation 1151/2012 -C32 : paragraphs 12, 47
• Regulation 1308/2013 : paragraphs 32, 33, 48, 49, 61
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A92 : paragraphs 4, 46
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A92P1 : paragraph 10
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A93P1 : paragraph 5
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A93P1LA : paragraph 46
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103 : paragraphs 1, 6, 30
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2 : paragraphs 34, 50
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LA : paragraphs 36, 38, 39 - 41, 54
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LAPT2 : paragraphs 35, 37
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LB : paragraphs 14, 24, 35, 36, 39, 40, 42, 43, 45, 47, 51 - 54, 60, 64 - 70
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A107P1 : paragraph 7
• Regulation 1308/2013 -C97 : paragraphs 3, 47
• Regulation 1308/2013 -N7PART2PT5 : paragraph 10
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -478/07 -N114 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -478/07 -N129 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/16 -N100 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/16 -N101 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/16 -N102 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/16 -N103 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -393/16 -N32 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -393/16 -N38 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N33 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N44 : paragraph 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N45 : paragraph 59
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N46 : paragraph 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N47 : paragraph 62
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N48 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N49 : paragraph 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N50 : paragraph 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N51 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N53 : paragraph 59
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -614/17 -N25 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -614/17 -N27 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -614/17 -N47 : paragraph 63
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -614/17 -N48 : paragraph 64
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -783/19 : paragraphs 38, 50, 54, 69
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -181/19 -N61 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -287/19 -N59 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -490/19 -N24 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -490/19 -N25 : paragraphs 36, 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -490/19 -N26 : paragraph 58

Operative part

• Interprets : Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LB

Opinion

• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A23 : points 13, 24
  
• TFEU, Article 39 : point 39
  
• TFEU, Article 40 : point 39
  
• TFEU, Article 41 : point 39
  
• TFEU, Article 42 : point 39
  
• TFEU, Article 43 : point 39
  
• TFEU, Article 44 : point 39
  
• Regulation 1576/89 : point 24
  
• Regulation 2081/92 -A14P1 : point 44
  
• Regulation 510/2006 : point 54
  
• Regulation 510/2006 -A01P1L2 : point 17
  
• Regulation 510/2006 -A13 : points 11, 17
  
• Regulation 1234/2007 : points 16, 19, 25, 35
  
• Regulation 1234/2007 -A118QUATORDECIES : point 19
  
• Regulation 110/2008 -A16LA : points 24, 25
  
• Regulation 110/2008 -A16LB : point 50
  
• Regulation 491/2009 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A61P1 : point 13
  
• Regulation 1151/2012 -A02P2 : point 17
  
• Regulation 1151/2012 -A13 : point 17
  
• Regulation 1151/2012 -A13P1 : point 30
  
• Regulation 1151/2012 -A13P1LA : point 30
  
• Regulation 1151/2012 -A13P1LB : point 30
  
• Regulation 1151/2012 -A14P1 : point 44
  
• Regulation 1151/2012 -C32 : point 39
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 : points 35, 42, 46
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A92P1 : point 3
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A92P2 : point 3
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A93P1LA : points 4, 7, 32
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103 : points 1, 17, 23
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2 : points 5, 19, 21, 30, 36, 51, 58, 69, 71, 72
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LA : points 23, 24, 27
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LAL1 : point 44
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LAL2 : points 41, 42, 44
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LAPT1 : point 44
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LAPT2 : points 24, 25, 30
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LB : points 11, 19, 22, 26, 29, 32, 33, 37, 38, 40, 41, 43, 45, 55, 60, 62, 70, 75, 76
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LC : point 23
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A103P2LD : point 23
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A104 : point 7
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A104SNT1 : point 6
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -A107P1 : point 7
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -C92 : point 39
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -C97SNT1 : points 36, 38
  
• Regulation 1308/2013 -C97SNT2 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -87/97 -N33 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -87/97 -N35 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/97 -N23 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/97 : points 45, 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/97 -N25 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/97 -N27 : points 54, 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/97 -N28 : point 54
  
• General Court - Judgment T -53/04 -N175 : point 42
  
• General Court - Judgment T -60/04 -N164 : point 44
  
• General Court - Judgment T -60/04 -N165 : point 44
  
• General Court - Judgment T -60/04 -N166 : point 44
  
• General Court - Judgment T -60/04 -N167 : point 44
  
• General Court - Judgment T -60/04 -N168 : point 44
  
• General Court - Judgment T -60/04 -N169 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/05 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/05 -N46 : points 54, 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/05 -N47 : points 54, 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/05 -N48 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -478/07 -N107 : point 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/10 -N55 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/10 -N57 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/15 : points 45, 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/15 -N22 : points 59, 62
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/15 -N23 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/15 -N24 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/15 -N25 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/15 -N26 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/15 -N27 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/15 -N31 : points 62, 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/15 -N33 : points 53, 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/15 -N35 : points 53, 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/15 -N37 : points 54, 56
  
• General Court - Judgment T -510/15 -N44 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/16 -N82 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/16 -N96 : point 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/16 -N99 : points 16, 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/16 -N100 : points 16, 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/16 -N101 : point 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/16 -N102 : points 16, 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/16 -N103 : point 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -393/16 -N32 : point 18
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -614/17 -N17 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -614/17 -N19 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -614/17 -N29 : points 54, 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N29 : points 24, 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N30 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N31 : points 24, 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N32 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N33 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N46 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N49 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N50 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N51 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N53 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -614/17 -N20 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -614/17 -N21 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -614/17 -N27 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -614/17 -N47 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -614/17 -N48 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -490/19 -N29 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -490/19 -N45 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -490/19 -N24 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -490/19 -N25 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -490/19 -N26 : points 51, 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -490/19 -N27 : point 51
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 22/10/2019

Date of the Opinion

• 29/04/2021

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

09/09/2021

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Rigaux, Anne: Circulation des marchandises - Appellations d'origine protégées, Europe 2021, nº 11 Novembre, comm. 376 (FR)
2. Vrins, Olivier: No champagne for ‘Champanillo’: the protection of PDOs and PGIs against evocation for services : C-783/19, Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v GB, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 2021 p. 1171-1174 (EN)
3. Cayron, Jocelyne: Une appellation d’origine est protégée contre son évocation par un prestataire de services : (CJUE, 9 septembre 2021, C-783/19), Jus vini 2021 No. 2 p. 231/241 (FR)
4. Aznar Company, Miquel: Comentario a la Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Quinta) de 9 de septiembre de 2021, Asunto C-783/19 Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne contra GB, Revista de Derecho de la Competencia y la Distribución 2021, nº 30, p. 1-11 (ES)
5. Martin, Stefan ; Bourdeau, Leonie: No free lunch for "Champanillo" : the Court of Justice confirms that the protection of the PDO "Champagne" extends to bar and restaurant services : Comite Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v GB (C-783/19), European Intellectual Property Review 2022 p. 48-51 (EN)
6. Le Goffic, Caroline: Appellation d’origine protégée (AOP) – Évocation – Produits ou services – Concurrence déloyale, Propriétés intellectuelles 2022, n° 82, p. 105-108 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona - Spain

Subject-matter

• Agriculture and Fisheries
  
• Consumer protection
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

cinquième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Juhász

Advocate General

Pitruzzella

Language(s) of the Case

• Spanish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• Italian