Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 19 November 2019

Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office

Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed

Case C-660/19 P



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Application (OJ)
13/12/2019 Nonnemacher v EUIPO
Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- Trade marks
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Order
ECLI:EU:C:2019:996		 19/11/2019 Nonnemacher v EUIPO
Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- Trade marks
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks
Available in :
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Order (Information)
ECLI:EU:C:2019:996		 19/11/2019 Nonnemacher v EUIPO
Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- Trade marks
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

Not yet published (General Report - Section 'Information on unpublished decisions')

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
-
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.04 Scheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed
      3.10.04.03 Criteria for appeals to be allowed to proceed
-
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.04 Scheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed
      3.10.04.02 Formal requirements of the request that the appeal be allowed to proceed
-
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.04 Scheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed
      3.10.04.03 Criteria for appeals to be allowed to proceed
-
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.04 Scheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed
      3.10.04.03 Criteria for appeals to be allowed to proceed


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 02/09/2019

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

19/11/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Order: OJ C 10 from 13.01.2020, p.23

Name of the parties

Nonnemacher v EUIPO

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment
  • Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility

Formation of the Court

Chambre d’admission des pourvois (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Jarukaitis

Advocate General

Szpunar

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available