Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : paragraph 54
• TFEU, Article 191 -P1 : paragraph 33
• TFEU, Article 191 -P2 : paragraph 33
• TFEU, Article 288 : paragraph 32
• TFEU, Article 288 -L3 : paragraphs 1, 29, 30, 56
• TEU, Article 3 -P3 : paragraph 33
• TEU, Article 4 -P3 : paragraphs 1, 29 - 31, 56
• TEU, Article 19 -P1L2 : paragraphs 1, 29 - 31, 56
• Directive 2008/50 : paragraphs 23, 33, 42, 49, 53, 54
• Directive 2008/50 -A01 : paragraphs 4, 67
• Directive 2008/50 -A02 : paragraph 5
• Directive 2008/50 -A02PT20 : paragraph 64
• Directive 2008/50 -A02PT23 : paragraph 64
• Directive 2008/50 -A04 : paragraphs 6, 20, 28, 35
• Directive 2008/50 -A05 : paragraphs 36, 47
• Directive 2008/50 -A05P1 : paragraph 7
• Directive 2008/50 -A06 : paragraphs 1, 8, 29, 30, 56
• Directive 2008/50 -A06P1 : paragraph 61
• Directive 2008/50 -A06P2 : paragraphs 36, 47
• Directive 2008/50 -A06P3 : paragraph 36
• Directive 2008/50 -A06P4 : paragraph 36
• Directive 2008/50 -A07 : paragraphs 1, 9, 29, 30, 56
• Directive 2008/50 -A07P1 : paragraphs 20, 37
• Directive 2008/50 -A07P2 : paragraph 41
• Directive 2008/50 -A07P3 : paragraph 41
• Directive 2008/50 -A13 : paragraph 1
• Directive 2008/50 -A13P1 : paragraphs 10, 26 - 30, 48, 56 - 59, 67, 68
• Directive 2008/50 -A13P1L3 : paragraph 61
• Directive 2008/50 -A15 : paragraph 11
• Directive 2008/50 -A15P4 : paragraph 64
• Directive 2008/50 -A23 : paragraphs 1, 24
• Directive 2008/50 -A23P1 : paragraphs 12, 25, 29, 48, 57 - 59, 67, 68
• Directive 2008/50 -A23P1L3 : paragraph 65
• Directive 2008/50 -C2 : paragraphs 3, 67
• Directive 2008/50 -C5 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2008/50 -C6 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2008/50 -C7 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2008/50 -C14 : paragraphs 3, 62
• Directive 2008/50 -N2SA : paragraph 36
• Directive 2008/50 -N3 : paragraphs 1, 37, 64
• Directive 2008/50 -N3SAPT1 : paragraphs 13, 61
• Directive 2008/50 -N3SB : paragraph 61
• Directive 2008/50 -N3SBPT1 : paragraph 14
• Directive 2008/50 -N3SBPT1LA : paragraphs 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 44, 56, 62
• Directive 2008/50 -N3SBPT1LAT1 : paragraphs 43, 50
• Directive 2008/50 -N3SBPT1LAT2 : paragraph 63
• Directive 2008/50 -N3SBPT1LB : paragraph 40
• Directive 2008/50 -N3SBPT1LF : paragraphs 38, 39, 62
• Directive 2008/50 -N3SC : paragraphs 15, 61
• Directive 2008/50 -N3SD : paragraphs 16, 51
• Directive 2008/50 -N5 : paragraphs 41, 43
• Directive 2008/50 -N5SA : paragraph 17
• Directive 2008/50 -N11 : paragraphs 29, 48, 57, 58, 66, 68
• Directive 2008/50 -N11SB : paragraph 18
• Directive 2008/50 -N14SA : paragraph 64
• Directive 2008/50 -N15SA : paragraph 19
• Directive 2008/50 -N15SAPT1 : paragraph 65
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/95 -N56 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/95 -N59 : paragraph 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/00 -N59 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/07 -N35 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/07 -N37 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/07 -N38 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/07 -N39 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/07 -N42 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/07 -N46 : paragraph 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -404/13 : paragraph 25
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -404/13 -N25 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -404/13 -N40 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -404/13 -N52 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -404/13 -N55 : paragraphs 32, 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -404/13 -N56 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -404/13 -N58 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -440/13 -N40 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/14 -N52 : paragraph 54
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/16 -N59 : paragraph 54
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/16 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/16 -N31 : paragraph 54
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -572/16 -N42 : paragraph 54
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -723/17 : paragraphs 33, 59
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/17 -N22 : paragraph 60

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 288 -P3
• Interprets : TEU, Article 4 -P3
• Interprets : TEU, Article 19 -P1L2
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -A06
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -A07
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -A13P1
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -A23P1
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -N3SBPT1LA
• Interprets : Directive 2008/50 -N11

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 2 -P1 : point 53
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 37 : point 53
  
• TFEU, Article 191 -P2 : point 53
  
• TFEU, Article 288 -P3 : point 13
  
• TFEU, Article 290 -P1 : point 70
  
• TFEU, Article 291 -P2 : point 70
  
• TEU, Article 3 -P3 : point 53
  
• TEU, Article 4 -P3 : point 13
  
• TEU, Article 17 -P1SNT2 : point 24
  
• TEU, Article 17 -P1SNT3 : point 24
  
• TEU, Article 19 -P1L2 : point 13
  
• Directive 92/43 -A06P3 : point 58
  
• Directive 92/43 -A06P4 : point 58
  
• Directive 2006/24 : point 47
  
• Directive 2008/50 : points 2, 11, 16, 21, 22, 24, 29, 37, 38, 53, 54, 56, 60, 69, 71
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A01 : point 55
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A01PT1 : points 3, 84
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A02PT25 : points 4, 31
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A02PT26 : points 4, 31
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A05 : point 30
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A06 : points 5, 13
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A06P2 : point 31
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A06P2SNT2 : point 62
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A06P3 : point 31
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A06P4 : point 31
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A07 : points 13, 68, 86, 87
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A07P1 : points 6, 26, 27, 80
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A07P2 : point 7
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A13 : point 84
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A13P1 : points 8, 13, 68, 72, 83, 86, 87
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A13P1SNT1 : points 73, 76, 77
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A13P1SNT2 : points 75, 76, 77
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A13P1SNT3 : point 77
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A23 : point 17
  
• Directive 2008/50 -A23P1 : points 9, 13, 68, 86, 87
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N1PARTBT4 : point 82
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N2PARTB : point 30
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N3 : points 6, 77
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N3PARTAPT1 : point 78
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N3PARTAPT2 : point 78
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N3PARTBPT1 : point 10
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N3PARTBPT1LA : points 13, 67, 87
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N3PARTBPT1LAT1 : points 26, 80
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N3PARTBPT1LAT2 : point 80
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N3PARTBPT1LB : point 27
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N5 : point 7
  
• Directive 2008/50 -N11 : points 13, 68, 73, 75, 84, 86, 87
  
• Decision 2011/850 : point 70
  
• Decision 2011/850 -A10 : point 69
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52005PC0447 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/74 -N6 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -33/76 -N5 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/81 -N25 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/90 -N14 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/95 -N56 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -120/97 -N35 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -120/97 -N36 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/02 -N66 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/03 -N76 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/03 -N77 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -326/05 -N75 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -326/05 -N76 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -326/05 -N77 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/05 -N40 : point 18
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/05 -N41 : point 18
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -55/06 -N164 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -55/06 -N165 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -55/06 -N166 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -55/06 -N167 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -55/06 -N168 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -55/06 -N169 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/06 -N69 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/07 -N46 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/08 -N60 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/08 -N61 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -425/08 -N47 : points 44, 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -425/08 -N62 : points 44, 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -77/09 -N55 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/09 -N100 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/09 -N101 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/09 -N102 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/09 -N103 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/10 -N60 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/11 -N75 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N25 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -258/11 -N44 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/12 -N35 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/12 -N36 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -293/12 -N47 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -293/12 -N48 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -350/12 -N63 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -427/12 -N38 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -65/13 -N44 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -65/13 -N45 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/14 -N48 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -88/14 -N29 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -286/14 -N30 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/14 -N78 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -488/15 -N2 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -488/15 -N3 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -488/15 -N96 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -243/15 -N44 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/15 -N50 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/15 -N46 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -664/15 -N46 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -664/15 -N48 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/16 -N53 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/16 -N46 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/16 -N49 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -572/16 -N42 : point 38
  
• General Court - Judgment T -339/16 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/17 -N28 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -223/17 -N38 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/17 -N51 : point 18
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/17 -N114 : point 58
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 29/12/2017

Date of the Opinion

• 28/02/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

26/06/2019

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 280 from 19.08.2019, p.4

Application: OJ C 104 from 19.03.2018, p.16

Name of the parties

Craeynest and Others

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Berkemann, Jörg: Messergebnisse nach Maßgabe der Luftqualitätsrichtlinie 2008/50/EG, Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 2019 p.1056-1062 (DE)
2. A., I.: Soudní dvůr EU : Posuzování kvality ovzduší, Právní rozhledy : časopis pro všechna právní odvětví 2019 p.609-610 (CS)
3. Bonneville, Philippe ; Gänser, Christian ; Markarian, Sophie: Environnement - Qualité de l'air et de l'eau, L'actualité juridique ; droit administratif 2019 N°39 p.2291-2292 (FR)
4. Moliner-Dubost, Marianne: Directive Air pur pour l'Europe : précisions de la CJUE sur les modalités d'évaluation de la qualité de l'air, Énergie - Environnement - Infrastructures 2019 nº 8-9 p.52-53 (FR)
5. Misonne, Delphine: Commentaire à l'arrêt de la CJUE du 26 juin 2019, affaire C-723/17, Aménagement - Environnement 2019 N° 4 p.254-255 (FR)
6. Duţu-Buzura, Mircea: Rolul contenciosului judiciar în prevenirea şi combaterea poluării aerului : contribuţia jurisprudenţei Curţii de Justiţie a Uniunii Europene, Dreptul 2019 nº 12 p. 166-178 (RO)
7. De Sadeleer, Nicolas: Intensité du contrôle juridictionnel assuré par les juridictions nationales concernant l’évaluation de la qualité de l’air : commentaire de l’arrêt Craeynest, Revue européenne de droit de la consommation 2020 p.345-351 (FR)
8. Pedrosa, Kendro: The Decentralised Enforcement of the Provisions on Measurement and Assessment of Air Quality under Directive 2008/50/EC : comment on cjeu Case C-723/17 of 26 June 2019, Craeynest, Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 2020 Vol. 17/2 p. 247-261 (EN)
9. Fleurke, Floor M.: Aanscherping van rechtsbescherming en handhaving in milieuzaken : het recht op schone lucht : HvJ 26 juni 2019, zaak C-723/17, (Lies Craeynest e.a./Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest en Brussels Instituut voor Milieubeheer), HvJ 19 december 2019, zaak C-752/18, (Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV/Freistaat Bayern), Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2020 p. 225-232 (NL)
10. Coutron, Laurent: À propos du droit à l'exécution des décisions des juridictions nationales : une construction à parfaire, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2020, n° 2, p. 279-285 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel - Belgium

Subject-matter

• Environment
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Bonichot

Advocate General

Kokott

Language(s) of the Case

• Dutch
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• German