Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Agreement with Third Countries or International Bodies - 21994A1223(17) : paragraph 45
• Agreement with Third Countries or International Bodies - 21994A1223(17) -A01P1 : paragraphs 4, 46, 47
• Agreement with Third Countries or International Bodies - 21994A1223(17) -A50P7 : paragraphs 5, 46
• Agreement with Third Countries or International Bodies - 21994A1223(17) -PRL1 : paragraphs 3, 47
• Directive 2004/48 : paragraphs 45, 48
• Directive 2004/48 -A01 : paragraph 7
• Directive 2004/48 -A02P3 : paragraph 8
• Directive 2004/48 -A03 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/48 -A03P2 : paragraph 67
• Directive 2004/48 -A04 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/48 -A05 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/48 -A06 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/48 -A07 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/48 -A08 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/48 -A09 : paragraphs 9, 10, 61, 65, 68
• Directive 2004/48 -A09P7 : paragraphs 1, 32 - 39, 41, 44, 46, 50, 58 - 60, 63, 64, 66, 70, 71
• Directive 2004/48 -A10 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/48 -A11 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/48 -A12 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/48 -A13 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/48 -C4 : paragraph 6
• Directive 2004/48 -C5 : paragraph 6
• Directive 2004/48 -C7 : paragraphs 6, 43
• Directive 2004/48 -C8 : paragraphs 6, 43
• Directive 2004/48 -C10 : paragraphs 6, 42
• Directive 2004/48 -C22 : paragraphs 6, 37, 60, 61, 63
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -467/08 -N32 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/17 -N22 : paragraph 59

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2004/48 -A09P7

Opinion

Information not available

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 08/12/2017

Date of the Opinion

• 11/04/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

12/09/2019

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 383 from 11.11.2019, p.14

Application: OJ C 112 from 26.03.2018, p.12

Name of the parties

Bayer Pharma

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Sosnitza, Olaf: Vorrang der Marktordnung vor dem allgemeinen Irreführungsverbot, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht INT 2019 p.1273-1276 (DE)
2. De Haan, Tanguy: Note d’observations. Conséquences de l’européanisation des mesures provisoires et conservatoires en matière de droits intellectuels : la Cour de justice donne l’avantage au titulaire de droits, Revue de droit intellectuel : l'ingénieur-conseil 2019 p.500-511 (FR)
3. Dijkman, Léon: CJEU rules that repeal of provisional measure does not automatically create liability for wrongful enforcement, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 2019 p.917-918 (EN)
4. Lange, Daan F. de: Het Bayer/Richter-arrest : weinig richtig : noot, Berichten industriële eigendom 2020 p.59-62 (NL)
5. Lindemans, Jan-Diederik ; Bussé, Judith: Aansprakelijkheid voor het uitvoeren van voorlopige maatregelen in het kader van de handhaving van intellectuele rechten na de Bayer- en Snowfall-arresten : noot, Revue de droit commercial belge 2020 p. 356-365 (NL)
6. Sztoldman, Agnieszka: Compensation for a wrongful enforcement of a preliminary injunction under the Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) : Bayer Pharma AG v Richter Gedeon Vegyeszeti Gyar Nyrt. (C-688/17), European Intellectual Property Review 2020 p. 721-727 (EN)
7. De Haan, Tanguy: The CJEU sides with IP right holders : the Bayer Pharma judgment (C-688/17) and the consequences of the Europeanisation of provisional and precautionary measures relating to IP rights, European Intellectual Property Review 2020 p. 767-773 (EN)
8. Tilmann, Winfried: Erforderliche Änderung der patentrechtlichen Rechtsprechung zu § 945 ZPO im Bereich von Art. 9 VII der RL 2004/48/EG : C-688/17, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2021 p. 997-1007 (DE)
9. Tilmann, Winfried: Erforderliche Änderung der patentrechtlichen Rechtsprechung zu § 945 ZPO im Bereich von Art. 9 VII der RL 2004/48/EG : Rs. C-688/17, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2021 p. 997-1007 (DE)
10. Tilmann, Winfried: Consequences of the CJEU's Bayer v Richter decision : C-688/17, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 2022 p. 526-539 (EN)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Fővárosi Törvényszék - Hungary

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Malenovský

Advocate General

Pitruzzella

Language(s) of the Case

• Hungarian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French