Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 50 : paragraphs 1, 17, 19, 20, 22, 24 - 26, 37 - 40, 45, 46
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : paragraph 26
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P1 : paragraph 41
• Directive 2003/6 -A02 : paragraph 26
• Directive 2003/6 -A02P1 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2003/6 -A03 : paragraphs 5, 26
• Directive 2003/6 -A14P1 : paragraphs 6, 19, 24 - 27, 29, 30, 35, 36, 44, 46
• Directive 2014/57 : paragraphs 1, 22
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -45/08 -N42 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N34 : paragraph 20
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N36 : paragraph 20
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -213/13 -N58 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -213/13 -N59 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -69/14 -N28 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -69/14 -N29 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/14 -N55 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/14 -N56 : paragraph 41

Operative part

• Interprets : Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 50
• Interprets : Directive 2003/6 -A14P1

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 50 : points 4, 35, 37, 40, 42, 45 - 47, 49, 51 - 53, 57, 58, 63, 64, 67, 71 - 81, 88
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : point 43
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 : point 5
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P1 : points 81, 82, 84, 85
  
• Directive 2003/6 : points 2, 6, 42, 44, 45 - 47
  
• Directive 2003/6 -A02 : point 9
  
• Directive 2003/6 -A03 : point 9
  
• Directive 2003/6 -A14P1 : points 10, 71, 79
  
• Directive 2003/6 -C02P1 : point 8
  
• Directive 2003/6 -C38 : point 7
  
• Directive 2014/57 : points 2, 41, 47 - 49, 76, 77
  
• Directive 2014/57 -A03 : point 19
  
• Directive 2014/57 -A04P1 : point 20
  
• Directive 2014/57 -A07 : point 21
  
• Directive 2014/57 -A07P1 : point 79
  
• Directive 2014/57 -C22 : point 18
  
• Directive 2014/57 -C23 : point 18
  
• Directive 2014/57 -C27 : point 18
  
• Regulation 569/2014 -A08 : point 15
  
• Regulation 569/2014 -A10 : point 16
  
• Regulation 569/2014 -A14 : point 14
  
• Regulation 569/2014 -A30 : point 17
  
• Regulation 569/2014 -C71 : point 11
  
• Regulation 569/2014 -C72 : point 12
  
• Regulation 569/2014 -C77 : point 13
  
• Regulation 596/2014 : points 2, 47, 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/04 -N22 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -2/08 -N22 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -2/08 -N23 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -489/10 -N37 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 : points 37, 77, 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N18 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N19 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N20 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N21 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N22 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N35 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -213/13 -N59 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -69/14 -N28 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -69/14 -N29 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/14 -N55 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/14 -N56 : point 82
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -505/14 -N38 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -505/14 -N40 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -497/14 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -524/15 : points 1, 58, 62, 73, 81
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -537/16 : points 47, 81
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 23/11/2016

Date of the Opinion

• 12/09/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

20/03/2018

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 166 from 14.05.2018, p.15

Application: OJ C 63 from 27.02.2017, p.14

Name of the parties

Di Puma

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Pelletier, Marc: La CJUE et le principe non bis in idem: un pas en arrière, deux pas en avant, Revue de droit fiscal 2018 n°14 p. 2-4 (FR)
2. Consulich, Federico: Il prisma del ne bis in idem nelle mani del Giudice eurounitario, Diritto penale e processo : mensile di giurisprudenza, legislazione e dottrina 2018 p.949-959 (IT)
3. Van Eyndhoven, J.: Hof van Justitie aanvaardt beperking van het ne-bis-in-idembeginsel op vlak van het bis-criterium, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2018 p.340-344 (NL)
4. Vandermeeren, Roland: Cumul des répressions pénale et administrative : de nouvelles précisions à la lumière de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne, Revue de jurisprudence de droit des affaires 2018 nº 10 p.821-824 (FR)
5. Lo Schiavo, Gianni: The principle of ne bis in idem and the application of criminal sanctions: of scope and restrictions, European Constitutional Law Review 2018 Vol. 14 nº 3 p.644-663 (EN)
6. Bijnens, Daan: Het ne-bis-in-idembeginsel in het Unierecht scherp gesteld, Tijdschrift voor bestuurswetenschappen en publiekrecht 2018 N°8 p.493-494 (NL)
7. Matsopoulou, Haritini: L'application de la règle ne bis in idem par la CJUE, Revue des sociétés 2018 N°12 p.731-736 (FR)
8. Błachnio-Parzych, Anna: Zasada ne bis in idem a obowiązek ustanowienia sankcji skutecznych, proporcjonalnych i odstraszających, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2018 Vol. 12 (159) p.37-42 (PL)
9. Stacca, Serena: Il ne bis in idem e la difficoltà di dialogo tra ordinamento europeo e ordinamento interno, Giornale di diritto amministrativo 2018 N°6 p.748-756 (IT)
10. Simon, Denys: Droits fondamentaux - Ne bis in idem, Europe 2018, Mai nº 5, Comm. 169 (FR)
11. Barkhuysen, T. ; Van Emmerik, M.L.: Handel met voorwetenschap, Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2019 nº10 p.638-645 (NL)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Corte suprema di cassazione - Italy

Subject-matter

• Fundamental rights
  
• - Charter of Fundamental Rights
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  
• Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

von Danwitz

Advocate General

Campos Sánchez-Bordona

Language(s) of the Case

• Italian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• Spanish