Reports of Cases

1990 I-03763

Swedish X/00531 Finnish X/00555

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Regulation 1251/70 : paragraphs 1, 7, 11, 21, 28, 48 - 55
• Directive 64/221 -A08 : paragraphs 2, 9, 14, 26, 57 - 60, 66
• Directive 64/221 -A09 : paragraphs 2, 9, 14, 26, 61 - 69
• Directive 64/221 : paragraph 28
• Directive 90/364 : paragraph 15
• Directive 90/365 : paragraph 15
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/83 : paragraph 18
• Regulation 1612/68 : paragraphs 20, 28, 45, 55
• Directive 68/360 : paragraphs 21, 28, 55
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 48 : paragraph 22
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -35/82 : paragraph 23
• Directive 64/221 -A01 : paragraphs 26, 27, 56
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 177 : paragraphs 31 - 43
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 177 -L2 : paragraph 32
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 177 -L3 : paragraph 32
• Regulation 1612/68 -A10 : paragraphs 44, 48, 54
• Directive 68/360 -A01 : paragraphs 45, 46
• Directive 68/360 -A03P1 : paragraph 45
• Directive 68/360 -A03P2 : paragraph 45
• Directive 68/360 -A04 : paragraph 46
• Directive 68/360 -A04P3 : paragraph 46
• Directive 68/360 -A10 : paragraph 47
• Regulation 1251/70 -A01 : paragraph 48
• Regulation 1251/70 -A03 : paragraph 48
• Regulation 1251/70 -A03P1 : paragraph 49
• Regulation 1251/70 -A02 : paragraphs 49, 50
• Regulation 1251/70 -A02P1LBL2 : paragraph 50
• Regulation 1251/70 -A02P2 : paragraph 50
• Regulation 1251/70 -A03P2 : paragraph 51
• Regulation 1251/70 -A05P1 : paragraph 52
• Regulation 1251/70 -A05P2 : paragraph 52
• Regulation 1251/70 -A06 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/79 : paragraphs 58, 59, 66
• Directive 64/221 -A09P1 : paragraphs 62, 63
• Directive 64/221 -A09P2 : paragraph 63
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/81 : paragraphs 64, 65

Operative part

• Interprets : Regulation 1612/68
• Interprets : Directive 68/360
• Interprets : Regulation 1251/70
• Interprets : Directive 64/221
• Interprets : Directive 64/221 -A08
• Interprets : Directive 64/221 -A09

Opinion

• Court of Justice - Judgment C -35/82 : points 2, 6
  
• Directive 64/221 : points 5, 13
  
• Directive 64/221 -A09 : points 5, 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/79 : point 8
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -244/80 : point 8
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -166/73 : point 8
  
• Directive 64/221 -A08 : point 16
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 12/10/1988

Date of the Opinion

• 03/07/1990

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

18/10/1990

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Applications: OJ C 293 from 17.11.1988, p.8 ; OJ C 184 from 21.07.1989, p.7

Judgment: OJ C 288 from 16.11.1990, p.6

Name of the parties

Dzodzi v Belgian State

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Martin, Denis: Du bon usage de l'article 177 du traité de Rome, Revue de jurisprudence de Liège, Mons et Bruxelles 1991 p.189-191 (FR)
2. Simon, Denys: Chronique de jurisprudence de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes. Institutions et ordre juridique communautaire, Journal du droit international 1991 p.455-457 (FR)
3. Verschueren, Herwig: L'arrêt Dzodzi et l'équilibre précaire entre le droit national et le droit communautaire, Revue du droit des étrangers 1991 p.95-99 (FR)
4. X: Il Foro italiano 1991 IV Col.217-219 (IT)
5. Rodière, Pierre: Sur les effets directifs du droit (social) communautaire, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 1991 p.565-586 (FR)
6. Bravo-Ferrer Delgado, Miguel ; La Casta Muñoa, Nieves: Common Market Law Review 1992 p.152-159 (EN)
7. Verschueren, Herwig: Het arrest Dzodzi en het delicate evenwicht tussen het nationale recht en het europese gemeenschapsrecht, Tijdschrift voor vreemdelingenrecht 1992 p.25-30 (NL)
8. Arnull, Anthony: The Evolution of the Court's Jurisdiction under Article 177 EEC, European Law Review 1993 p.129-137 (EN)
9. Banu, Mihai: Hotǎrâre cu titlu preliminar. Competențe ale Curții şi ale instanțelor naționale., Revista română de drept al afacerilor 2009 nº 01 p.133-146 (RO)
10. Jauréguiberry, Arnaud: La discrimination à rebours devant le juge national, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2017 p.39-57 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles - Belgium

Subject-matter

• Freedom of movement for workers
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Libellé à effacer

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Cour plénière (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Grévisse

Advocate General

Darmon

Language(s) of the Case

• French
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French