Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 April 2019

Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission

Action for annulment — State aid — Measures implemented by Germany in favour of Frankfurt-Hahn Airport and airlines using that airport — Decision regarding the measures in favour of Frankfurt-Hahn Airport as State aid compatible with the internal market and finding no State aid in favour of airlines using that airport — Lack of individual concern — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility

Case T-492/15



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
17/05/2019 Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2019:252
12/04/2019 Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission
Abstract
ECLI:EU:T:2019:252
12/04/2019 Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission
Order
ECLI:EU:T:2018:434
06/07/2018 Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission
Order
ECLI:EU:T:2016:193
17/03/2016 Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission
Order
ECLI:EU:T:2016:126
26/02/2016 Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission
Application (OJ)
16/10/2015 Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
3 Legal proceedings
  3.08 Procedural rules
    3.08.04 Subject-matter, form of order sought and pleas in law
      3.08.04.01 Formal requirements
3 Legal proceedings
  3.08 Procedural rules
    3.08.02 Intervention
3 Legal proceedings
  3.08 Procedural rules
    3.08.04 Subject-matter, form of order sought and pleas in law
      3.08.04.01 Formal requirements
3 Legal proceedings
  3.08 Procedural rules
    3.08.05 Compliance with time-limits
3 Legal proceedings
  3.02 Actions for annulment
    3.02.03 Applications by natural or legal persons
      3.02.03.02 Acts which are of individual concern to them
3 Legal proceedings
  3.02 Actions for annulment
    3.02.03 Applications by natural or legal persons
      3.02.03.03 Acts which are of direct concern to them
3 Legal proceedings
  3.02 Actions for annulment
    3.02.03 Applications by natural or legal persons
      3.02.03.02 Acts which are of individual concern to them
3 Legal proceedings
  3.02 Actions for annulment
    3.02.03 Applications by natural or legal persons
      3.02.03.04 Regulatory acts
3 Legal proceedings
  3.02 Actions for annulment
    3.02.03 Applications by natural or legal persons
      3.02.03.03 Acts which are of direct concern to them
3 Legal proceedings
  3.02 Actions for annulment
    3.02.03 Applications by natural or legal persons
      3.02.03.04 Regulatory acts


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 26/08/2015

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

12/04/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 187 from 03.06.2019, p.59

Application: OJ C 363 from 03.11.2015, p.41

Name of the parties

Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Petzold, Hans Arno: Beihilferecht: Klage von Lufthansa gegen Beihilfen für den Flughafen Frankfurt-Hahn, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2019 p.502-512 (DE)
  2. Blanck, Kathrin: Beschwerde ausgesetzt – Verfahren zur Klärung der behaupteten unrechtmäßigen Beihilfegewährung für den Betrieb des Flughafens Hahn noch nicht abgeschlossen : Anmerkung, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2020 p. 203-205 (DE)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Competition
  • - State aid

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility

Formation of the Court

quatrième chambre élargie (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Calvo-Sotelo Ibáñez-Martín

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available