Reports of Cases

1994 I-01477

Swedish XV/I-00089 Finnish XV/I-00121

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• General Court - Judgment T -16/91 : paragraph 18
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 177 : paragraphs 20 - 24
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 37 : paragraphs 20, 25 - 33
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 85 : paragraphs 20, 25, 26, 30, 33 - 39
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 86 : paragraphs 20, 25, 26, 33, 40 - 45
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 90 -P2 : paragraphs 20, 26, 33, 46 - 50
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/65 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/86 -N7 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/85 -N9 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -24/92 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -102/81 -N14 : paragraph 22
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 5 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -155/73 -N10 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/90 -N33 : paragraph 27
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 30 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/64 : paragraph 28
• Regulation 2658/87 -2716 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87 -N13 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87 -N18 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -260/89 : paragraph 33
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 90 -P1 : paragraph 33
• Decision 91/50 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -23/67 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87 -N22 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/76 -N89 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/86 -N149 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/91 -N14 : paragraph 46

Operative part

• Interprets : EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 177
• Interprets : EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 85
• Interprets : EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 86
• Interprets : EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 90 -P2

Opinion

• EC Treaty (Maastricht), Article 3 -LT : points 7, 61
  
• EC Treaty (Maastricht), Article 129B : point 7
  
• Directive 90/377 : point 8
  
• Directive 90/547 : points 8, 90
  
• Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 51988DC0238 : point 9
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 8A : point 9
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 90 -P3 : points 9, 126
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 100A : point 9
  
• General Court - Judgment T -16/91 -N4 : point 12
  
• Decision 91/50 : points 22, 27, 47, 71, 72, 87, 91, 96, 99, 105, 139, 154
  
• General Court - Judgment T -16/91 : point 23
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 177 : points 29 - 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/65 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/86 -N7 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/85 -N9 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -102/81 -N13 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -109/88 -N8 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -102/81 -N14 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -246/80 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -43/82 -N40 : point 39
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 5 -L2 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -229/83 -N14 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -24/92 -N19 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/87 -N25 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/87 -N36 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/87 -N22 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/87 -N19 : point 42
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 3 -LF : point 42
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 85 : points 42, 78 - 108
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 86 : points 42, 109 - 122
  
• Regulation 17/62 : point 42
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 37 : points 55 - 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -155/73 -N10 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -271/81 -N8 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/90 -N33 : point 57
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 60 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/64 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/88 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87 -N13 : points 69, 70
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -30/87 -N41 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87 -N14 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87 -N15 : point 75
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 42 : point 80
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 87 -P2LC : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/84 -N40 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -45/85 -N12 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -136/86 -N18 : point 81
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 90 : points 82, 132
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 85 -P1 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87 -N18 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 -N14 : points 86, 104
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -23/67 : point 104
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -322/81 -N23 : point 105
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/84 -N22 : point 106
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 85 -P3 : point 108
  
• Regulation 1983/83 -A03LC : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -260/89 -N31 : point 111
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 86 -L1 : point 114
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87 -N35 : point 115
  
• General Court - Judgment T -68/89 -N357 : point 116
  
• General Court - Judgment T -68/89 -N358 : point 116
  
• General Court - Judgment T -65/89 -N68 : point 120
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/76 -N89 : point 120
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/86 -N149 : point 120
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 90 -P2 : points 123 - 170
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -10/71 : point 125
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -10/71 -N16 : point 126
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/83 -N30 : point 126
  
• Decision 90/16 -N16 : point 126
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/90 : point 126
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/73 -N19 : points 127, 137
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/90 -N27 : point 127
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/86 : point 128
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/86 -N56 : point 128
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/86 -N57 : point 128
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -260/89 -N34 : point 129
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/91 : point 130
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/91 -N17 : points 131, 145
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/91 -N19 : points 131, 148
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/88 -N55 : point 133
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -271/90 -N24 : point 133
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/91 -N14 : points 133, 144
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -179/90 -N27 : point 137
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/83 -N28 : point 138
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -18/88 -N16 : point 138
  
• Decision 93/126 : point 140
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -260/89 -N33 : point 143
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -155/73 -N15 : point 143
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/84 -N17 : point 143
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/90 -N24 : point 143
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/83 -N19 : point 144
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/91 -N16 : point 145
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/91 -N18 : point 147
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -18/88 -N22 : point 151
  
• Written Parliamentary question - 91993E000827 : point 161
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 10/11/1992

Date of the Opinion

• 08/02/1994

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

27/04/1994

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 326 from 11.12.1992, p.10

Judgment: OJ C 161 from 11.06.1994, p.2

Name of the parties

Gemeente Almelo and Others v Energiebedrijf IJsselmij

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Derenne, Jacques: Journal des tribunaux / droit européen 1994 p.116-117 (FR)
2. Idot, Laurence: Europe 1994 Juin Comm. nº 243 p.13-15 (FR)
3. Simon, Denys: Europe 1994 Juin Comm. nº 223 p.8 + nº 230 p.11 (FR)
4. Kovar, Robert: La Cour de justice et les entreprises chargées de la gestion d'un service d'intérêt économique général. Un pas dans le bon sens vers une dérégulation réglée, Europe Europe 1994, n° 6 Juillet, p. 1-5 ; n° 6 Août-Septembre, p. 1-3 (FR)
5. Ebel, Hans-Rudolf: Europäisches Wirtschafts- & Steuerrecht - EWS 1994 p.241-243 (DE)
6. Rapp-Jung, Barbara: Der Energiesektor zwischen Marktwirtschaft und öffentlicher Aufgabe, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 1994 p.464-466 (DE)
7. Hamon, Francis: L'actualité juridique ; droit administratif 1994 p.639-643 (FR)
8. Van den Bossche, A.M.: Rechtskundig weekblad 1994-95 p.337-338 (NL)
9. Taylor, Simon M.: Article 90 and Telecommunications Monopolies, European Competition Law Review 1994 p.322-334 (EN)
10. Jiménez-Blanco Carrillo de Albornoz, Antonio: Servicio público, interés general, monopolio: recientes aportes del Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Europea (1993-1994), Revista española de Derecho Administrativo 1994 p.589-602 (ES)
11. Fumagalli, Luigi: Conferme giurisprudenziali in tema di procedura pregiudiziale, Diritto comunitario e degli scambi internazionali 1994 p.707-717 (IT)
12. Cath, I.G.F.: Importverbod elektriciteit, Euridica 1994 nº 5 p.24-26 (NL)
13. Dutheil de la Rochère, Jacqueline: Recueil Dalloz Sirey 1995 Jur. p.18-20 (FR)
14. Gavalda, Christian: Les petites affiches 1995 nº 17 p.15 (FR)
15. Hancher, Leigh: Common Market Law Review 1995 p.305-325 (EN)
16. Raymundie, Olivier: Les petites affiches 1995 nº 32 p.6-10 (FR)
17. Vasques, Luciano: Il Foro italiano 1995 IV Col.45-49 (IT)
18. Simon, Denys: Chronique de jurisprudence du Tribunal et de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes. Institutions et ordre juridique communautaire, Journal du droit international 1995 p.427-429 (FR)
19. Gilliams, H.M.: S.E.W. ; Sociaal-economische wetgeving 1995 p.529-538 (NL)
20. Fouchard, Philippe: Revue de l'arbitrage 1995 p.505-511 (FR)
21. Ktistaki, Stavroula: Dikaio antagonismou kai dimosia ypiresia sta plaisia tis evropaïkis oloklirosis, Elliniki Dikaiosyni 1995 p.1479-1495 (EL)
22. Papantoniadou, Sofia: Elliniki Epitheorisi Evropaïkou Dikaiou 1995 p.450-455 (EL)
23. Retterer, Stéphane: Régime communautaire de l'entreprise, Revue trimestrielle de droit commercial et de droit économique 1996 p.403-408 (FR)
24. Nori, Glauco: La nuova disciplina dell'arbitrato nell'ordinamento comunitario, Giustizia civile 1996 I p.3073-3096 (IT)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Gerechtshof Arnhem - Netherlands

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
  
• - Concerted practices
  
• - Dominant position
  
• Free movement of goods
  
• - Quantitative restrictions
  
• - State monopolies of a commercial character
  
• Environment
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Cour plénière (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Schockweiler

Advocate General

Darmon

Language(s) of the Case

• Dutch
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French