Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 226 : paragraph 50
• TFEU, Article 258 : paragraph 50
• TFEU, Article 260 : paragraphs 1, 45, 113
• TFEU, Article 260 -P1 : paragraphs 97, 123
• TFEU, Article 260 -P2 : paragraphs 64, 84
• TEU, Article 4 -P3 : paragraph 75
• Directive 85/337 : paragraphs 18, 23, 24, 29, 37, 48, 59, 62, 66, 69, 71, 74, 76, 78, 80, 93, 101, 102, 109, 116, 121, 128
• Directive 85/337 -A02 : paragraphs 18, 64
• Directive 85/337 -A02P1 : paragraphs 2, 12, 72, 78, 79
• Directive 85/337 -A02P2 : paragraphs 2, 12
• Directive 85/337 -A02P3L1 : paragraphs 2, 12
• Directive 85/337 -A03 : paragraphs 3, 13
• Directive 85/337 -A04 : paragraphs 4, 14, 18, 64, 72
• Directive 85/337 -A04P1 : paragraph 78
• Directive 85/337 -A04P2 : paragraphs 11, 16, 78
• Directive 85/337 -A04P3 : paragraph 17
• Directive 85/337 -A05 : paragraphs 5, 18, 22, 64
• Directive 85/337 -A06 : paragraphs 6, 18, 22, 64
• Directive 85/337 -A07 : paragraphs 7, 18, 22, 64
• Directive 85/337 -A08 : paragraphs 8, 18, 22, 64
• Directive 85/337 -A09 : paragraphs 9, 18, 22, 64
• Directive 85/337 -A10 : paragraphs 10, 18, 22, 64
• Directive 85/337 -N1 : paragraphs 16, 72
• Directive 85/337 -N2 : paragraphs 11, 16, 72
• Directive 85/337 -N2PT2LA : paragraph 11
• Directive 85/337 -N2PT2LC : paragraph 11
• Directive 85/337 -N2PT3LI : paragraph 15
• Directive 85/337 -N2PT13 : paragraph 16
• Directive 85/337 -N3 : paragraph 17
• Directive 97/11 : paragraph 18
• Commission - Other Acts - 52017XC1215(01) : paragraph 100
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/02 : paragraph 54
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/02 -N42 : paragraph 72
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/02 -N64 : paragraphs 38, 75
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/02 -N65 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/03 -N67 : paragraph 92
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/03 -N68 : paragraph 92
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/03 -N69 : paragraph 93
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/05 -N43 : paragraphs 44, 91
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -2/06 : paragraph 54
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -215/06 : paragraphs 1, 18, 19, 23, 25, 33, 35, 37, 45, 46, 48, 57, 59, 64 - 67, 81, 84, 89, 97 - 99, 101, 104, 106, 118, 120, 122, 130, 135
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -215/06 -N58 : paragraph 73
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -215/06 -N59 : paragraph 51
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -215/06 -N61 : paragraph 78
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -121/07 -N21 : paragraph 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -610/10 -N67 : paragraph 84
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/11 -N42 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/11 -N43 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/11 -N46 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/11 -N57 : paragraph 115
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/13 -N117 : paragraph 114
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/13 -N118 : paragraph 114
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -378/13 -N29 : paragraph 89
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/15 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/15 -N37 : paragraph 78
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/15 -N38 : paragraph 79
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/15 -N40 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/15 -N43 : paragraph 80
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -433/15 -N56 : paragraph 89
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/16 : paragraphs 53, 107
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/16 -N33 : paragraph 73
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/16 -N34 : paragraph 74
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/16 -N35 : paragraphs 39, 75, 117
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/16 -N37 : paragraph 76
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/16 -N38 : paragraph 76
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/16 -N39 : paragraph 78
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/16 -N41 : paragraph 77
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -328/16 -N94 : paragraph 121
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -328/16 -N99 : paragraph 122
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -328/16 -N100 : paragraph 123
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -328/16 -N101 : paragraph 124
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/17 -N107 : paragraph 111
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/17 -N108 : paragraph 127
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/17 -N117 : paragraph 131
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/17 -N118 : paragraph 131
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/17 -N119 : paragraph 132
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/17 -N120 : paragraph 133
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/17 -N153 : paragraph 112
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/17 -N154 : paragraph 113
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/17 -N156 : paragraph 114
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/17 -N157 : paragraph 114
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/17 -N158 : paragraph 114
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -117/17 : paragraphs 53, 107
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -117/17 -N30 : paragraph 39

Operative part

• Reference : TFEU, Article 260 -P1

Opinion

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 226 : points 5, 55
  
• TFEU, Article 258 : point 23
  
• TFEU, Article 260 : point 1
  
• TFEU, Article 260 -P1 : points 26, 72, 76
  
• TFEU, Article 260 -P2 : points 1, 64, 66
  
• TEU, Article 4 : point 35
  
• Directive 85/337 : points 4, 5, 9, 13, 15, 21, 22, 24, 27 - 31, 33 - 36, 40, 43, 46, 53, 55, 63, 69
  
• Directive 85/337 -A02 : point 6
  
• Directive 85/337 -A02P1 : points 30, 41
  
• Directive 85/337 -A04 : point 6
  
• Directive 85/337 -A05 : points 6, 7
  
• Directive 85/337 -A05P3T2 : point 31
  
• Directive 85/337 -A06 : point 6
  
• Directive 85/337 -A07 : point 6
  
• Directive 85/337 -A08 : point 6
  
• Directive 85/337 -A09 : point 6
  
• Directive 85/337 -A10 : point 6
  
• Directive 85/337 -C1 : point 31
  
• Directive 85/337 -C6 : point 30
  
• Directive 85/337 -N4 : point 7
  
• Directive 97/11 : point 6
  
• Directive 2001/42 : point 35
  
• Directive 2003/35 -A09P1 : point 31
  
• Directive 2011/92 : points 4, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A62P2 : point 19
  
• Commission - SEC Document - 52005SC1658 : points 64, 69, 72, 73, 75
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52017XC1215(01) : points 64, 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/95 -N31 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -435/97 -N40 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/02 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/02 -N64 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/02 -N65 : points 35, 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/02 -N69 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/03 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -332/04 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -486/04 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/05 -N43 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -255/05 -N50 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -255/05 -N51 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -215/06 : points 1, 76
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -2/07 -N42 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -2/07 -N43 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/09 -N37 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -404/09 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/11 -N42 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/11 -N43 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/11 -N45 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/11 -N46 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/11 -N69 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/13 -N57 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/13 -N87 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/13 -N95 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/13 -N97 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -141/14 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/14 -N47 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/14 -N52 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/14 -N54 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/14 -N66 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/15 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/15 -N40 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/15 -N41 : points 22, 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/15 -N42 : points 22, 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/15 -N43 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/15 -N44 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/16 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/16 -N33 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/16 -N35 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -117/17 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -117/17 -N30 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -349/17 -N137 : point 40
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 13/04/2018

Date of the Opinion

• 13/06/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

12/11/2019

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 10 from 13.01.2020, p.9

Application: OJ C 240 from 09.07.2018, p.25

Name of the parties

Commission v Ireland (Derrybrien Wind Farm)

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Simonelli, Marco Antonio: ‘‘. . . And Justice for all?’’ : the right to an independent tribunal after the ruling of the Court of Justice in LM, New Journal of European Criminal Law 2019 Vol. 10 nº 4 p. 329-341 (EN)
2. Beijen, B.A.: Jurisprudentie bestuursrecht 2020 nº 16-18 (NL)
3. Ortlep, R.: Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2020 nº 50 p.344 (NL)
4. Rigaux, Anne: Recours en manquement - Sanctions pécuniaires, Europe 2020 Janvier Comm. nº 1 p.5 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Environment
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Action for a declaration of failure to fulfil obligations : application granted
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Bonichot

Advocate General

Pitruzzella

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• Italian