Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 18 : paragraphs 1, 34
• TFEU, Article 45 -P2 : paragraphs 1, 34
• Directive 2004/38 : paragraphs 39, 45, 46, 47
• Directive 2004/38 -A06 : paragraph 10
• Directive 2004/38 -A06P1 : paragraphs 36, 41, 42, 51, 53
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1 : paragraph 11
• Directive 2004/38 -A14 : paragraph 12
• Directive 2004/38 -A14P1 : paragraphs 42, 50
• Directive 2004/38 -A24 : paragraphs 1, 36, 53, 55
• Directive 2004/38 -A24P1 : paragraphs 38, 40
• Directive 2004/38 -A24P2 : paragraphs 34, 36, 37, 40, 43, 49, 51, 53
• Directive 2004/38 -C10 : paragraphs 9, 39, 45
• Directive 2004/38 -C16 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/38 -C21 : paragraph 9
• Regulation 883/2004 : paragraph 35
• Regulation 883/2004 -A03P3 : paragraph 35
• Regulation 883/2004 -A04 : paragraphs 1, 6, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53
• Regulation 883/2004 -A70 : paragraphs 1, 7, 35
• Regulation 883/2004 -A70P1 : paragraph 34
• Regulation 883/2004 -A70P2 : paragraphs 34, 36, 51, 52, 53
• Regulation 883/2004 -A70P4 : paragraphs 34, 52
• Regulation 883/2004 -N10 : paragraph 8
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -424/10 -N39 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N44 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N64 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N69 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N78 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 : paragraphs 35, 54
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N69 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N70 : paragraphs 42, 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N74 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N83 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -299/14 -N70 : paragraph 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/14 -N44 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/14 -N45 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/14 -N46 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/14 -N49 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/14 -N50 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/14 -N51 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/14 -N60 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/14 -N61 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/14 -N62 : paragraph 50

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2004/38 -A24
• Interprets : Regulation 883/2004 -A04

Opinion

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 12 : point 56
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 39 : point 56
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7 : points 77, 78
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P1 : point 78
  
• TFEU, Article 18 : points 39, 56, 62, 64, 65, 76, 79, 81
  
• TFEU, Article 18 -L1 : points 5, 56, 63
  
• TFEU, Article 20 : point 76
  
• TFEU, Article 20 -P2L1LA : point 62
  
• TFEU, Article 20 -P2L2 : point 63
  
• TFEU, Article 21 -P1 : point 63
  
• TFEU, Article 45 : points 6, 56
  
• TFEU, Article 45 -P2 : points 6, 39, 50, 79, 81, 84, 88, 91
  
• TFEU, Article 267 : point 39
  
• TFEU, Article 21 : point 76
  
• Directive 64/221 : points 4, 91
  
• Directive 68/360 : points 4, 91
  
• Regulation 1612/68 : points 4, 91
  
• Regulation 1612/68 -A07P2 : point 73
  
• Directive 72/194 : points 4, 91
  
• Directive 73/148 : points 4, 91
  
• Directive 75/34 : points 4, 91
  
• Directive 75/35 : points 4, 91
  
• Directive 90/364 : points 4, 91
  
• Directive 90/365 : points 4, 91
  
• Directive 93/96 : points 4, 91
  
• Directive 2004/38 : points 48, 49, 57 - 59, 70, 74, 76, 91
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A06 : point 12
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07 : points 13, 57
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1LB : point 46
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P3 : point 4
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A14 : point 14
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A14P4LB : point 53
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A24 : points 15, 64
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A24P1 : points 54, 65
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A24P2 : points 39, 43 - 46, 50, 53, 55, 56, 65, 66, 69, 75, 76, 78, 91
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C10 : points 11, 70
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C16 : point 11
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C21 : point 11
  
• Regulation 883/2004 : points 1, 39, 46, 58, 74
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A03 : point 7
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A03P3 : point 39
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A04 : points 8, 39, 43, 54, 58, 64
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A70 : points 9, 39
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A70P1 : point 39
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A70P2 : points 39, 64, 88, 91
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -A70P4 : point 39
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -N10 : point 10
  
• Regulation 883/2004 -TIT3CH9 : point 9
  
• Regulation 1244/2010 : points 1, 91
  
• Regulation 492/2011 -A07P2 : points 73, 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/98 -N28 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99 -N31 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -138/02 -N30 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -138/02 -N31 : points 73, 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -138/02 -N58 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -138/02 -N63 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -138/02 -N70 : points 83, 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -258/04 -N22 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -22/08 -N63 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/08 : points 50, 82
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/08 -N34 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/08 -N35 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/08 -N37 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/08 -N38 : point 82
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/08 -N39 : points 83, 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/08 -N40 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/08 -N45 : points 46, 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/08 -N46 : point 56
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -503/09 -N100 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/11 -N25 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/11 -N34 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/11 -N46 : points 83, 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/11 -N49 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/11 -N50 : points 87, 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/11 -N51 : point 87
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/12 -N25 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/12 -N27 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/12 -N28 : point 62
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/12 -N33 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N46 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N56 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N57 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/12 -N58 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -333/13 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -333/13 -N65 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -333/13 -N66 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -333/13 -N67 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -333/13 -N68 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -333/13 -N69 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -333/13 -N70 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -333/13 -N72 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -333/13 -N741 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 : points 3, 40, 49, 55, 60, 69, 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N55 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N57 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N58 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N59 : points 56, 62
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N60 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N61 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N64 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N67 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N68 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N69 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N70 : points 55, 69, 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N71 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N72 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N73 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N74 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N75 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N76 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N77 : points 57, 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N78 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/13 -N79 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -67/14 : points 3, 48, 67, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -67/14 -N54 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -67/14 -N55 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -67/14 -N56 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -67/14 -N57 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -67/14 -N58 : point 48
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 17/06/2014

Date of the Opinion

• 04/06/2015

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

25/02/2016

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 145 from 25.04.2016, p.7

Application: OJ C 315 from 15.09.2014, p.38

Name of the parties

García-Nieto and Others

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Leopold, Anders: Luxembourg locuta -causa finita? - Was kommt nach Dano, Alimanovic und Garcia-Nieto? - Folgerungen aus der Rechtsprechung des EuGH für das deutsche Sozialrecht, Arbeit und Recht 2015 p.397-403 (DE)
2. Carlier, Jean-Yves: La libre circulation des personnes dans l’Union européenne, Journal de droit européen 2016 nº 1 p.153-159 (FR)
3. Holst-Christensen, Nina: Sag C-299/14, Garcia-Nieto, EU-ret & Menneskeret 2016 nº 1 p.41-44 (DA)
4. Oosterom-Staples, H.: Is de bestaansmiddeleneis de achilleshiel van het recht op vrij verkeer van personen?, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2016 p.203-210 (NL)
5. Takis, Athanasios: Armenopoulos 2016 p.722-723 (EL)
6. Frenz, Walter: Die EU ist keine Sozialunion, Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 2016 p.501-503 (DE)
7. Driguez, Laetitia: Prestations d'assistance sociale, Europe 2016 Avril Comm. nº 4 p.22 (FR)
8. Shuibhne, Niamh Nic: ‘WHAT I TELL YOU THREE TIMES IS TRUE’ Lawful Residence and Equal Treatment after Dano, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2016 p.908-936 (EN)
9. Pfersich, Andreas: Unionsbürgerschaft, Gleichbehandlung, Sozialhilfe, Ausschluss, erste drei Monate des Aufenthalts, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2016 p.189 (DE)
10. Berger, Maria ; Pelzl, Alexander: Ausschluss von Unionsbürgern aus anderen Mitgliedstaaten von bestimmten Sozialleistungen während der ersten drei Monate ihres Aufenthalts unionsrechtskonform, Österreichische Juristenzeitung 2016 p.474 (DE)
11. Hojnik, Janja: Načelo enakega obravnavanja državljanov drugih držav članic EU, ko gre za socialne pravice, Davčno-finančna praksa : davki, finance, zavarovalnistvo 2016 n° 3 p.23-26 (SL)
12. Wallrabenstein, Astrid: Die Gleichheit der Freiheit, Zeitschrift für europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 2016 p.349-357 (DE)
13. Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Renaudière, Géraldine: Libre circulation des personnes dans l'Union européenne, Journal de droit européen 2018 p.141-151 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen - Germany

Subject-matter

• Social security
  
• Citizenship of the Union
  
• area of freedom, security and justice
  
• - Border checks
  
• non-discrimination
  
• Freedom of movement for workers
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Sozialgesetzbuch, Zweites Buch (SGB II), Paragraphen 7 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Nr. 1

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Berger

Advocate General

Wathelet

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French