CURIA - Case information

Home > Search form > List of results > Case information

Start printing

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2021

The Software Incubator Ltd v Computer Associates (UK) Ltd

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Self-employed commercial agents – Directive 86/653/EC – Article 1(2) – Definition of ‘commercial agent’ – Supply of computer software to customers by electronic means – Grant of a perpetual licence for use – Concepts of ‘sale’ and ‘goods’

Case C-410/19

Documents in the Case

Document

Date

Name of the parties

Subject-matter

Curia

EUR-Lex

Autres Liens

Judgment (OJ)

29/10/2021

The Software Incubator

Freedom of establishment

Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2021:742

16/09/2021

The Software Incubator

Freedom of establishment

Application (OJ)

12/07/2019

The Software Incubator

Freedom of establishment

Request for a preliminary ruling

27/05/2019

The Software Incubator

Freedom of establishment

Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2020:1061

17/12/2020

The Software Incubator

Freedom of establishment

Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.04 Free movement of persons and services
    4.04.02 Freedom of establishment
      4.04.02.01 The various activities

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

12020W/TXT : paragraph 3
12020W/TXT -A86P2 : paragraphs 4, 25
12020W/TXT -A86P3 : paragraph 4
12020W/TXT -A126 : paragraph 5
Directive 86/653 : paragraphs 12, 29, 37
Directive 86/653 -A01 : paragraph 7
Directive 86/653 -A01P2 : paragraphs 1, 19, 21, 23, 24, 26 - 28, 32, 33, 39, 43, 44, 46, 49, 51
Directive 86/653 -A01P3 : paragraph 45
Directive 86/653 -A02 : paragraph 45
Directive 86/653 -A02P1 : paragraph 8
Directive 86/653 -A03 : paragraphs 9, 47
Directive 86/653 -A04 : paragraph 47
Directive 86/653 -A04P2 : paragraph 10
Directive 86/653 -A05 : paragraph 47
Directive 86/653 -A06 : paragraph 47
Directive 86/653 -A06P1 : paragraph 11
Directive 86/653 -C2 : paragraphs 6, 48
Directive 86/653 -C3 : paragraphs 6, 48
Decision 2020/135 : paragraph 3
Court of Justice - Judgment C -65/05 -N23 : paragraph 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N42 : paragraph 40
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N44 : paragraph 41
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N45 : paragraph 42
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N46 : paragraph 42
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N61 : paragraph 38
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/17 -N23 : paragraph 28
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/17 -N26 : paragraph 48
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/17 -N40 : paragraph 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -828/18 -N26 : paragraph 31
Court of Justice - Opinion C -410/19 : paragraphs 37, 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/19 -N27 : paragraph 30

Operative part

Interprets : Directive 86/653 -A01P2

Opinion

12020W/TXT -A86P2 : point 22
12020W/TXT -A86P3 : point 22
12020W/TXT -A89P1 : point 22
12020W/TXT -A126 : point 22
Directive 85/374 -A02 : point 39
Directive 86/653 : points 34, 36, 37, 58, 62, 63, 68, 72, 73
Directive 86/653 -A01P2 : points 1 - 5, 14, 19, 20, 24, 27 - 33, 38, 40 - 42, 44, 45, 50 - 57, 64, 67, 70, 74 - 79, 82 - 85, 87 - 90
Directive 86/653 -A01P3 : points 44, 67
Directive 86/653 -A02 : point 76
Directive 86/653 -A02P1 : points 44, 67
Directive 86/653 -A03 : points 64, 86
Directive 86/653 -A04 : points 64, 86
Directive 86/653 -A04P2LA : points 55, 65
Directive 86/653 -A06P1 : points 55, 65
Directive 86/653 -A17 : points 14, 64, 86
Directive 86/653 -A20P2LB : points 55, 65
Directive 86/653 -C1 : point 26
Directive 86/653 -C2 : points 30, 43
Directive 86/653 -C3 : points 43, 76
Directive 2009/24 -A04P2 : points 46 - 48
Directive 2009/24 -A05P1 : point 46
Directive 2011/83 : points 25, 29, 30, 37
Directive 2011/83 -A01 : point 70
Directive 2011/83 -A02P3 : point 70
Directive 2011/83 -A05P2 : point 70
Directive 2011/83 -A06P2 : point 70
Directive 2011/83 -A09P2LC : point 70
Directive 2011/83 -A14P4LB : point 70
Directive 2011/83 -A16LM : point 70
Directive 2011/83 -A17P1 : point 70
Directive 2011/83 -C19 : point 70
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A62P1 : point 21
Directive 2019/770 : points 29, 30, 37, 70, 72
Directive 2019/770 -A01 : point 71
Directive 2019/770 -A02P3 : point 71
Directive 2019/770 -A03P1 : point 71
Directive 2019/770 -A03P3 : point 71
Directive 2019/770 -A03P4 : point 71
Directive 2019/770 -A24 : point 25
Directive 2019/770 -C12 : point 71
Directive 2019/770 -C19 : point 71
Directive 2019/770 -C20 : point 71
Directive 2019/770 -C21 : point 71
Directive 2019/770 -C22 : point 71
Directive 2019/771 : points 30, 70, 72
Directive 2019/771 -A01 : point 71
Directive 2019/771 -A02P5 : point 71
Directive 2019/771 -A03P3 : point 71
Directive 2019/771 -A03P4 : point 71
Directive 2019/771 -A24 : point 29
Directive 2019/771 -C12 : point 71
Directive 2019/771 -C13 : point 71
Directive 2019/771 -C14 : point 71
Directive 2019/771 -C15 : point 71
Directive 2019/771 -C16 : point 71
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 : points 60, 61
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 -A02 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 -A07P1 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 -A07P2 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 -A08P1 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 -A09P2 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 -A10P2LA : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 -A11P2 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 -A21P1 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 -A29P2 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 -A32P2 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51976PC0670 -C3 : point 76
Economic and Social Committee - Opinion 51977AC1159 -PT2.3.1 : point 58
Economic and Social Committee - Opinion 51977AC1159 -PT2.8.7 : point 58
Economic and Social Committee - Opinion 51977AC1159 -PT2.8.8 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51978PC0773 : point 59
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51978PC0773 -A02 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51978PC0773 -A29 : point 58
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51978PC0773 -C3 : point 76
Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 52017DC0259 -PT5 : point 70
Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 52020DC0064 : point 39
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/68 : points 25, 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -155/73 : point 29
Court of Justice - Judgment C -155/73 -N6 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -1/77 -N4 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -79/89 : point 29
Court of Justice - Judgment C -79/89 -N21 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/95 -N26 : point 64
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/98 : points 25, 29
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/98 -N30 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/98 -N31 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/98 -N32 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/98 -N33 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/98 -N34 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/98 -N35 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/98 -N36 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/98 -N37 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/98 -N38 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/98 -N39 : point 69
Court of Justice - Order C -85/03 : points 27, 29
Court of Justice - Order C -85/03 -N15 : point 56
Court of Justice - Order C -85/03 -N16 : point 56
Court of Justice - Order C -85/03 -N17 : point 56
Court of Justice - Order C -85/03 -N18 : point 56
Court of Justice - Order C -85/03 -N19 : point 56
Court of Justice - Order C -85/03 -N20 : point 56
Court of Justice - Order C -85/03 -N21 : point 56
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 : point 29
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N28 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N29 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N30 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N31 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N32 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N33 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N34 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N35 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N36 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N37 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N38 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N39 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N40 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N41 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N42 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N43 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N44 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N45 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N46 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N47 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N48 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N49 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N50 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N51 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N52 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N53 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N54 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N55 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N56 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N57 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N58 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N59 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -41/04 -N60 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -306/04 -N50 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -306/04 -N51 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -306/04 -N52 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -306/04 -N53 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -306/04 -N54 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -306/04 -N55 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -306/04 -N56 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -306/04 -N57 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -306/04 -N58 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/04 -N7 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/04 -N11 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/04 -N12 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/04 -N13 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/04 -N14 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/04 -N15 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/04 -N16 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/04 -N17 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/04 -N18 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/04 -N19 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N17 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N18 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N19 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N20 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N21 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N22 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N23 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N24 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N25 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N26 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N27 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N28 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N29 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04 -N30 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -306/04 -N30 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -306/04 -N31 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -306/04 -N37 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/04 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -65/05 : point 25
Court of Justice - Judgment C -65/05 -N23 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -65/05 -N24 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/09 -N23 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/09 -N24 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/09 -N25 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/09 -N26 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/09 -N27 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/09 -N28 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 : points 27, 31, 36, 37, 41
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N20 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N21 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N22 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N23 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N24 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N25 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N26 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N27 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N28 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N29 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N30 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N31 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N32 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N33 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N34 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N35 : point 46
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N40 : point 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N42 : point 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N44 : point 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N45 : point 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N46 : point 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N47 : point 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N48 : point 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N49 : point 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N55 : point 48
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N59 : point 48
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/11 -N61 : point 48
Court of Justice - Judgment C -219/11 : point 25
Court of Justice - Judgment C -219/11 -N16 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -219/11 -N17 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -219/11 -N18 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -219/11 -N19 : point 68
Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/12 -N48 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/12 -N30 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/12 -N31 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/12 -N23 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -479/13 -N35 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -502/13 : point 29
Court of Justice - Judgment C -502/13 -N42 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/14 -N16 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/14 -N17 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/14 -N18 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/14 -N19 : point 45
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N69 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N70 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N71 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N72 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N73 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N74 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N75 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N76 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N77 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N78 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N79 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -166/15 -N80 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N24 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N25 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N26 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N27 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N28 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N29 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N30 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N31 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N32 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N33 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N34 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N35 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N36 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N37 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N38 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N39 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -174/15 -N40 : point 77
Court of Justice - Judgment C -166/15 -N28 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -166/15 -N30 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -166/15 -N35 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -166/15 -N36 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -166/15 -N49 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -166/15 -N50 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -166/15 -N53 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -166/15 -N54 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -166/15 -N55 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N43 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N44 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N45 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N46 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N47 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N48 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N49 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N50 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N51 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N52 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N53 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N54 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N55 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N56 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N57 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N58 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N59 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N60 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N61 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N62 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N63 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N64 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N65 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N66 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N67 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N68 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N69 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N70 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N71 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/15 -N72 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/16 -N26 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/16 -N27 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/16 -N28 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/16 -N29 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/16 -N30 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/16 -N31 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/16 -N32 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/16 -N67 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -645/16 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -645/16 -N34 : point 43
Court of Justice - Opinion C -305/17 -N19 : point 69
Court of Justice - Opinion C -305/17 -N20 : point 69
Court of Justice - Opinion C -305/17 -N21 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -305/17 -N34 : point 69
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/17 -N23 : point 44
Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N48 : point 53
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N52 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N53 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N54 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N55 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N56 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N57 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N58 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N59 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N60 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N61 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N62 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N63 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N64 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N65 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N66 : point 49
Court of Justice - Opinion C -263/18 -N67 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/18 : points 31, 36
Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/18 -N53 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/18 -N54 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/18 -N55 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/18 -N56 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/18 -N57 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/18 -N58 : point 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -371/18 -N30 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -371/18 -N47 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -371/18 -N54 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -828/18 -N25 : point 53
Court of Justice - Judgment C -828/18 -N33 : point 64
Court of Justice - Judgment C -828/18 -N36 : point 43
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N69 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N70 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N71 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N72 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N73 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N74 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N75 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N76 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N77 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N78 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N79 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N80 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N81 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N82 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N83 : point 77
Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/19 -N84 : point 77
Court of Justice - Judgment C -265/19 -N46 : point 53
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N12 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N13 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N14 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N15 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N16 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N17 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N18 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N19 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N20 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N21 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N22 : point 68
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/19 -N23 : point 68

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

27/05/2019

Date of the Opinion

17/12/2020

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

16/09/2021

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

The Software Incubator

Notes on Academic Writings

: Software, die ohne Datenträger vertrieben wird, kann einen Verkauf einer Ware im Sinne der Handelsvertreterrichtlinie darstellen : EuGH v. 17.12.2020 : C-410/19 : Analyse, Internationales Handelsrecht 2021 p. 63-70 (DE)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom - United Kingdom

Subject-matter

Freedom of establishment

Provisions of national law referred to

Lohn- und Sozialdumping Bekämpfungsgesetz 13/06/2016, Paragraphen 26, 27, 28

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

quatrième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Jürimäe

Advocate General

Tanchev

Language(s) of the Case

English

Language(s) of the Opinion

English