Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Failure to fulfil obligations - Infringement of Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(2) of Council Regulation No 1612/68 of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers (OJ, English special edition 1968(II), p. 475) - Access to education - Funding of studies abroad - Residence requirement - "3 out of 6" rule

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 21 : paragraph 62
• TFEU, Article 45 : paragraphs 37, 62, 68, 88, 89
• TFEU, Article 45 -P2 : paragraph 31
• TFEU, Article 165 : paragraph 71
• Directive 64/221 : paragraph 64
• Directive 68/360 : paragraph 64
• Regulation 1612/68 : paragraphs 61, 64, 67
• Regulation 1612/68 -A07 : paragraphs 2, 37
• Regulation 1612/68 -A07P2 : paragraphs 1, 32 - 36, 45, 46, 51 - 53, 55, 88, 89
• Regulation 1612/68 -A12 : paragraphs 3, 49 - 51
• Directive 72/194 : paragraph 64
• Directive 73/148 : paragraph 64
• Directive 75/34 : paragraph 64
• Directive 75/35 : paragraph 64
• Directive 90/364 : paragraph 64
• Directive 90/365 : paragraph 64
• Regulation 2434/92 : paragraph 1
• Directive 93/96 : paragraph 64
• Directive 2004/38 -A24 : paragraph 64
• Recommendation - 32006H0961 : paragraph 71
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/85 : paragraph 68
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -316/85 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/86 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -197/86 : paragraph 50
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -235/87 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -308/89 : paragraphs 36, 51
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/90 : paragraphs 34, 35, 48, 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -343/92 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/93 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/94 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/96 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/96 : paragraph 65
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/97 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -337/97 : paragraphs 35, 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -187/00 : paragraph 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -388/01 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -77/02 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/02 : paragraph 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/02 : paragraph 62
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/03 : paragraph 81
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/03 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/05 : paragraph 85
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -213/05 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/07 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/07 : paragraphs 37, 65
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/08 : paragraph 81
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/08 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -325/08 : paragraph 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -382/08 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -480/08 : paragraph 50
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -253/09 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/09 : paragraph 68
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -542/09 : paragraphs 53, 86
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -542/09 : paragraphs 52, 73, 78

Operative part

• Reference : TFEU, Article 45
• Reference : Regulation 1612/68 -A07P2

Opinion

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 39 : point 2
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 149 -P1 : point 4
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 149 -P2 : points 4, 137
  
• TFEU, Article 21 : point 25
  
• TFEU, Article 45 : points 2, 3, 25, 26, 161
  
• TFEU, Article 165 -P1 : points 4, 131
  
• TFEU, Article 165 -P2 : points 4, 137
  
• Regulation 1612/68 : point 5
  
• Regulation 1612/68 -A07P2 : points 2, 8, 25 - 27, 29, 30, 32 - 35, 39 - 41, 43, 47, 48, 56, 64, 65, 161
  
• Regulation 1612/68 -A12 : points 9, 29, 36 - 42
  
• Regulation 1612/68 -C3 : points 6, 90
  
• Regulation 1612/68 -C4 : points 6, 32
  
• Regulation 1612/68 -C5 : points 7, 90
  
• Directive 90/364 -A01 : point 93
  
• Directive 90/364 -A01P1 : point 93
  
• Directive 90/364 -A03 : point 93
  
• Directive 90/364 -C4 : point 93
  
• Directive 93/96 : point 93
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07 : point 10
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A16P1 : point 109
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A24 : points 11, 25
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A24P2 : points 72, 95, 109, 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/73 : points 56, 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/74 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/83 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/86 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -197/86 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -235/87 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -308/89 : points 37, 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/90 : point 93
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/94 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/96 : points 56, 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/97 : point 127
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -337/97 : points 33, 34, 56, 58, 127
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/99 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -466/00 : points 56, 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -138/02 : point 121
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -111/03 : point 124
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/03 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/03 : points 28, 71, 72, 75 - 79, 81, 82, 84, 88, 113, 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -258/04 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -372/04 : point 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/05 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -287/05 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -11/06 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -11/06 : points 76, 121
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -427/06 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -158/07 : points 109, 121
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/07 : points 28, 71, 79 - 83, 109
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -169/07 : point 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -208/07 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/07 : points 32, 33
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -73/08 : point 130
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/08 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -325/08 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -400/08 : point 100
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -400/08 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -480/08 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/09 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -503/09 : point 121
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 18/12/2009

Date of the Opinion

• 16/02/2012

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

14/06/2012

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 63 from 13.03.2010, p.31

Judgment: OJ C 227 from 28.07.2012, p.2

Name of the parties

Commission v Netherlands

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Vonk, G.J.: Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2012 nº 295 (NL)
2. Mok, M.R.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2012 nº 511 (NL)
3. Aubert, Michel ; Broussy, Emmanuelle ; Donnat, Francis: Chronique de jurisprudence de la CJUE. Libre circulation des travailleurs, L'actualité juridique ; droit administratif 2012 p.1575 (FR)
4. Michel, Valérie: Bourses d'études et condition de résidence, Europe 2012 Août-Septembre Comm. nº 8-9 p.28-29 (FR)
5. Van der Mei, A.P.: Tijdschrift Recht en Arbeid 2012 nº 12 p.28 (NL)
6. Hoogenboom, Alexander: Export of Study Grants and the Lawfulness of Durational Residency Requirements Comments on Case C-542/09, Commission v Nederland, European Journal of Migration and Law 2012 Vol. 14 p.417-437 (EN)
7. Schrauwen, A.A.M.: De kosten van studentenmobiliteit, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2012 p.336-341 (NL)
8. Fiumicelli, Davide: La normativa olandese sul finanziamento degli studi superiori all'estero: un'ingiustificata discriminazione indiretta dei lavoratori migranti e loro familiari, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 2012 p.1695-1702 (IT)
9. Van Ooik, Ronald: Rechtspraak Vreemdelingen recht (Ed. Ars Aequi Libri - Nijmegen) 2012 p.573-576 (NL)
10. De Witte, Floris: Who funds the mobile student? Shelding some light on the normative assumptions underlying EU free movement law: Commission v. Netherlands, Common Market Law Review 2013 p.203-216 (EN)
11. Weber, Sebastian: Freizügigkeit: Zugang zu Bildungsleistungen / Wohnsitzerfordernis, Zeitschrift für europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 2013 p.44-47 (DE)
12. Carlier, Jean-Yves: La libre circulation des personnes dans et vers l'Union européenne, Journal de droit européen 2013 nº 197 p.103-114 (FR)
13. Carlier, Jean-Yves: La libre circulation des personnes. dans l’Union européenne, Journal de droit européen 2014 nº 208 p.167-179 (FR)
14. Perišin, Tamara: Studentske stipendije u okviru prava jedinstvenog tržišta EU i europskog građanstva, Informator 2015 n°6349 p.1-3 (HR)
15. Carlier, Jean-Yves: La libre circulation des personnes dans l’Union européenne, Journal de droit européen 2016 nº 1 p.153-159 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Freedom of movement for workers
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Action for a declaration of failure to fulfil obligations : application granted
  

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Cunha Rodrigues

Advocate General

Sharpston

Language(s) of the Case

• Dutch
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English