Reports of Cases
2005 I-09115
Subject-matter
Annulment of the decision – Commission Regulation (EC) No 1829/2002 of 14 October 2002 amending the annex to Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 with regard to the name ‘Feta’ (OJ 2002 L 277, p. 10)
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-11 Approximation of laws
B-11.05 Protected names
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-11 Approximation of laws
B-11.05 Protected names
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-20 Acts of the institutions
B-20.05 Statement of reasons
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Maastricht), Article 148
-P2 : paragraph 6
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 253
: paragraphs 105 - 107, 109
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A81P1 : paragraph 29
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A81P2 : paragraph 29
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A02P1 : paragraph 2
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A02P2 : paragraph 2
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A02P2LA : paragraph 46
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A02P2LAT2 : paragraphs 49, 65
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A02P3 : paragraphs 2, 22, 46, 47, 49 - 51, 68
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A03 : paragraphs 33, 36, 100, 107
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A03P1 : paragraphs 3, 79, 84, 109
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A03P1L3 : paragraph 75
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A05 : paragraph 4
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A06 : paragraph 4
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A06P3 : paragraphs 5, 20
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A07 : paragraphs 4, 5, 7
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A15 : paragraph 6
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A17 : paragraphs 7, 8, 12
-
Decision 93/53
: paragraphs 9, 105
-
Decision 93/53
-A02 : paragraph 10
-
Decision 93/53
-A03 : paragraph 10
-
Decision 93/53
-A07P1 : paragraph 10
-
Decision 93/53
-A08P1 : paragraph 10
-
Regulation 2019/93
-A06P2 : paragraphs 59, 64
-
Regulation 1107/96
: paragraph 12
-
Regulation 1107/96
-N : paragraph 12
-
Decision 1999/468
: paragraph 31
-
Decision 1999/468
-A03P1 : paragraph 32
-
Decision 1999/468
-A03P2 : paragraph 32
-
Regulation 1070/1999
: paragraph 16
-
Regulation 442/2002
-A01PT4 : paragraph 59
-
Regulation 1829/2002
: paragraph 1
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-A01 : paragraph 20
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C11 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C12 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C13 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C14 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C15 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C16 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C17 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C18 : paragraphs 91, 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C19 : paragraphs 85, 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C20 : paragraphs 21, 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C21 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C22 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C23 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C24 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C25 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C26 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C27 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C28 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C29 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C30 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C31 : paragraphs 91, 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C32 : paragraph 102
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C33 : paragraphs 22, 102, 105
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C34 : paragraph 22
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C35 : paragraph 22
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C36 : paragraphs 22, 66
-
Regulation 1829/2002
-C37 : paragraph 22
-
Regulation 692/2003
-A01PT15 : paragraph 8
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/74
: paragraph 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/78
: paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/86
: paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -142/87
: paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/95
: paragraph 106
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -289/96
: paragraphs 13, 79, 93
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -328/00
: paragraph 106
Operative part
Opinion
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 230
-L5 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A80P1LA : point 112
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A81P1 : point 112
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A81P2 : point 112
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A02 : point 56
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A02P2 : points 29, 30, 189, 190
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A02P2LAT2 : points 40, 184, 193
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A02P3 : points 29, 38, 40, 86, 91, 184, 189, 190, 193
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A02P4 : points 29, 38, 43
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A03 : points 45, 121, 126
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A03P1 : points 46, 49, 91
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A03P1L3 : point 94
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A03P2 : point 50
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A03P3 : points 136, 139
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A04 : point 56
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A06P3 : point 100
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A07 : point 56
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A07P4T2 : point 155
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A13 : point 26
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A15 : points 54, 56
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A17 : points 55, 58, 87, 90, 157
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A17P1 : point 83
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A17P2 : point 46
-
Regulation 2081/92
-A17P3 : point 52
-
Regulation 2081/92
-C6 : point 25
-
Regulation 2081/92
-C7 : point 25
-
Regulation 2081/92
-C9 : point 16
-
Regulation 1107/96
: points 88, 90, 126, 207
-
Regulation 1107/96
-A01 : point 58
-
Regulation 1070/1999
: point 96
-
Regulation 1829/2002
: points 3, 100, 108, 207
-
Regulation 692/2003
: point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/74
: point 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/95
: point 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/95
: points 2, 27, 101 - 107
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -289/96
: points 2, 90 - 95
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
25/10/2005
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 55 from 08.03.2003, p.11
Judgment: OJ C 86 from 08.04.2006, p.1
Name of the parties
Germany and Denmark v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Bourges, Leticia A.: Queso "Feta": una denominación de origen protegida griega, Gaceta Jurídica de la C.E. y de la Competencia - Boletín 2005 nº 240 p.35-48 (ES)
- Mariatte, Flavien: Appellations d'origine et indications geographiques, Europe 2005 Décembre nº 405 Comm. p.14-15 (FR)
- Nikolopoulos, T.: Elliniki Epitheorisi Evropaïkou Dikaiou 2005 p.853-857 (EL)
- Knaak, Roland: Gemeinschaftsweiter Schutz der Bezeichnung "Feta" für Erzeugnisse aus Griechenland, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Lebensmittelrecht 2006 p.59-66 (DE)
- X: Revue de jurisprudence de droit des affaires 2006 p.74 (FR)
- Flury, Andrea: Das Ende der Leidensgeschichte? FETA ist im sicheren Hafen der geografischen Ursprungsbezeichnungen angekommen!, European Law Reporter 2006 p.26-27 (DE)
- Mok, M.R.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2006 nº 268 (NL)
- Levin, Marianne: Feta II - Helt grundläggande för skyddet av geografiska ursprungsbeteckningar i EU, Europarättslig tidskrift 2006 p.145-156 (SV)
- Anthimos, A.: Armenopoulos 2006 p.157-158 (EL)
- Benatti, Cinzia: Il revirement della Corte di giustizia sul caso "Feta", Rivista di diritto agrario 2006 II p.110-129 (IT)
- Ventura, Sergio: La tormentata vicenda della denominazione "Feta", Diritto comunitario e degli scambi internazionali 2006 p.497-506 (IT)
- Reed, Jeremy: Feta: A Cheese or a Fudge? Federal Republic of Germany v Commission, European Intellectual Property Review 2006 p.535-538 (EN)
- Jánošíková, Martina: Rozudok "FETA", Výber z rozhodnutí Súdneho dvora Európskych spoločenstiev 2007 p.97 (SK)
- Ruzek, Vincent: Chronique de jurisprudence communautaire agricole (2004-2005), Revue de droit rural 2007 nº 350 p.26-27 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Agriculture and Fisheries
- - Milk products
- - Foodstuffs
- Consumer protection
- Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Cunha Rodrigues
Advocate General
Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion