CURIA - Case information

Home > Search form > List of results > Case information

Start printing

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 October 2020

BY and CZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 1999/62/EC – Directive 2006/38/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Article 7(9) – Article 7a(1) and (2) – Tolls – Principle of the recovery of infrastructure costs – Infrastructure costs – Operating costs – Costs related to traffic police – Cost overrun – Direct effect – Ex post justification of an excessive toll rate – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment

Case C-321/19

Documents in the Case

Document

Date

Name of the parties

Subject-matter

Curia

EUR-Lex

Judgment (OJ)

27/11/2020

Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Détermination des taux des péages pour l'utilisation d'autoroutes)

Taxation

Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2020:866

28/10/2020

Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Détermination des taux des péages pour l'utilisation d'autoroutes)

Taxation

Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2020:480

18/06/2020

Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Détermination des taux des péages pour l'utilisation d'autoroutes)

Taxation

Application (OJ)

14/06/2019

Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Détermination des taux des péages pour l'utilisation d'autoroutes)

Taxation

Request for a preliminary ruling

18/04/2019

Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Détermination des taux des péages pour l'utilisation d'autoroutes)

Taxation

Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.07 Transport
    4.07.03 Road transport
      4.07.03.054

07 null
07.03 null
07.03.054

07 null
07.03 null
07.03.053

04 null
04.03 null
04.03.01

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph N
5431993L0089 -A07LH : paragraphs 37 - 39
4831999L0062 : paragraphs 28, 47
5031999L0062 -A02 : paragraph N
331999L0062 -A02LA : paragraph N
4231999L0062 -A07 : paragraph N
431999L0062 -A07BISP1 : paragraphs 1, 5, 13, 18, 21, 34, 40, 45, 46
5131999L0062 -A07BISP2 : paragraphs 1, 5, 13, 18, 21, 34, 40, 45, 46
5131999L0062 -A07BISP3 : paragraph 5
2531999L0062 -A07NONIESP2 : paragraph N
5231999L0062 -A07P1 : paragraph N
4231999L0062 -A07P9 : paragraphs 1, 13 - 16, 19, 21, 22, 27, 29, 30, 32 - 34, 37, 39, 41 - 46, 51, 52
5831999L0062 -A07P9SNT1 : paragraphs 20, 31
4031999L0062 -A07P9SNT2 : paragraphs 18, 20
2431999L0062 -A07P9SNT3 : paragraph N
2031999L0062 -N3PT3 : paragraph 6
2532006L0038 : paragraph 14
4352003PC0448 : paragraph N
2861998CJ0205 -N138 : paragraphs 17, 18, 47, 48
5062002CJ0157 : paragraph 14
4362002CJ0157 -N42 : paragraph N
3762008CJ0194 -N45 : paragraph N
3662017CJ0713 -N37 : paragraph N
3562017CJ0724 -N55 : paragraph N
5462017CJ0724 -N56 : paragraph N
5562017CJ0724 -N57 : paragraph N
5662019CC0321 : paragraphs 23, 26, 43, 58

Operative part

Interprets : Directive 1999/62 -A07P9
Interprets : Directive 1999/62 -A07BISP1
Interprets : Directive 1999/62 -A07BP2
Interprets : Directive 1999/62
Interprets : Court of Justice - Judgment C -205/98 -N138

Opinion

TFEU, Article 260 -P1 : points 90, 91
Directive 93/89 : point 3
Directive 93/89 -A07LH : points 56, 79, 80, 88
Directive 1999/62 : points 23, 25, 38, 39, 42, 45, 47, 48, 86, 90, 91
Directive 1999/62 -A02 : points 6, 82
Directive 1999/62 -A02LABIS : points 30, 68
Directive 1999/62 -A02LABIST2PT2L3 : point 52
Directive 1999/62 -A02LB : point 26
Directive 1999/62 -A02LBBIS : point 26
Directive 1999/62 -A02LBTER : point 53
Directive 1999/62 -A07BIS : point 9
Directive 1999/62 -A07BISP1 : points 5, 15, 20, 35, 74, 89, 92, 94, 103
Directive 1999/62 -A07BISP2 : points 5, 15, 20, 74, 89, 92, 94, 103
Directive 1999/62 -A07BISP3 : point 33
Directive 1999/62 -A07P1 : points 7, 35
Directive 1999/62 -A07P9 : points 3 - 5, 7, 15 - 18, 22, 24, 26, 27, 29, 33, 35, 36, 43, 50, 55, 57 - 60, 64, 69, 71 - 74, 77, 79, 83 - 85, 89, 92, 94, 99, 103
Directive 1999/62 -A07P9SNT1 : point 63
Directive 1999/62 -A07P9SNT2 : points 20, 46, 81
Directive 1999/62 -A07P9SNT3 : point 68
Directive 1999/62 -A07P10 : point 7
Directive 1999/62 -A07P10LAT3 : point 35
Directive 1999/62 -A07P11 : point 8
Directive 1999/62 -A07P11LBT2 : point 35
Directive 1999/62 -A11L3 : point 49
Directive 1999/62 -N3 : point 83
Directive 1999/62 -N3PT2.1 : point 10
Directive 1999/62 -N3PT3 : points 10, 33, 51
Directive 1999/62 -N3PT4 : point 10
Directive 1999/62 -N3PT4T1 : point 93
Directive 1999/62 -N3PT4T3 : point 93
Directive 2006/38 : points 38, 43
Directive 2006/38 -A02P1SNT1 : point 76
Directive 2006/38 -C18 : point 49
Directive 2006/38 -C19 : point 49
Council - Common Position - 52005AG0033 : point 45
Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/76 -N24 : point 78
Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/90 -N11 : point 75
Court of Justice - Judgment C -91/92 -N17 : point 77
Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/95 -N59 : point 78
Court of Justice - Judgment C -205/98 -N91 : point 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -205/98 -N92 : point 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -205/98 -N138 : points 19, 86, 93
Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/00 -N25 : point 75
Court of Justice - Judgment C -157/02 -N41 : point 16
Court of Justice - Judgment C -157/02 -N42 : point 16
Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/03 -N55 : point 54
Court of Justice - Judgment C -363/05 -N61 : point 83
Court of Justice - Judgment C -194/08 -N51 : point 77
Court of Justice - Judgment C -282/10 -N35 : point 77
Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N25 : point 78
Court of Justice - Order C -477/11 -N52 : point 54
Court of Justice - Judgment C -17/17 -N43 : point 77
Court of Justice - Judgment C -17/17 -N44 : point 77
Court of Justice - Judgment C -17/17 -N45 : point 77
Court of Justice - Judgment C -17/17 -N46 : point 77
Court of Justice - Judgment C -384/17 -N47 : point 75
Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/17 -N38 : point 75
Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N48 : point 25
Court of Justice - Judgment C -723/17 -N45 : point 78
Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/18 -N34 : point 25
Court of Justice - Judgment C -274/18 -N61 : point 96
Court of Justice - Judgment C -274/18 -N62 : points 96, 97

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

18/04/2019

Date of the Opinion

18/06/2020

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

28/10/2020

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Détermination des taux des péages pour l'utilisation d'autoroutes)

Notes on Academic Writings

Bassani, Vincent: Transports - Péages, Europe 2020, n° 12 Décembre, Comm. 393 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen - Germany

Subject-matter

Taxation
Transport

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Silva de Lapuerta

Advocate General

Saugmandsgaard Øe

Language(s) of the Case

German

Language(s) of the Opinion

French