Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 12 July 2012

Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof

Competition — Article 102 TFEU — Concept of ‘undertaking’ — Data of the companies register stored in a database — Activity of collection and making available of that data in return for remuneration — Refusal by the public authorities to authorise re-utilisation of that data — ‘Sui generis’ right provided for in Article 7 of Directive 96/9/EC

Case C‑138/11


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
07/09/2012 Compass-Datenbank
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2012:449
12/07/2012 Compass-Datenbank
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2012:449
12/07/2012 Compass-Datenbank
Application (OJ)
10/06/2011 Compass-Datenbank
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2012:251
26/04/2012 Compass-Datenbank
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.08 Competition
    4.08.00 EU competition rules
      4.08.00.06 Definition of undertaking
        4.08.00.06.03
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.08 Competition
    4.08.00 EU competition rules
      4.08.00.06 Definition of undertaking
        4.08.00.06.01


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 21/03/2011

Date of the Opinion

  • 26/04/2012

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

12/07/2012


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 186 from 25.06.2011, p.12

Judgment: OJ C 287 from 22.09.2012, p.11

Name of the parties

Compass-Datenbank

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Mok, M.R.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2012 nº 564 (NL)
  2. Arhel, Pierre: Activité des juridictions de l'Union européenne en droit de la concurrence (juillet 2012), Petites affiches. La Loi / Le Quotidien juridique 2012 nº 201 p.7-8 (FR)
  3. Idot, Laurence: Champ d'application matériel, Europe 2012 Octobre Comm. nº 10 p.40 (FR)
  4. Robin, Catherine: Prérogative de puissance publique n'est pas activité économique en droit de la concurrence, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2013 nº 34 p.28 (FR)
  5. Van de Gronden, Johan: Mediaforum: Tijdschrift voor Media- en Communicatierecht 2013 p.355-356 (NL)
  6. Speyart, H.M.H. ; Belder, L.P.C.: Intellectuele eigendom & Reclamerecht 2013 p.59-60 (NL)
  7. Rijnen, C. ; Saanen, N.: Het veelkoppige monster, genaamd "onderneming", Tijdschrift voor Staatssteun 2013 p.52-59 (NL)
  8. Lundqvist, Björn: "Turning Government Data Into Gold": The Interface Between EU Competition Law and the Public Sector Information Directive - With Some Comments on the Compass Case, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2013 p.79-95 (EN)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Oberster Gerichtshof - Austria

Subject-matter

  • Competition
  • - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

Provisions of national law referred to

Firmenbuchgesetz (FBG), Paragraphen 1 bis 7, 10, und 33 bis 35 Verordnung des Bundesministers für Justiz über die Gebühren der Firmenbuchabfrage (Firmenbuchdatenbankverordnung), Paragraphen 4 Abs. 2 Bundesgesetz über besondere zivilrechtliche Vorschriften für Unternehmen (Unternehmensgesetzbuch - UGB), Paragraphen 9 und 10 Bundesgesetz über das Urheberrecht an Werken der Literatur und der Kunst und über verwandte Schutzrechte (Urheberrechtsgesetz), Paragraphen 76c ff Bundesgesetz über die Weiterverwendung von Informationen öffentlicher Stellen (Informationsweiterverwendungsgesetz – IWG)

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Lenaerts

Advocate General

Jääskinen

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • English