Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 107 : paragraph 74
• TFEU, Article 107 -P1 : paragraphs 19, 26, 30, 31, 43, 45, 46, 50, 71, 75, 78
• TFEU, Article 345 : paragraph 39
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A61L1 : paragraph 77
• Decision 2014/884 : paragraph 1
• Decision 2014/884 -PT56 : paragraph 24
• Decision 2014/884 -PT57 : paragraph 24
• Decision 2014/884 -PT58 : paragraph 24
• Decision 2014/884 -PT59 : paragraph 24
• Decision 2014/884 -PT60 : paragraph 24
• Decision 2014/884 -PT61 : paragraph 24
• Decision 2014/884 -PT62 : paragraph 24
• Commission - Other Acts - 52009XC0326(01) : paragraph 23
• Commission - Other Acts - 52011XC1206(02) : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -278/92 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -278/92 -N22 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/99 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/99 -N138 : paragraphs 56, 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/99 -N140 : paragraphs 56, 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -75/05 -N66 : paragraph 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/08 -N40 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 : paragraphs 64, 71
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N100 : paragraph 72
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N103 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N104 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N78 : paragraph 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N79 : paragraph 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N81 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N91 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N92 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N93 : paragraph 48
• General Court - Judgment T -29/10 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/11 : paragraphs 64, 71
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/12 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/12 -N51 : paragraph 72
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/12 -N52 : paragraph 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/12 -N55 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/12 -N56 : paragraphs 56, 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/12 -N61 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/12 : paragraphs 40, 41, 64 - 66, 68, 69
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/12 -N32 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/12 -N33 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/12 -N34 : paragraph 49
• General Court - Judgment T -386/14 : paragraphs 1 - 83
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/15 -N53 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/16 -N65 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -150/16 -N13 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -300/16 -N21 : paragraph 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -300/16 -N22 : paragraph 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -300/16 -N23 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -300/16 -N24 : paragraph 47

Operative part

• Annuls : General Court - Judgment T -386/14

Opinion

• Directive 2014/59 : point 5
  
• Decision 2014/884 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/84 -N14 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -340/85 -N13 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/88 -N20 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -278/92 -N22 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/94 -N58 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/94 -N60 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/97 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -334/99 -N64 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/99 : point 4
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N74 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N75 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -276/02 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/08 -N40 : point 31
  
• General Court - Judgment T -268/08 -N152 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N103 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N79 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N91 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N92 : point 40
  
• General Court - Judgment T -29/10 -N125 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -73/11 -N55 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/11 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/12 : point 4
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/12 : point 4
  
• General Court - Judgment T -386/14 : points 1 - 89
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 16/11/2016

Date of the Opinion

• 28/11/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

06/03/2018

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 161 from 07.05.2018, p.10

Application: OJ C 14 from 16.01.2017, p.28

Name of the parties

Commission v FIH Holding and FIH Erhversbank

Notes on Academic Writings

1. van Lambalgen, R.E.: Het FIH-arrest : over de toepassing van het "Market Economy Operator Principle", Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2018 p.111-113 (NL)
2. Cyndecka, Małgorzata Agnieszka: The MEOP in the FIH case - Where law and economics meet, but law prevails, European State Aid Law Quarterly 2018 Vol.17, N°4 p.546-552 (EN)
3. Idot, Laurence: Aides d'État - Opérateur privé en économie de marché, Europe 2018, Mai nº 5, Comm. 195 (FR)
4. Billard, Olivier ; Benedetti, Julie: Quelle place pour les considérations économiques dans l'appréciation de l'existence d'un avantage?: réflexions sur la jurisprudence récente de la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne : commentaire sous les arrêts FIH (C-579/16 P), FC Barcelona/Commission (T-865/16) et Real Madrid/Commission (T-791/16), Revue des affaires européennes 2019 p.209-218 (FR)
5. Lo Schiavo, Gianni: Examining the nature of the market economic operator test (MEO) under Article 107 TFEU: FIH Holding and FIH Erhversbank, European Law Review 2020, vol. 45, n. 4, p. 540-552 (EN)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• - State aid
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
  
• Appeals : application granted
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Arabadjiev

Advocate General

Szpunar

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English