Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2019

BMB sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office

Appeal — Community design — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Article 25(1)(e) — Invalidity proceedings — Design representing comfit boxes for sweets — Declaration of invalidity

Case C-693/17 P



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
05/04/2019 BMB v EUIPO
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2019:176
06/03/2019 BMB v EUIPO
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:C:2019:176
06/03/2019 BMB v EUIPO
Application (OJ)
06/04/2018 BMB v EUIPO
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.063
10 null
  10.06


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 10/12/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

06/03/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 148 from 29.04.2019, p.5

Application: OJ C 142 from 23.04.2018, p.20

Name of the parties

BMB v EUIPO

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Designs

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment
  • Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  • Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

dixième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Lycourgos

Advocate General

Tanchev

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available