Reports of Cases

2006 I-00086*

Pub somm

Subject-matter

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 25 May 2005 in Case T-352/02 Creative Technology Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) dismissing as unfounded an action brought by the applicant for the Community trade mark PC WORKS for products in Class 9 for the annulment of decision R 265/2001-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 4 September 2002 dismissing the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division refusing to register that trade mark in opposition proceedings brought by the holder of the national figurative mark W WORK PRO for products in Class 9

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 225 -P1 : paragraph 35
• Treaty of Nice 2001 - Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice -A58L1 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A119 : paragraph 30
• Regulation 40/94 -A08P1LB : paragraphs 31 - 39
• Regulation 40/94 -A63P3 : paragraph 40
• Regulation 40/94 -A63P6 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/00 : paragraph 35
• General Court - Judgment T -352/02 : paragraphs 1 - 44
• Court of Justice - Order C -3/03 : paragraphs 32, 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/04 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Order C -324/05 : paragraphs 32, 33

Operative part

• Confirms : General Court - Judgment T -352/02

Opinion

Information not available

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 03/08/2005

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

29/06/2006

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 296 from 26.11.2005, p.12

Order: OJ C 294 from 02.12.2006, p.20

Name of the parties

Creative Technology v OHIM

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  
• - Trade marks
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Actions for annulment
  
• Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
  
• Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  

Formation of the Court

cinquième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Klučka

Advocate General

Stix-Hackl

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available