Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 October 2015

Thomas Cook Belgium NV v Thurner Hotel GmbH

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 — European order for payment procedure — Late statement of opposition — Article 20(2) — Application for review of the European order for payment — Objection to the jurisdiction of the court of origin — European order for payment wrongly issued having regard to the requirements laid down in the regulation — Not ‘clearly’ wrongly issued — No ‘exceptional’ circumstances

Case C-245/14


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
27/11/2015 Thomas Cook Belgium
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2015:715
22/10/2015 Thomas Cook Belgium
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2015:715
22/10/2015 Thomas Cook Belgium
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2015:442
02/07/2015 Thomas Cook Belgium
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
22/08/2014 Thomas Cook Belgium
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.07 European order for payment procedure
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.07 European order for payment procedure


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 21/05/2014

Date of the Opinion

  • 02/07/2015

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

22/10/2015


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 414 from 14.12.2015, p.5

Application: OJ C 303 from 08.09.2014, p.10

Name of the parties

Thomas Cook Belgium

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Idot, Laurence: Clause attributive de juridiction, opposition et réexamen, Europe 2015 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.51 (FR)
  2. Strikwerda, L.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2016 Afl.22 p.2991-2993 (NL)
  3. Nourissat, Cyril: Nouveau refus de la Cour de justice de caractériser des circonstances exceptionnelles en matière de réexamen, Procédures 2016 nº 1 p.29 (FR)
  4. Gruber, Peter: Die Nichtigerklärung eines europäischen Zahlungsbefehls, Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht 2016 p.152-155 (DE)
  5. Von Hein, Jan: Überprüfung eines Europäischen Zahlungsbefehls - Zuständigkeit des Erlassgerichts, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft 2016 p.58-59 (DE)
  6. Deshayes, Béatrice: Falschangaben im Antrag auf EU-Zahlungsbefehl – kein Recht zur Überprüfung, IWRZ – Zeitschrift für internationales Wirtschaftsrecht 2016 p.32 (DE)
  7. Roth, Herbert: Regel und Ausnahme bei der Überprüfung des Europäischen Zahlungsbefehls nach Art. 20 Abs. 2 EuMahnVO, Value Added Tax and Duties Tribunals Reports 2017 p.63-64 (DE)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Handelsgericht Wien - Austria

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

quatrième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Bay Larsen

Advocate General

Cruz Villalón

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • Spanish