Reports of Cases

1989 03199

Swedish X/00187 Finnish X/00201

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 119 : paragraph 22
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 177 : paragraphs 7 - 9
• Directive 75/117 : paragraphs 1, 5, 10 - 25
• Directive 75/117 -A06 : paragraph 14
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -170/84 : paragraphs 22, 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -318/86 : paragraph 12

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 75/117

Opinion

• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 119 : points 1, 26, 36, 45, 53
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 177 : points 16 - 24
  
• Directive 75/117 : points 1, 5, 25 - 56
  
• Directive 75/117 -A04 : points 24, 45
  
• Directive 75/117 -A06 : point 36
  
• Directive 76/207 : points 36, 45
  
• Directive 76/207 -A03 : points 24, 45
  
• Directive 76/207 -A04 : points 24, 45
  
• Directive 76/207 -A05 : points 24, 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/82 : points 24, 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/83 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/83 : points 24, 45
  
• Directive 75/117 -A01 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -312/86 : point 45
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 05/04/1988

Date of the Opinion

• 31/05/1989

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

17/10/1989

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 124 from 11.05.1988, p.8

Judgment: OJ C 289 from 17.11.1989, p.3

Name of the parties

Handels- og Kontorfunktionærernes Forbund i Danmark v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, agissant pour Danfoss

Notes on Academic Writings

1. De Vos, Dominique: La preuve du contraire, Journal des tribunaux du travail 1990 p.196-197
2. Szyszczak, Erika: European Court Rulings on Discrimination and Part-time Work and the Burden of Proof in Equal Pay Claims, The Industrial Law Journal 1990 p.114-120
3. Shaw, Josephine: The Burden of Proof and the Legality of Supplementary Payments in Equal Pay Cases, European Law Review 1990 p.260-266
4. Nielsen, Ruth ; Precht, Kirsten: Procesret og ligeløn - nye EF-krav til dansk ret, Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen 1990 B p.252-260
5. X: Revue de jurisprudence sociale 1990 p.193
6. Ballestrero, Maria Vittoria: La prova della discriminazione indiretta: ancora un passo avanti della Corte di giustizia, Rivista italiana di diritto del lavoro 1990 II p.781-798
7. Colneric, Ninon: Neue Entscheidungen des EuGH zur Gleichbehandlung von Männern und Frauen, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 1991 p.75-79
8. Mok, M.R.: TVVS ondernemingsrecht en rechtspersonen 1991 p.108
9. Prechal, Sacha: S.E.W. ; Sociaal-economische wetgeving 1992 p.183-196
10. Steyger, E.: Rechtspraak vrouwen en recht in 231 uitspraken en annotaties 1992 p.489-494
11. Robalo Cordeiro, António José: Divulgação do Direito Comunitário 1992 nº 10 187-193
12. Beck, Gunnar: The state of EC anti-sex discrimination law and the judgment in Cadman, or how the legal can become the political, European Law Review 2007 p.549-562

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Faglig voldgiftsret - Denmark

Subject-matter

• Social policy
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Lov nr. 237 af 05/05/1986 om lige løn til mænd og kvinder

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Cour plénière (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Joliet

Advocate General

Lenz

Language(s) of the Case

• Danish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• German