Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.03 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
4.06.03.01 Harmonization of laws
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.03 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
4.06.03.01 Harmonization of laws
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EU Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 31
: paragraph 53
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 6
: paragraph 68
-
TFEU
: paragraph 37
-
TFEU, Article 82
-P1LD : paragraph 55
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
: paragraphs 37, 53
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A01 : paragraph 4
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A01P1 : paragraphs 46, 58
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A01P2 : paragraph 45
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A01P3 : paragraph 70
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A03 : paragraphs 5, 45
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A04 : paragraphs 5, 45
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A04BIS : paragraphs 5, 45
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A05 : paragraphs 5, 45
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A06 : paragraph 6
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A06P1 : paragraphs 1, 12, 13, 17, 19, 21, 22, 25, 28, 30, 31, 42, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 72, 73, 88, 90
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-C5 : paragraphs 3, 56
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-C6 : paragraphs 3, 44
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-C8 : paragraph 3
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-C10 : paragraph 3
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A105P1 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A107 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -306/09
-N49 : paragraph 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -486/14
: paragraph 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/15
-N55 : paragraph 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/15
-N56 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
: paragraphs 14, 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N21 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N28 : paragraph 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N30 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N31 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N32 : paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N33 : paragraph 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N35 : paragraph 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/16
: paragraphs 14, 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
: paragraph 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N29 : paragraph 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N31 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N32 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N33 : paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N34 : paragraph 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N36 : paragraph 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N41 : paragraph 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N42 : paragraph 73
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N47 : paragraph 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -571/17
-N69 : paragraph 57
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N36 : paragraph 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N41 : paragraph 45
-
Court of Justice - Order C -508/18
: paragraph 33
Operative part
Opinion
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
: points 65, 68
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-L2 : point 86
-
TFEU, Article 82
: point 40
-
TFEU, Article 267
: point 14
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A01 : point 4
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A01P2 : point 31
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A06 : points 5, 95
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A06P1 : points 2, 11, 14, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, 43, 46, 47, 49, 50, 78, 100
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A08P1LC : points 1, 45, 47 - 50, 52
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A12 : point 63
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A17 : point 63
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A17P3 : point 58
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A17P4 : point 58
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A23P2 : point 58
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A23P3 : point 58
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-A23P4 : point 58
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-C5 : point 3
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-C6 : points 3, 63
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0584
-C10 : points 3, 63
-
Directive 2014/41
: point 39
-
Directive 2014/41
-A01 : point 38
-
Directive 2014/41
-A02LCPT1 : point 38
-
Directive 2016/800
: point 38
-
Directive 2016/800
-C47 : point 38
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -404/15
: point 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/15
-N27 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/15
-N55 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/15
-N56 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -452/16
: points 45, 71
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -453/16
-N39 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -453/16
-N40 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -453/16
-N41 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -453/16
-N42 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -453/16
-N45 : point 1
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -453/16
-N51 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -453/16
-N52 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N41 : point 86
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N45 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N31 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N32 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N33 : point 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N34 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N35 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N38 : point 47
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N45 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/16
: point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/16
-N32 : point 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/16
-N34 : point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/16
-N36 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N34 : point 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N35 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N36 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N37 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -477/16
-N43 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -220/18
: points 94, 95
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N53 : point 86
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N56 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N58 : point 86
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N63 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/18
-N46 : point 63
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
27/05/2019
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 263 from 05.08.2019, p.21
Application: OJ C 364 from 08.10.2018, p.8
Name of the parties
OG (Parquet de Lübeck)
Notes on Academic Writings
- Ambos, Kai: Juristenzeitung 2019 p.732-736 (DE)
- Benvenuti, Simone: Commento alla sentenza della Corte di giustizia del 27 maggio 2019, Minister for Justice and Equality c. O.G. e P.I., C-508/18 e C-82/19, sulla nozione di “autorità giudiziaria emittente” nel contesto del mandato d’arresto europeo, Rivista della Corte dei conti 2019 nº 3 p.246-253 (IT)
- Michel, Valérie: Autorité judiciaire d'émission, Europe 2019 Juillet Comm. nº 7 p.14-15 (FR)
- Holst-Christensen, Nina: De forenede sager, C-508/18 og C-82/19 PPU, OG og PI, EU-ret & Menneskeret 2019 nº 2 p.27-31 (DA)
- Pomahač, Richard: Soudní dvůr EU : Nezávislost na výkonné moci, Právní rozhledy : časopis pro všechna právní odvětví 2019 p.571-572 (CS)
- Hulst, J.W.: De uitleg van het begrip rechterlijke autoriteit bij de uitvaardiging van een Europees arrestatiebevel, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2019 p.158-165 (NL)
- Ouwerkerk, J.W.: Het begrio 'uitvaardigende rechterlijke autoriteit', Ars aequi 2019 p.1005-1010 (NL)
- Gierok, Markus: Begriff der den Europäischen Haftbefehl "ausstellenden Justizbehörde", IWRZ – Zeitschrift für internationales Wirtschaftsrecht 2019 p.268-269 (DE)
- Catteau, François ; Weyembergh, Anne: Arrêt "OG et PI": la notion d'autorité judiciaire d'émission et l'exigence d'indépendance à la lumière de la décision-cadre relative au mandat d'arrêt européen, Journal de droit européen 2019 nº 263 p.363-366 (FR)
- Heimrich, Chad: European arrest warrants and the independence of the issuing judicial authority : how much independence is required? : (case note on joined cases C-508/18 and C-82/19 PPU OG and PI), New Journal of European Criminal Law 2019 Vol. 10 nº 4 p. 389-398 (EN)
- Ambos, Kai: The German Public Prosecutor as (no) judicial authority within the meaning of the European Arrest Warrant: a case note on the CJEU’s judgment in OG (C-508/18) and PI (C 82/19 PPU), New Journal of European Criminal Law 2019 Vol. 10 nº 4 p. 399-407 (EN)
- Mareş, Mihai ; Şandru, Adrian: Independenţa procurorului : probleme actuale privind cooperarea judiciară internaţională în materie penală, Pandectele Romane: repertoriu trimestrial de jurisprudenta, doctrina si legislatie 2019 Vol. 3 p. 81-90 (RO)
- Ambos, Kai: Sobre las fiscalías alemanas como autoridad de emisión de la orden europea de detención y entrega : comentario a las sentencias del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (Gran Sala), en los asuntos acumulados C-5081/18 y C-92/19 PPU, y en el asunto C-509/18, de 27 de mayo de 2019, Revista española de Derecho Europeo 2019 nº 71 p. 9-20 (ES)
- Alonso Moreda, Nicolás: El fiscal como autoridad judicial de emisión de ‘euro-órdenes’ a la luz de las sentencias del Tribunal de Justicia de 27 de mayo de 2019 en el asunto C-509/18 y en los asuntos acumulados C-508/18 y C-82/19 PPU. ¿Un paso definitivo en su concreción?, Revista General de Derecho Europeo 2019, nº 49, p. 225-249 (ES)
- Böse, Martin: The European arrest warrant and the independence of public prosecutors: OG & PI, PF, JR & YC, Common Market Law Review 2020, n° 4, p. 1259-1282 (EN)
- Flore, Daniel: XIV. Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice - Cour de justice, gde ch., 27 mai 2019, OG et PI (Parquets de Lübeck et de Zwickau), aff. C‑508/18 et C‑82/19 PPU, EU:C:2019:456, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2019. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2020, p. 817-822 (FR)
- Glerum, Vincent Hubrecht: Van stenen, monniken en kappen : het begrip ‘uitvoerende rechterlijke autoriteit’, het arrest Openbaar Ministerie (Valsheid in geschrifte) en de gevolgen voor de Nederlandse overleveringsprocedure, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2021 p. 232-246 (NL)
- Klip, André: The European Arrest Warrant, from Mutual Recognition to Mutual Supervision?, European Criminal Law Review 2022, Volume 12, Issue 1, p. 82-100 (EN)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Supreme Court - Ireland
Subject-matter
- area of freedom, security and justice
- - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
- - police cooperation
Provisions of national law referred to
European Arrest Warrant Act, 2003, 01/01/2004
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
Information not available
Judge-Rapporteur
Jürimäe
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available