Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7 : paragraph 47
• TFEU, Article 20 : paragraphs 1, 22, 25, 27, 32, 34, 35, 37, 41 - 44, 46, 47, 49 - 56, 58, 63
• TFEU, Article 21 : paragraph 29
• Directive 2004/38 : paragraphs 29, 30
• Directive 2004/38 -A03 : paragraph 19
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P1 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2004/38 -A07 : paragraphs 20, 21, 28, 31
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P2 : paragraph 4
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02 -N30 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02 -N31 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02 -N32 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02 -N33 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14 -N81 : paragraphs 44, 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -304/14 -N36 : paragraphs 44, 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/15 -N75 : paragraphs 52, 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/15 -N76 : paragraphs 52, 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/15 -N77 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N40 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N47 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N48 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N49 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N50 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N51 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N52 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N54 : paragraph 51
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N65 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N74 : paragraph 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N75 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 -N92 : paragraph 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N37 : paragraph 60
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/18 -N30 : paragraph 31

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 20

Opinion

• TFEU, Article 20 : points 1, 16, 42, 44 - 46, 61, 62, 64 - 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
  
• TFEU, Article 20 -P1 : point 49
  
• TFEU, Article 21 : point 42
  
• Directive 2004/38 : points 23, 24, 27, 32, 33, 40, 74
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A01 : point 3
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1 : point 5
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1LB : points 20, 22, 28, 29, 35 - 37, 42
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P2 : point 5
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02 -N30 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02 -N31 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02 -N32 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02 -N33 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -408/03 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -408/03 -N39 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -578/08 -N43 : points 39, 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11 -N63 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11 -N41 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14 -N36 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14 -N48 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -218/14 -N75 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -304/14 -N30 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/15 : point 2
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/16 : point 2
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/17 -N31 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/17 -N32 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/17 -N33 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -710/17 -N22 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -203/18 -N43 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -203/18 -N44 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -203/18 -N45 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -203/18 -N46 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -203/18 -N47 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -203/18 -N48 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -203/18 -N49 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -203/18 -N50 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/18 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/18 -N30 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/18 -N35 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/18 -N36 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -94/18 -N54 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/18 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/18 -N33 : point 39
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 28/12/2018

Date of the Opinion

• 21/11/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

27/02/2020

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real (Spouse of a Union citizen)

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Rigaux, Anne: Citoyenneté européenne - Regroupement familial, Europe 2020, n° 4 Avril, Comm. 113 (FR)
2. Réveillère, Vincent: La protection statutaire du citoyen : demeurer sur le territoire de l'Union (dans son État de nationalité), Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2020, n° 3, p. 721-726 (FR)
3. Neier, Christina: Residence right under Article 20 TFEU not dependent on sufficient resources: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Reals : Case C-836/18, Common Market Law Review 2021 p. 549-570 (EN)
4. Benlolo Carabot, Myriam: VI. Citoyenneté - Cour de justice, 27 février 2020, Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real c/ RH, aff. C-836/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:119, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2020. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2021, p. 414-419 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha - Spain

Subject-matter

• Citizenship of the Union
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

cinquième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Lycourgos

Advocate General

Pikamäe

Language(s) of the Case

• Spanish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French