Reports of Cases
not yet published (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.11 Information and communication technologies
4.11.11.01 Telecommunications
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.11 Information and communication technologies
4.11.11.01 Telecommunications
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007)
: paragraph 21
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7
: paragraphs 1, 19, 20, 26, 27, 30, 33, 39, 45, 46, 59
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8
: paragraphs 1, 19, 20, 26, 27, 30, 33, 39, 45, 46, 59
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 11
: paragraphs 1, 19, 20, 26, 27, 30, 45, 46, 59
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52
-P1 : paragraphs 1, 19, 20, 26, 27, 30, 45, 46, 59
-
Directive 2002/58
-A02 : paragraph 4
-
Directive 2002/58
-A05 : paragraphs 5, 32
-
Directive 2002/58
-A06 : paragraphs 6, 32
-
Directive 2002/58
-A09 : paragraph 32
-
Directive 2002/58
-A09P1 : paragraph 7
-
Directive 2002/58
-A15P1 : paragraphs 1, 8, 19 - 21, 26, 27, 29, 30, 41, 45, 46, 49, 59
-
Directive 2002/58
-A15P1SNT1 : paragraph 34
-
Directive 2002/58
-C2 : paragraph 3
-
Directive 2002/58
-C11 : paragraph 3
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/07
-N25 : paragraph 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
: paragraphs 19, 26
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N117 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N118 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N119 : paragraph 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N120 : paragraph 23
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/15
-N229 : paragraph 53
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/15
-N230 : paragraph 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
: paragraph 26
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N54 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -623/17
-N68 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -623/17
-N77 : paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -746/18
: paragraphs 52, 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N117 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N130 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N131 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N132 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N140 : paragraph 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N146 : paragraph 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N157 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N158 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N166 : paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N167 : paragraph 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N168 : paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N176 : paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N188 : paragraph 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N189 : paragraph 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N222 : paragraph 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N223 : paragraph 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N225 : paragraph 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N226 : paragraph 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -511/18
-N227 : paragraph 44
Operative part
Opinion
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7
: points 1, 26, 30, 31, 36, 37, 48, 51, 53, 67, 74, 75, 97, 130
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8
: points 1, 26, 30, 31, 36, 37, 48, 51, 53, 67, 74, 75, 97, 130
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8
-P3 : point 101
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 11
: points 1, 26, 30, 31, 36, 37, 48, 51, 53, 97, 130
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52
-P1 : points 1, 26, 30, 31, 36, 37, 48, 51, 53, 97, 129, 130
-
Directive 95/46
-A28P1L2 : point 102
-
Directive 2002/58
: points 29, 38, 39, 46
-
Directive 2002/58
-A01P3 : points 6, 40, 42
-
Directive 2002/58
-A15P1 : points 1, 7, 26, 30, 31, 36, 37, 42, 44, 48, 49, 51, 53, 67, 89, 97, 126, 129, 130
-
Directive 2002/58
-A15P1SNT1 : points 58, 68
-
Directive 2009/136
: points 1, 130
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/95
-N19 : point 109
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -276/01
-N71 : point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/12
-N51 : point 102
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/12
-N53 : point 103
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -293/12
: point 126
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/14
-N40 : point 101
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/14
-N41 : point 101
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
: points 26, 29, 34, 36, 41, 52, 75, 99, 105, 106, 110, 114, 125, 126, 128
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N53 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N57 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N99 : point 70
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N113 : point 57
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N115 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N116 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N117 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N118 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N119 : points 60, 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N120 : points 5, 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N121 : point 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/15
-N122 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/15
-N202 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/15
-N208 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/15
-N229 : point 101
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -207/16
-N33 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -207/16
-N84 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
: points 29, 41, 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N34 : point 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N35 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N36 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N37 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N38 : point 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N39 : point 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N49 : point 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N50 : point 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N53 : points 68, 89
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N54 : point 70
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N55 : points 33, 36, 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N56 : points 33, 36, 72, 86
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N57 : points 33, 36, 73
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N59 : points 75, 81
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N60 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N61 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/16
-N62 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N72 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N73 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N74 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N75 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N76 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N77 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N78 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N79 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N80 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N81 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N82 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N83 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N84 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N85 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N86 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N87 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N88 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N89 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N90 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N91 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N92 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N93 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N94 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N95 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N96 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N97 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N98 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N99 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N100 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N101 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N102 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N103 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N104 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N105 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N106 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -520/18
-N107 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -192/18
-N108 : point 105
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -192/18
-N109 : point 105
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -192/18
-N110 : point 105
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/18
-N39 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/18
-N40 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -489/19
-N38 : point 104
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -566/19
-N55 : point 104
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
02/03/2021
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Information not available
Name of the parties
Prokuratuur (Conditions d’accès aux données relatives aux communications électroniques)
Notes on Academic Writings
- Simon, Denys: Droits fondamentaux - Traitement des données personnelles, Europe 2021, nº 5 Mai, comm. 146 (FR)
- Rýdlová, Hana: Soudní dvůr EU : rozsudek Soudního dvora EU ze dne 2. 3. 2021 ve věci C-746/18, H. K v. Prokuratuur, Bulletin advokacie 2021 nº 4 p. 60-61 (CS)
- Bertrand, Brunessen: L'audace sans le tact : jusqu'où la Cour de justice peut-elle aller trop loin ?, Dalloz IP / IT 2021, nº 9, p. 468-472 (FR)
- Cascone, Giulia: La corte di giustizia dell’unione europea definisce le condizioni per la legittimità delle normative nazionali in materia di acquisizione dei tabulati. le ripercussioni sull’ordinamento italianodella sentenza del 2 marzo 2021 (c-746/18) nel caso H.K., Cassazione penale 2022, p. 419-440 (IT)
- Cascone, Giulia: La Corte di Giustizia dell'Unione Europea definisce le condizioni per la legittimità delle normative nazionali in materia di acquisizione dei tabulati. Le ripercussioni sull'ordinamento Italiano della sentenza del 2 marzo 2021 (C-746/18) nel caso H.K. - The European Court of Justice defines the conditions for the legitimacy of national legislations on the acquisition of traffic and location data. The consequences on the Italian legal system of the Judgement of the Court of 2 March 2021 (C-746/18) in the case H.K., Cassazione penale 2022, n° 2, p. 419-440 (IT)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Riigikohus - Estonia
Subject-matter
- Approximation of laws
- Telecommunications
- Fundamental rights
- - Charter of Fundamental Rights
Provisions of national law referred to
Kriminaalmenetluse seadustik (Code de prodédure pénale), §-d 17 lg 1; 30 lg-d 1 ja 2; 90¹ lg-d 2 ja 3; 201, 12/02/2003
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
von Danwitz
Advocate General
Pitruzzella
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion