Reports of Cases
2007 II-00153*
Pub somm
Subject-matter
Action for annulment brought by the applicant for figurative trade mark ‘Castell del Remei ODA’ for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 33 against Decision R 263/2005-1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 17 January 2006 dismissing the appeal brought against the decision of the Opposition Division refusing registration of that mark in opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of national word marks ‘RODA’, ‘RODA I’, ‘RODA II’ and ‘BODEGAS RODA’ and of international word mark ‘RODA’ for goods in Class 33
Systematic classification scheme
|
1.
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-33 Community trade mark
B-33.02 Relative grounds for refusal
B-33.02.07 Signs examined
B-33.02.07.02 Likelihood of confusion with an earlier mark
B-33.02.07.02.02 Figurative marks applied for |
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
Operative part
Information not available
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
14/11/2007
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 121 from 20.05.2006, p.16
Judgment: OJ C 315 from 22.12.2007, p.38
Name of the parties
Castell del Remei v OHMI - Bodegas Roda (CASTELL DEL REMEI ODA)
Notes on Academic Writings
Information not available
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- - Trade marks
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
quatrième chambre (Tribunal)
Judge-Rapporteur
Wiszniewska-Białecka
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available