Reports of Cases
not yet published (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.04 Pleas in law
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.04 Examination by the Commission
4.08.05.04.03 Commission discretion
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.04 Examination by the Commission
4.08.05.04.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.01 Relevant market
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.05 Concentrations
4.08.05.03 Assessment of compatibility with the internal market
4.08.05.03.02 Assessment criteria
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A36SNT1 : paragraph 122
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A53L1 : paragraph 122
-
TFEU, Article 3
-P1LB : paragraph 93
-
TFEU, Article 101
: paragraph 93
-
TFEU, Article 101
-P1 : paragraph 339
-
TFEU, Article 101
-P3 : paragraph 339
-
TFEU, Article 102
: paragraph 93
-
TFEU, Article 263
: paragraph 73
-
TEU, Article 3
-P3 : paragraph 92
-
TEU, Article 19
: paragraph 100
-
TEU, Article 51
: paragraph 92
-
TFEU - Protocol No 27
: paragraph 92
-
Decision 88/591
-C3 : paragraph 74
-
Regulation 4064/89
: paragraphs 81, 85
-
Regulation 4064/89
-A02P3 : paragraph 83
-
Regulation 139/2004
: paragraphs 73, 84, 85, 91, 93, 99, 100, 120, 159, 234
-
Regulation 139/2004
-A02 : paragraph 75
-
Regulation 139/2004
-A02P3 : paragraphs 70, 79, 83, 86, 88, 90, 96, 98, 105, 107, 173, 235, 241, 284, 286
-
Regulation 139/2004
-A03P1LB : paragraph 1
-
Regulation 139/2004
-A04 : paragraph 1
-
Regulation 139/2004
-A06P1LC : paragraph 7
-
Regulation 139/2004
-A06P2 : paragraph 329
-
Regulation 139/2004
-A08 : paragraph 75
-
Regulation 139/2004
-A09 : paragraph 6
-
Regulation 139/2004
-A09P2LA : paragraph 5
-
Regulation 139/2004
-C5 : paragraph 94
-
Regulation 139/2004
-C6 : paragraph 94
-
Regulation 139/2004
-C8 : paragraph 94
-
Regulation 139/2004
-C24 : paragraph 81
-
Regulation 139/2004
-C25 : paragraphs 80, 95, 96, 98, 150, 172, 173, 235, 241, 434
-
Regulation 139/2004
-C26 : paragraph 82
-
Secondary Legislation - Internal Act of the Institutions - 32015Q0423(01)
-A28 : paragraph 38
-
Secondary Legislation - Internal Act of the Institutions - 32015Q0423(01)
-A89 : paragraphs 35, 42, 55
-
Secondary Legislation - Internal Act of the Institutions - 32015Q0423(01)
-A103P3 : paragraph 31
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0205(02)
: paragraph 77
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0205(02)
-PT14 : paragraph 441
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0205(02)
-PT16 : paragraph 441
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0205(02)
-PT19 : paragraph 442
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0205(02)
-PT20 : paragraph 442
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0205(02)
-PT21 : paragraphs 442, 443
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0205(02)
-PT24 : paragraph 102
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0205(02)
-PT27 : paragraph 436
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0205(02)
-PT28 : paragraphs 104, 238, 241
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0205(02)
-PT37 : paragraphs 160, 452
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0205(02)
-PT38 : paragraph 452
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -68/94
-N143 : paragraph 144
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -185/95
-N41 : paragraph 72
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/99
-N52 : paragraph 100
-
General Court - Judgment T -342/99
-N20 : paragraph 146
-
General Court - Judgment T -342/99
-N53 : paragraph 75
-
General Court - Judgment T -342/99
-N59 : paragraph 115
-
General Court - Judgment T -210/01
: paragraphs 193, 194
-
General Court - Judgment T -210/01
-N364 : paragraph 116
-
General Court - Judgment T -210/01
-N464 : paragraph 113
-
General Court - Judgment T -282/02
-N201 : paragraph 437
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -12/03
-N72 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -12/03
-N73 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -12/03
-N74 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -12/03
-N75 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -12/03
-N76 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -12/03
-N77 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/03
-N39 : paragraph 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/03
-N42 : paragraph 112
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/03
-N44 : paragraph 111
-
General Court - Judgment T -87/05
-N49 : paragraph 84
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -413/06
-N209 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -413/06
-N210 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -413/06
-N211 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/06
-N51 : paragraphs 110, 113
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/06
-N169 : paragraph 121
-
General Court - Judgment T -282/06
: paragraphs 236, 237
-
General Court - Judgment T -282/06
-N138 : paragraph 444
-
General Court - Judgment T -342/07
: paragraph 237
-
General Court - Judgment T -342/07
-N26 : paragraph 107
-
General Court - Judgment T -342/07
-N63 : paragraph 236
-
General Court - Judgment T -342/07
-N224 : paragraph 360
-
General Court - Judgment T -405/08
-N58 : paragraph 99
-
General Court - Judgment T -405/08
-N116 : paragraph 144
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/09
-N20 : paragraph 93
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/09
-N21 : paragraph 93
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/09
-N22 : paragraph 93
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -252/10
-N46 : paragraph 122
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -559/12
-N34 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -559/12
-N35 : paragraph 118
-
General Court - Judgment T -79/12
-N118 : paragraph 114
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/14
-N68 : paragraph 100
-
General Court - Judgment T -691/14
-N238 : paragraph 93
-
General Court - Judgment T -712/15
-N75 : paragraph 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -135/16
-N19 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -248/16
-N21 : paragraph 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -621/16
-N104 : paragraph 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -633/16
-N41 : paragraph 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -265/17
-N32 : paragraph 108
Operative part
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
28/05/2020
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Information not available
Name of the parties
CK Telecoms UK Investments v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Furse, Mark: Locking down the meaning of SIEC in the EUMR - CK Telecoms: CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd v European Commission (T-399/16) EU:T:2020:217, European Competition Law Review 2020, n° 9, p. p. 427-433 (EN)
- Nuys, Marcel ; Penz-Evren, Juliana: Vier zu Drei Fusionen, a new hope! : zugleich Anmerkung zu EuG in Sachen CK Telecoms UK (T-399/16), Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht 2020 p. 432-435 (DE)
- Idot, Laurence: Concurrence - Concentration sur un marché oligopolistique, Europe 2020, n° 7 Juillet, Comm. 225 (FR)
- Béquet, Gaëlle D.G.M.G.: CK Telecoms UK/Commissie : Case T‑399/16 : noot, Mediaforum: Tijdschrift voor Media- en Communicatierecht 2020 nº 5 p. 190-192 (NL)
- Ginneken, Pepijn P.J. van ; Béquet, Gaëlle D.G.M.G.: Het CK Telecoms-arrest : vier is (g)een magisch getal : uitspraak van het Gerecht van 28 mei 2020, zaak T-399/16, ECLI:EU:T:2020:217 (CK Telecoms UK/Commissie), Markt & Mededinging 2020 p. 258-262 (NL)
- Monti, Giorgio: EU merger control after CK Telecoms UK Investments v. Commission : [Case T-399/16], World Competition 2020 nº 4 p. 447-472 (EN)
- Caspary, Tobias ; Bozhikov, Valeri: CK Telecoms UK Investments v Commission : the judgment that defines a significant impediment to effective competition in oligopolistic merger cases : case T-399/16, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2020 Vol. 11 nº 7 p. 363-366 (EN)
- Fountoukakos, Kyriakos ; Puech-Baron, Camille: Towards a higher standard of proof and a more interventionist judicial review in antitrust cases involving complex (economic) assessments following CK Telecoms? : case T-399/16, CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd v Commission, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2020 Vol. 11 nº 8 p. 460-467 (EN)
- Déchamps, Pascale ; Valois Turk, Maurice de: Mixed signals? : where does the Hutchison judgment leave economic analysis of non-coordinated effects? : T-399/16 Hutchison versus Commission, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2020 Vol. 11 nº 9 p. 531-536 (EN)
- Buhart, Jacques ; Henry, David: CK Telecoms v Commission: a heightened and universal standard of proof under the EUMR ?, European Competition Law Review 2020, n° 12, p. 587-595 (EN)
- Braeken, Bas J.H. ; Versteeg, X.Y.G. (Jade): CK Telecoms/Commissie: ‘bridging the gap’ tussen Airtours en SIEC-test? : Gerecht 28 mei 2020, zaak T-399/16, (CK Telecoms UK Investments/Commissie), Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2021 p. 7-12 (NL)
- Kraihammer, Marie Theres ; Zhang, Anthony: Economic analysis in the Three-O2 merger decision : CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd v European Commission (T-399/16), European Competition Law Review 2021, n° 2, p. 106-110 (EN)
- Schmidt-Kessen, Maria José: CK Telecoms v Commission (Three/O2) - a new chapter on the standard of proof for unilateral effects in horizontal mergers : CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd v European Commission (T-399/16) : case comment, European Competition Law Review 2021, n° 3, p. 168-170 (EN)
- Ibáñez Colomo, Pablo: EU merger control between law and discretion : when is an impediment to effective competition significant? : T-399/16, World Competition 2021 nº 4 p. 347-372 (EN)
- Witt, Lola: Die Beweisanforderungen an die Kommission in der Europäischen Fusionskontrolle Entscheidung des EuG in der Rechtssache CK Telecoms UK Investments/Kommission : Urteil vom 28.5.2020 : T-399/16, Zeitschrift für europäisches Privatrecht 2022 p. 337-365 (DE)
- Deutscher, Elias: Prometheus bound? : the uncertain future of the unilateral effects analysis in EU merger control after CK Telecoms : (Case T-399/16), Journal of Competition Law and Economics 2022 Vol. 2 p. 323-399 (EN)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Competition
- - Concentrations between undertakings
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : application granted
Formation of the Court
première chambre élargie (Tribunal)
Judge-Rapporteur
Öberg
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available