Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.04 Free movement of persons and services
4.04.02 Freedom of establishment
4.04.02.00 General
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 43
: paragraphs 1, 19, 26, 27, 35, 36, 59
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 48
: paragraphs 1, 26, 27, 59
-
TFEU, Article 49
: paragraphs 1, 19, 26, 27
-
TFEU, Article 54
: paragraphs 1, 26, 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/04
-N42 : paragraph 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -231/05
-N54 : paragraph 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
: paragraphs 14, 20, 22, 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N44 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N63 : paragraph 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N69 : paragraph 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N71 : paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N72 : paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -371/10
-N42 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -35/11
-N91 : paragraph 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -123/11
-N41 : paragraph 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -385/12
-N22 : paragraph 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/13
-N27 : paragraph 40
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -686/13
-N18 : paragraph 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -388/14
-N26 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -388/14
-N29 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -593/14
-N24 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -593/14
-N25 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -593/14
-N28 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -593/14
-N35 : paragraph 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -292/16
-N28 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -292/16
-N30 : paragraph 40
Operative part
Opinion
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 43
: points 14, 15, 17, 135
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 48
: points 14, 15, 17, 135
-
TFEU, Article 49
: points 15, 17, 103, 135
-
TFEU, Article 54
: points 15, 17, 135
-
Agreement between Member States - 41990A0436
: point 74
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52008XC0620(02)
: point 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/74
-N5 : point 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -270/83
-N20 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -270/83
-N27 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -55/94
-N37 : point 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -250/95
: point 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -250/95
-N22 : point 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -376/03
: point 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -446/03
-N39 : points 20, 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -446/03
-N46 : point 21
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/04
-N68 : point 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -513/04
-N22 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -513/04
-N23 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -513/04
-N24 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -524/04
-N59 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -524/04
-N60 : point 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -231/05
: points 66, 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -231/05
-N38 : point 57
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -311/08
-N45 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
: points 13, 19, 41, 45, 119
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N39 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N42 : point 124
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N43 : point 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N44 : points 47, 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N45 : point 73
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N54 : point 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N56 : points 34, 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N60 : point 96
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N62 : point 97
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N63 : points 21, 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/08
-N72 : point 126
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -337/08
-N22 : point 57
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -371/10
-N45 : point 21
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -18/11
-N23 : point 21
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -35/11
: point 17
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -388/14
-N26 : point 40
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -48/15
-N57 : point 60
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -270/15
-N40 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -270/15
-N41 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -270/15
-N42 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -270/15
-N43 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -270/15
-N44 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -270/15
-N45 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -270/15
-N46 : point 61
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
31/05/2018
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 259 from 23.07.2018, p.5
Application: OJ C 343 from 19.09.2016, p.34
Name of the parties
Hornbach-Baumarkt
Notes on Academic Writings
- Peraldi-Leneuf, Fabienne: Liberté d'établissement - Discrimination fiscale, Europe 2018 Juillet Comm. nº 7 p.23 (FR)
- Rasch, Stephan ; Chwalek, Martin J. ; Bühl, Lukas: Zur Entscheidung des EuGH über die Vereinbarkeit von Niederlassungsfreiheit und § 1 AStG, Internationale Steuer-Rundschau : ISR 2018 N.8 p.275-280 (DE)
- Ditz, Xaver ; Quilitzsch, Carsten: Verrechnungspreise: Europarechtswidrigkeit des § 1 AStG, Der Betrieb 2018 N°34 p.2009-2013 (DE)
- X: Niederlassungsfreiheit: Keine Einkünftekorrektur nach § 1 Abs. 1 AStG, wenn eine gebietsansässige Gesellschaft gebietsfremden Konzerngesellschaften Vorteile zu nicht fremdüblichen Bedingungen, aber aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen gewährt – “Hornbach-Baumarkt”, Europäisches Wirtschafts- & Steuerrecht - EWS 2018 p.228-231 (DE)
- O'Shea, Tom: CJEU Allows Non-Arm's-Length Transactions If Supported by Commercial Justification, Tax Notes International 2018 Volume 91, Number 3, p.243-248 (EN)
- O'Shea, Tom: A Critical Analysis of the CJEU Advocate General's Opinion In Hornbach-Baumarkt, Tax Notes International 2018 Volume 91, N°4, p.373-383 (EN)
- Schwenke, Michael: Unionsrechtliche Fragestellungen nach der EuGH-Entscheidung „Hornbach-Baumarkt AG“, Der Betrieb 2018 p.2329-2333 (DE)
- Calderon, José M. ; Ribeiro, João Sérgio: Transfer Pricing Rules and the European Commercial Motives Test: A Discussion of Hornbach-Baumarkt, Tax Notes International 2018 Vol. 91 nº 13 p.1325-1330 (EN)
- Schreiber, Rolf ; Greil, Stefan: EuGH-Urteil „Hornbach“: Wirtschaftliche Gründe für marktunübliche Verrechnungspreise - „Mach es zu deinem Projekt!“, Der Betrieb 2018 p.2527-2535 (DE)
- Graw, Christian: Internationales Steuerrecht - § 1 AStG - Folgerungen aus dem EuGH-Urteil in der Rs. Hornbach-Baumarkt, Der Betrieb 2018 p.2655-2658 (DE)
- Calderón Carrero, José Manuel: El test europeo de motivos comerciales aplicado a los precios de transferencia, Scientia Iuridica 2018 p. 423-439 (ES)
- Rasch, Stephan: Anmerkung zum BMF-Schr. v. 6.12.2018 - Wirtschaftliche Gründe für den Abschluss eines Geschäfts unter nicht ,,fremdüblichen Bedingungen‘‘, Internationale Steuer-Rundschau : ISR 2019 p.1-2 (DE)
- Douma, S.C.W.: (HvJ EU) Zaak Hornbach-Baumarkt. Correctie vanwege onzakelijk handelen slechts toegestaan indien belastingplichtige geen commerciële redenen voor dat handelen kan aantonen, Beslissingen in belastingzaken 2019 nº 5, p. 799-800 (NL)
- Kamel, J. ; Mezouar, H.: Het arm's-lengthbeginsel: een gewijzigd begrip, Weekblad voor fiscaal recht 2019 p.348-356 (NL)
- Ditz, Xaver ; Quilitzsch, Carsten: German Transfer Pricing Rules Incompatible with EU Law - A Critical Assessment of the ECJ's Hornbach-Baumarkt (Case C-382/16) Decision, European Taxation 2019 nº 4 p.181-184 (EN)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Finanzgericht Rheinland-Pfalz - Germany
Subject-matter
Provisions of national law referred to
Außensteuergesetz (AStG), Paragraphen 1 Abs. 1 Satz 1, und 2 Nr. 1 Alt. 3
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
deuxième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Rosas
Advocate General
Bobek
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion